Habitat selection by the Texas tortoise in a managed thornscrub ecosystem

Brush encroachment on semiarid shrublands resulting from livestock grazing has created global concern. Southern Texas is dominated by Prosopis-Acacia mixed brush communities typical of the Tamaulipan Biotic Province, and the geographic range of the state-threatened Texas tortoise (Gopherus berlandieri) is nearly identical to the boundaries of this biotic province in Texas. In light of the perceived threat to Texas tortoises because of habitat change caused by brush encroachment, we monitored 36 Texas tortoises by radiotelemetry during 1994-1996 to assess habitat selection on a site containing grazed and ungrazed pastures. Tortoises did not exhibit habitat selection at the level of locations within home ranges. Differential habitat selection at the level of home ranges within study areas was not apparent for sex, but was evident for treatment (grazed or ungrazed). Analysis of pooled data indicated that tortoises exhibited broad-scale selection for home ranges within study areas. Selection was expressed as preferential avoidance of old-field and riparian habitats, which represented vegetational extremes of canopy cover. However, tortoises tolerated the broad continuum of other brush communities on the study site. Apparent treatment differences may be an artifact of our inability to adequately pair study areas given the scale of tortoise movement. Our data indicate that increases in the extent of woody canopy cover resulting from grazing-induced brush encroachment will not be detrimental to Texas tortoises. Furthermore, large-scale range improvement practices, such as root-plowing, create unsuitable habitats for this species.

[1]  Douglas H. Johnson THE COMPARISON OF USAGE AND AVAILABILITY MEASUREMENTS FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE PREFERENCE , 1980 .

[2]  Nicholas J. Aebischer,et al.  Compositional Analysis of Habitat Use From Animal Radio-Tracking Data , 1993 .

[3]  D. C. Ruthven,et al.  VARIATION IN TORTOISE LIFE HISTORY: DEMOGRAPHY OF GOPHERUS BERLANDIERI , 2000 .

[4]  W. F. Blair Biotic Provinces of Texas , 1950 .

[5]  F. Crosswhite Dry country plants of the South Texas Plains. , 1980 .

[6]  T. Fulbright,et al.  Long-term effects of root plowing on vegetation in the eastern south Texas plains , 1993 .

[7]  W. Reese,et al.  Manual of the Vascular Plants of Texas , 1971 .

[8]  D. Germano Growth and age at maturity of North American tortoises in relation to regional climates , 1994 .

[9]  T. Fulbright,et al.  Long-term effects of brush management on vegetation diversity in ephemeral drainages , 1994 .

[10]  D. Milchunas,et al.  Quantitative Effects of Grazing on Vegetation and Soils Over a Global Range of Environments , 1993 .

[11]  C. Guyer,et al.  Burrow Abandonment by Gopher Tortoises in Slash Pine Plantations of the Conecuh National Forest , 1999 .

[12]  R. Bury,et al.  Aspects of the Ecology and Management of the Tortoise Gopherus berlandieri at Laguna Atascosa, Texas , 1986 .

[13]  D. Ashton,et al.  Effects of Disturbance and Grazing by Cattle on the Dynamics of Heathland and Grassland Communities on the Bogong High Plains, Victoria , 1987 .

[14]  Clyde W. Neu,et al.  A TECHNIQUE FOR ANALYSIS OF UTILIZATION- AVAILABILITY DATA' , 1974 .

[15]  S. Archer,et al.  Have Southern Texas Savannas Been Converted to Woodlands in Recent History? , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[16]  R. Ansley,et al.  SURVIVAL OF MESQUITE SEEDLINGS EMERGING FROM CATTLE AND WILDLIFE FECES IN A SEMI-ARID GRASSLAND , 1998 .

[17]  B. Rose,et al.  Microhabitat Use and Home Range Characteristics of Blunt-nosed Leopard Lizards , 1998 .