Diffusion-weighted imaging in rectal carcinoma patients without and after chemoradiotherapy: a comparative study with histology.

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can be used to quantitatively assess functional parameters in rectal carcinoma that are relevant for prognosis and treatment response assessment. However, there is no consensus on the histopathological background underlying the findings derived from DWI. The aim of this study was to perform a comparison of DWI and histologic parameters in two groups of rectal carcinoma patients without (n=12) and after (n=9) neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model was used to calculate the diffusion coefficient D and the perfusion fraction f in rectal carcinoma, the adjacent rectum and fat in the two patient groups. Immunohistological analysis was performed to assess the cellularity, vascular area fraction and vessel diameter for comparison and correlation. Out of 36 correlations between parameters from DWI and histology, four were found to be significant. In rectal carcinoma of patients without CRT, the diffusion D and the perfusion f correlated with the vascular area fraction, respectively, which could not be found in the group of patients who received CRT. Further correlations were found for the rectum and fat. Histological evaluation revealed significant differences between the tissues on the microscopic level concerning the cellular and vascular environment that influence diffusion and perfusion. In conclusion, DWI produces valuable biomarkers for diffusion and perfusion in rectal carcinoma and adjacent tissues that are highly dependent of the underlying cellular microenvironment influenced by structural and functional changes as well as the administered treatment, and consequently can be beyond histological ascertainability.

[1]  R. Bammer Basic principles of diffusion-weighted imaging. , 2003, European journal of radiology.

[2]  T L Chenevert,et al.  Monitoring early response of experimental brain tumors to therapy using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. , 1997, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[3]  K. Haustermans,et al.  Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Selection of Complete Responders After Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Study , 2011, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[4]  Bram Stieltjes,et al.  Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI for the Differentiation Between Mass Forming Chronic Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Carcinoma , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[5]  Jae Young Lee,et al.  Locally advanced rectal cancer: added value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the evaluation of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemo- and radiation therapy. , 2009, Radiology.

[6]  Jan Wolber,et al.  Diffusion MRI for prediction of response of rectal cancer to chemoradiation , 2002, The Lancet.

[7]  P. Choyke,et al.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. , 2009, Neoplasia.

[8]  Bram Stieltjes,et al.  An in vivo verification of the intravoxel incoherent motion effect in diffusion‐weighted imaging of the abdomen , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[10]  H. Goldschmidt,et al.  Diffusion‐weighted imaging for non‐invasive and quantitative monitoring of bone marrow infiltration in patients with monoclonal plasma cell disease: a comparative study with histology , 2011, British journal of haematology.

[11]  Lei Tang,et al.  Locally advanced rectal carcinoma treated with preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy: preliminary analysis of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for early detection of tumor histopathologic downstaging. , 2010, Radiology.

[12]  Rakesh K Jain,et al.  Molecular regulation of vessel maturation , 2003, Nature Medicine.

[13]  J. Felblinger,et al.  omparative study of two whole-body imaging techniques in the case of elanoma metastases : Advantages of multi-contrast MRI examination ncluding a diffusion-weighted sequence in comparison with PET-CT , 2010 .

[14]  V. Goh,et al.  Novel oncologic drugs: what they do and how they affect images. , 2011, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[15]  Bram Stieltjes,et al.  Differentiation of Pancreas Carcinoma From Healthy Pancreatic Tissue Using Multiple b-Values: Comparison of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Derived Parameters , 2009, Investigative radiology.

[16]  Surgical management of rectal cancer: a multidisciplinary approach to technical and technological advances. , 2005, The British journal of radiology.

[17]  W. Semmler,et al.  Sorafenib tosylate and paclitaxel induce anti-angiogenic, anti-tumour and anti-resorptive effects in experimental breast cancer bone metastases. , 2011, European journal of cancer.

[18]  Jürgen Griebel,et al.  Tumor microcirculation and diffusion predict therapy outcome for primary rectal carcinoma. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[20]  N. deSouza,et al.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and its application to cancer , 2006, Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society.

[21]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. , 1988, Radiology.

[22]  Wiley Interscience,et al.  Histopathological response after preoperative radiochemotherapy in rectal carcinoma is associated with improved overall survival , 2008, Journal of surgical oncology.

[23]  M Nolden,et al.  MITK Diffusion Imaging , 2012, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[24]  A. Goetz,et al.  Quantitative imaging of tumour blood flow by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, British Journal of Cancer.