Designing a network of green infrastructure to enhance the conservation value of protected areas and maintain ecosystem services.

There is a growing demand for holistic landscape planning to enhance sustainable use of ecosystem services (ESS) and maintenance of the biodiversity that supports them. In this context, the EU is developing policy to regulate the maintenance of ESS and enhance connectivity among protected areas (PAs). This is known as the network of Green Infrastructure (GI). However, there is not a working framework defined to plan the spatial design of such network of GI. Here, we use the software Marxan with Zones, to prioritize the spatial distribution of different management zones that accommodate the needs of a network of GI. These zones included a conservation zone, mainly devoted to protecting biodiversity, a GI zone, that aimed at connecting PAs and maintaining regulating and cultural ESS; and a management zone devoted to exploiting provisioning ESS. We performed four planning scenarios that distribute the targets for ESS and biodiversity in different ways across management zones. We also conducted a sensitivity analysis by increasing ESS targets to explore trade-offs that may occur when managing together biodiversity and ESS. We use Catalonia (northeastern Spain) as a case study. We found that the representation of ESS could be achieved for intermediate targets in all scenarios. There was, however, a threshold on these targets over which trade-offs appeared between maintaining regulating and cultural ESS and biodiversity versus getting access to provisioning ESS. These "thresholds values" were displaced towards higher ESS targets when we moved from more strict to more flexible planning scenarios (i.e., scenarios that allowed mixing representation of objectives for biodiversity and ESS within the same zone). This methodological approach could help design a framework to integrate biodiversity and ESS management in holistic plans and decision making and, at the same time, meeting European mandates concerning the design of GI networks, or similar needs elsewhere.

[1]  J. Bonet,et al.  Assessing the distribution of forest ecosystem services in a highly populated Mediterranean region , 2018, Ecological Indicators.

[2]  M. Araújo,et al.  Additive threats from pathogens, climate and land-use change for global amphibian diversity , 2011, Nature.

[3]  C. Polce,et al.  Spatial alternatives for Green Infrastructure planning across the EU: An ecosystem service perspective , 2018 .

[4]  S. Lai,et al.  Green infrastructure and ecological corridors: a regional study concerning Sardinia , 2018 .

[5]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Marxan with Zones: Software for optimal conservation based land- and sea-use zoning , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[6]  Stephen Polasky,et al.  Mapping and Valuing Ecosystem Services as an Approach for Conservation and Natural‐Resource Management , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Barbara Hofer,et al.  A land-use-based modelling chain to assess the impacts of Natural Water Retention Measures on Europe’s Green Infrastructure , 2013, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[8]  Kostas Bithas,et al.  Integration of ecological–biological thresholds in conservation decision making , 2016, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[9]  Georgina M. Mace,et al.  Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: A meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world , 2014 .

[10]  F. Chapin,et al.  Consequences of changing biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[11]  K. Gaston,et al.  Reframing landscape fragmentation's effects on ecosystem services. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  Vandecasteele Ine,et al.  Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services: Trends in ecosystems and ecosystem services in the European Union between 2000 and 2010 , 2015 .

[13]  P. Kareiva,et al.  An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Marxan with Zones (v1. 0.1): Conservation Zoning using Spatially Explicit Annealing, a Manual , 2008 .

[15]  Joan Estrada,et al.  Atles dels ocells nidificants de Catalunya 1999-2002 , 2004 .

[16]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Gretchen C Daily,et al.  Conservation Planning for Ecosystem Services , 2006, PLoS biology.

[18]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  Uncertainties in Ecosystem Service Maps: A Comparison on the European Scale , 2014, PloS one.

[19]  Georgina M. Mace,et al.  Whose conservation? , 2014, Science.

[20]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  Analysis of Trade‐Offs Between Biodiversity, Carbon Farming and Agricultural Development in Northern Australia Reveals the Benefits of Strategic Planning , 2017 .

[21]  Sergi Herrando,et al.  The spatial level of analysis affects the patterns of forest ecosystem services supply and their relationships. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[22]  Olaf Bastian,et al.  The role of biodiversity in supporting ecosystem services in Natura 2000 sites , 2013 .

[23]  R. Costanza,et al.  Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  G. Daily,et al.  Conserving Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services , 2001, Science.

[25]  R. Abell,et al.  The role of protected areas for freshwater biodiversity conservation: challenges and opportunities in a rapidly changing world , 2016 .

[26]  Mathieu Rouget,et al.  Integrating ecosystem services into conservation assessments: a review. , 2007 .

[27]  Elizabeth A. Law,et al.  Making decisions for managing ecosystem services , 2015 .

[28]  Grazia Zulian,et al.  Mapping green infrastructure based on ecosystem services and ecological networks: A Pan-European case study , 2015 .

[29]  H. Possingham,et al.  Harnessing Carbon Payments to Protect Biodiversity , 2009, Science.

[30]  Timo Pukkala,et al.  Impact of forest management intensity on landscape-level mushroom productivity: A regional model-based scenario analysis , 2014 .

[31]  Andrew F. Bennett,et al.  Habitat fragmentation and landscape change , 2010 .

[32]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines , 2010, Science.

[33]  L. Cattarino,et al.  Catchment zoning to enhance co-benefits and minimize trade-offs between ecosystem services and freshwater biodiversity conservation , 2018 .

[34]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  A framework for systematic conservation planning and management of Mediterranean landscapes , 2013 .

[35]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Effectiveness of marine reserve networks in representing biodiversity and minimizing impact to fishermen: a comparison of two approaches used in California , 2008 .

[36]  A.P.E. van Oudenhoven,et al.  UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Ecosystem Services as a Contested Concept: A Synthesis of Critique and Counter-arguments Schötter, , 2014 .

[37]  Sergi Herrando,et al.  Indicators of the impact of land use changes using large-scale bird surveys: Land abandonment in a Mediterranean region , 2014 .

[38]  Robert M Ewers,et al.  Interactive effects of habitat modification and species invasion on native species decline. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[39]  M. Benedict,et al.  Green infrastructure: smart conservation for the 21st century. , 2002 .