Comparative study for image registration techniques of remote sensing images

Abstract Image registration determines the relative orientation between two images. As there are different techniques for image registration, it is important to compare these techniques to identify the advantages and disadvantages of each one. In this paper, a comparison between a fast Fourier transform (FFT)-based technique, a contour-based technique, a wavelet-based technique, a Harris–Pulse Coupled Neural Network (PCNN)-based technique and Harris–Moment-based technique is presented. The algorithms were tested on Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) and SPOT remote sensing images and its performance were compared using the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). It has been concluded that the order of techniques with less RMSE is the PCNN, the moment, the contour, the wavelet and the FFT-based techniques, respectively. Whereas the order of techniques with the less running time is the contour, the wavelet, the moment, the FFT and the PCNN-based techniques, respectively. And finally the technique that detects the more control points in both images is the wavelet.

[1]  P. Anandan Model based techniques for image registration and three-dimensional scene analysis from image sequences , 1993, Proceedings of 27th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[2]  Reinhard Eckhorn,et al.  Feature Linking via Synchronization among Distributed Assemblies: Simulations of Results from Cat Visual Cortex , 1990, Neural Computation.

[3]  Gérard G. Medioni,et al.  A graph-based global registration for 2D mosaics , 2000, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000.

[4]  Vladik Kreinovich,et al.  Automatic referencing of satellite and radar images , 2001, 2001 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. e-Systems and e-Man for Cybernetics in Cyberspace (Cat.No.01CH37236).

[5]  B. S. Manjunath,et al.  A contour-based approach to multisensor image registration , 1995, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[6]  Jason M. Kinser,et al.  Image Processing using Pulse-Coupled Neural Networks , 1998, Perspectives in Neural Computing.

[7]  B. N. Chatterji,et al.  An FFT-based technique for translation, rotation, and scale-invariant image registration , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[8]  C. Morandi,et al.  Registration of Translated and Rotated Images Using Finite Fourier Transforms , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[9]  Imre Kiss,et al.  A New Implementation of the Mellin Transform and its Application to Radar Classification of Ships , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[10]  Max H. M. Costa,et al.  Automatic registration of satellite images , 1997, Proceedings X Brazilian Symposium on Computer Graphics and Image Processing.

[11]  Harvey F. Silverman,et al.  A Class of Algorithms for Fast Digital Image Registration , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[12]  Lisa M. Brown,et al.  A survey of image registration techniques , 1992, CSUR.

[13]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  A computational vision approach to image registration , 1993, IEEE Trans. Image Process..