Milk quality and mastitis tests

A variety of diagnostic tests are routinely used to evaluate milk quality on dairy farms. Tests such as bulk milk bacterial counts, bulk tank somatic cell count and tests for adulterants such as water, sediment or antibiotics are routinely used by regulatory agencies. Other tests such as individual cow somatic cell count values, Staphylococcus aureus milk antibody tests, the California Mastitis test, milk conductivity and milk microbiology are often used diagnostically to investigate milk quality problems. Veterinarians also use various types of antibiotic susceptibility tests to help guide mastitis treatment decisions. The successful use of milk quality and mastitis tests requires knowledge of the methodology and diagnostic capabilities of each test. This paper reviews practical applications and supporting research of tests that are commonly used to investigate and solve milk quality and mastitis problems on dairy farms.

[1]  K. Boor,et al.  Identification and characterization of elevated microbial counts in bulk tank raw milk. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  D. O. Noorlander,et al.  Experiments and observations leading to development of the California mastitis test. , 1957, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[3]  R. Farnsworth.  Microbiologic examination of bulk tank milk. , 1993, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice.

[4]  M. Nielen,et al.  Electrical conductivity of milk: measurement, modifiers, and meta analysis of mastitis detection performance. , 1992, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  H. Seegers,et al.  Calculated milk production losses associated with elevated somatic cell counts in dairy cows: review and critical discussion. , 1998, Veterinary research.

[6]  J. Prescott,et al.  Antimicrobial therapy in veterinary medicine. , 1988 .

[7]  O. A. Ghiggoile.  Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products , 1949 .

[8]  F. Aarestrup,et al.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis in Europe and the United States. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  T. M. Grove,et al.  Use of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to monitor the control of Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. , 1992, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  L. Timms,et al.  Dynamics and significance of coagulase-negative staphylococcal intramammary infections. , 1987, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  J E Hillerton,et al.  Identification of subclinical mastitis with a hand-held electrical conductivity meter , 1991, Veterinary Record.

[12]  R. Harmon,et al.  SOMATIC CELL COUNTS: A PRIMER , 2001 .

[13]  R. Gonzalez,et al.  Shedding pattern of Staphylococcus aureus from bovine intramammary infections. , 1990, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  J. Cunningham,et al.  Collaborative study of the Bactoscan - An automated method for determinations of total bacteria in raw milk , 1988 .

[15]  R. P. Natzke,et al.  Predictability by somatic cell counts related to prevalence of intrammary infection within herds. , 1982, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  P. Ruegg,et al.  The relationship between antibiotic residue violations and somatic cell counts in Wisconsin dairy herds. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[17]  D. Wilson,et al.  Evaluation of milk culture, SCC and CMT for screening herdadditions , 1997 .

[18]  R. P. Dinsmore,et al.  Evaluation of methods for the diagnosis of Streptococcus agalactiae intramammary infections in dairy cattle. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.

[19]  S. Sumner,et al.  Testing bulk tank milk samples , 1999 .

[20]  F. Newbould,et al.  The Use of the California Mastitis Test for the Detection Of Bovine Mastitis. , 1961, The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne.

[21]  T. Lam,et al.  Estimation of variance components for somatic cell counts to determine thresholds for uninfected quarters. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  M. Godkin.  The relationship between bulk tank milk culture results, management factors used in mastitis control and the herd prevalence of mastitis. , 1990 .

[23]  D. Wilson,et al.  Microbiological results from milk samples obtained premilking and postmilking for the diagnosis of bovine intramammary infections. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.

[24]  I. Dohoo,et al.  Evaluation of changes in somatic cell counts as indicators of new intramammary infections , 1991 .

[25]  L. Fox,et al.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of microorganisms isolated from the mammary glands of dairy heifers. , 1995, Journal of dairy science.

[26]  W. Mcnab,et al.  A comparison of the Bactoscan 8000S to three cultural methods for enumeration of bacteria in raw milk , 1997 .

[27]  Alfonso Zecconi,et al.  Evaluation of the electrical conductivity of milk as a mastitis indicator , 1998 .

[28]  P. Bartlett,et al.  Use of Bulk Tank and Milk Filter Cultures in Screening for Streptococcus agalactiae and Coagulase-positive Staphylococci. , 1991, Journal of food protection.

[29]  W. Sischo,et al.  Comparison of microbiologic culture, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and determination of somatic cell count for diagnosing Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in dairy cows. , 1994, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[30]  J. Sargeant,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of somatic cell count and California Mastitis Test for identifying intramammary infection in early lactation. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[31]  B. Kitchen,et al.  Mastitis diagnostic tests to estimate mammary gland epithelial cell damage. , 1980, Journal of dairy science.

[32]  L. Luedecke,et al.  Relationship between California Mastitis Test reaction and bacteriological analyses of stripping samples. , 1968, Journal of dairy science.

[33]  C. S. Lee,et al.  Identification, properties, and differential counts of cell populations using electron microscopy of dry cows secretions, colostrum and milk from normal cows , 1980, Journal of Dairy Research.

[34]  Prescott Jf,et al.  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and antimicrobial drug dosage. , 1985 .

[35]  J. Hillerton,et al.  Detection of clinical mastitis by changes in electrical conductivity of foremilk before visible changes in milk. , 1996, Journal of dairy science.

[36]  J. Watts,et al.  Comparison of success of antibiotic therapy during lactation and results of antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bovine mastitis. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.

[37]  M. Nielen,et al.  Comparison of analysis techniques for on-line detection of clinical mastitis. , 1995, Journal of dairy science.

[38]  An evaluation of a hand-held electrical resistance meter for the diagnosis of bovine subclinical mastitis in late lactation under Australian conditions. , 2000, Australian veterinary journal.

[39]  Schalm Ow,et al.  Experiments and observations leading to development of the California mastitis test. , 1957 .

[40]  Brookbanks Eo.  The correlation between California Mastitis Test results and the presence of mastitis pathogens in composite milk samples. , 1966 .

[41]  K. Boor,et al.  Microbiological and chemical quality of raw milk in New York State. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[42]  Performance Studies of an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Detecting Staphylococcus Aureus Antibody in Bovine Milk , 1990, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[43]  P. Rainard,et al.  California Mastitis test guide of selective dry cow therapy. , 1981, Journal of dairy science.

[44]  S. Martin,et al.  Somatic cell counts in bovine milk: relationships to production and clinical episodes of mastitis. , 1984, Canadian journal of comparative medicine : Revue canadienne de medecine comparee.