Reversing the Reverse Cohesion Effect: Good Texts Can Be Better for Strategic, High-Knowledge Readers

Abstract Students with low knowledge have been shown to better understand and learn more from more cohesive texts, whereas high-knowledge students have been shown to learn more from lower cohesion texts; this has been called the reverse cohesion effect. This study examines whether students' comprehension skill affects the interaction between text cohesion and their domain knowledge. College students (n= 143) read either a high- or a low-cohesion text and answered text-based and bridging inference questions. The results indicated that the benefit of low-cohesion text was restricted to less skilled, high-knowledge readers, whereas skilled comprehenders with high knowledge benefited from a high-cohesion text. Consistent with McNamara (2001), the interaction of text cohesion and knowledge was restricted to text-based questions. In addition, for low-knowledge readers, the benefits of high-cohesion texts emerged in their responses to bridging inference questions but not text-based questions. The results suggest...

[1]  Philip B. Gough,et al.  The simple view of reading , 1990 .

[2]  David W. Chan,et al.  Reading strategy use and motivation among Chinese good and poor readers in Hong Kong , 2003 .

[3]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Effects of coherence and relevance on shallow and deep text processing. , 2002 .

[4]  Catherine Snow,et al.  Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension , 2002 .

[5]  M. Chi,et al.  Eliciting Self‐Explanations Improves Understanding , 1994 .

[6]  John T. Guthrie,et al.  Designing contexts to increase motivations for reading , 1997 .

[7]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Inference during reading. , 1992 .

[8]  Margaret G. McKeown,et al.  Learning From Social Studies Texts , 1989 .

[9]  Eileen Wood,et al.  Encouraging Mindful Use of Prior Knowledge: Attempting to Construct Explanatory Answers Facilitates Learning , 1992 .

[10]  W. Kintsch.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.

[11]  Margaret G. McKeown,et al.  Revising Social Studies Text from a Text-Processing Perspective: Evidence of Improved Comprehensibility. , 1991 .

[12]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[13]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Flexibility in text processing: A strategy competition model , 1990 .

[14]  Ernst Z. Rothkopf,et al.  PERSPECTIVES ON STUDY SKILLS TRAINING IN A REALISTIC INSTRUCTIONAL ECONOMY , 1988 .

[15]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Are Good Texts Always Better? Interactions of Text Coherence, Background Knowledge, and Levels of Understanding in Learning From Text , 1996 .

[16]  Danielle S McNamara,et al.  Suppressing Irrelevant Information: Knowledge Activation or Inhibition? , 2004 .

[17]  Eduardo Vidal-Abarca,et al.  Two procedures to improve instructional text: Effects on memory and learning. , 2000 .

[18]  A. Glenberg,et al.  The illusion of knowing: Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension , 1982 .

[19]  J. Oakhill.  INFERENTIAL AND MEMORY SKILLS IN CHILDREN'S COMPREHENSION OF STORIES , 1984 .

[20]  B. K. Britton,et al.  Using Kintsch's computational model to improve instructional text: Effects of repairing inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. , 1991 .

[21]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence , 1996 .

[22]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall , 1972 .

[23]  Ruth Garner,et al.  When Children and Adults Do Not Use Learning Strategies: Toward a Theory of Settings , 1990 .

[24]  Amy M. Shapiro,et al.  How Including Prior Knowledge As a Subject Variable May Change Outcomes of Learning Research , 2004 .

[25]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[26]  T. Arbuckle,et al.  Adult age differences in memory in relation to availability and accessibility of knowledge-based schemas. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  The psychology of written composition , 1987 .

[28]  Debra L. Long,et al.  Individual differences in the time course of inferential processing. , 1994 .

[29]  Katja Wiemer-Hastings,et al.  Using latent semantic analysis to assess reader strategies , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[30]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Encoding and recall of texts: The importance of material appropriate processing , 1990 .

[31]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[32]  M. R. Novick,et al.  Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. , 1971 .

[33]  Maribeth Cassidy Schmitt,et al.  A Questionnaire to Measure Children's Awareness of Strategic Reading Processes. , 1990 .

[34]  C. Bereiter,et al.  Use of Thinking Aloud in Identification and Teaching of Reading Comprehension Strategies , 1985 .

[35]  Dolores Durkin,et al.  What Classroom Observations Reveal about Reading Comprehension Instruction. Technical Report No. 106. , 1978 .

[36]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[37]  James F. Voss,et al.  Learning From History Text: The Interaction of Knowledge and Comprehension Skill with Text Structure , 1996 .

[38]  Patricia A. Alexander,et al.  Knowledge-seeking and self-schema: A case for the motivational dimensions of exposition , 1997 .

[39]  M. Barnes,et al.  Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[40]  D. McNamara.  SERT: Self-Explanation Reading Training , 2004 .

[41]  D. McNamara.  Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. , 2001, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[42]  C. Bereiter,et al.  Making Reading More Difficult: A Degraded Text Microworld for Teaching Reading Comprehension Strategies , 1991 .

[43]  James F. Voss,et al.  Text Processing of Domain-Related Information for Individuals with High and Low Domain Knowledge: Methodological Considerations. , 1979 .

[44]  C. Perfetti,et al.  A Trading Relationship between Reading Skill and Domain Knowledge in Children's Text Comprehension. , 1995 .

[45]  Mark Alan Forget.  Comparative Effects of Three Methods of Staff Development in Content Area Reading Instruction on Urban High School Teachers , 1999 .

[46]  Betsy A. Bowen,et al.  Four Puzzles in Adult Literacy: Reflections on the National Adult Literacy Survey , 1999 .

[47]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Assessing Reading Skill With a Think-Aloud Procedure and Latent Semantic Analysis , 2003 .

[48]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Changes in Reading Strategies as a Function of Reading Training: A Comparison of Live and Computerized Training , 2005 .

[49]  M. Daneman,et al.  A new tool for measuring and understanding individual differences in the component processes of reading comprehension , 2001 .

[50]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Cognitive Precursors to Science Comprehension , 2019, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

[51]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  What’s a Science Student to Do? , 2019, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

[52]  Eileen Wood,et al.  The Effect of Prior Knowledge on an Immediate and Delayed Associative Learning Task Following Elaborative Interrogation , 1993 .

[53]  Michelle Gaddy Everson,et al.  Effects of Causal Text Revisions on More- and Less-Skilled Readers' Comprehension of Easy and Difficult Texts , 2000 .

[54]  W. Kintsch.  Text comprehension, memory, and learning. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[55]  David Pearson,et al.  Beating the Odds in Teaching All Students To Read: Lessons from Effective Schools and Accomplished Teachers. , 2000 .

[56]  L. Baker.  An evaluation of the role of metacognitive deficits in learning disabilities. , 1982 .

[57]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Self-explaining science texts: strategies, knowledge, and reading skill , 2004 .