Deep venous thrombosis identification from analysis of ultrasound data

PurposeThe purpose of this research was to determine whether combined ultrasound- and sensor-based compressibility and augmented blood flow measures yielded better results for DVT detection than for the individual measures alone.MethodsTwenty-six limbs from 19 patients were scanned using a sensorized ultrasound DVT screening system, and compressibility and flow measures were obtained at 125 locations. Results from conventional compression ultrasound examination were used as gold standard, with seven vessels (four patients) positive for DVT. A classification approach was used to combine the individual DVT measures per vessel and generate an optimal feature for every possible combination of individual measures. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for the individual measures and for all combined measures, as was a usefulness criteria $$J$$J for measuring class separability.ResultsSeven optimal combined features were found with 100 % sensitivity and 100 % specificity, with the best combined feature having a $$J$$J value over two orders of magnitude greater than the best individual DVT measure.ConclusionsThe proposed approach for DVT detection combines different aspects of thrombus detection in a novel way generating a quantifiable measure and outperforms any of the individual measures when used independently. All of the combined measures included the flow measure as well as the slope compressibility measure, which uses the magnitude of the force applied by the ultrasound probe, suggesting that these measurements provide important information when characterizing DVT.

[1]  Ronald H Gottlieb,et al.  Randomized prospective study comparing routine versus selective use of sonography of the complete calf in patients with suspected deep venous thrombosis. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  Stavroula J Theodorou,et al.  Sonography and venography of the lower extremities for diagnosing deep vein thrombosis in symptomatic patients. , 2003, Clinical imaging.

[3]  Sergios Theodoridis,et al.  Pattern Recognition , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[4]  Julian Guerrero,et al.  System for vessel characterization : development and evaluation with application to deep vein thrombosis diagnosis , 2008 .

[5]  R Jensen,et al.  Colour Doppler flow imaging ultrasonography versus venography as screening method for asymptomatic postoperative deep venous thrombosis. , 1995, European journal of radiology.

[6]  C. Reinhold,et al.  Accuracy of sonography in the evaluation of calf deep vein thrombosis in both postoperative surveillance and symptomatic patients. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  S. Chakraverty,et al.  Computer assisted strain-gauge plethysmography is a practical method of excluding deep venous thrombosis. , 2001, Clinical radiology.

[8]  J. Cronan,et al.  Deep venous thrombosis: US assessment using vein compression. , 1987, Radiology.

[9]  Hiromasa Miura,et al.  Simple screening method for deep vein thrombosis by duplex ultrasonography using patients’ active maximum ankle dorsiflexion , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[10]  E W Salzman,et al.  Deep-vein thrombosis. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  J. Cronan,et al.  Venous thromboembolic disease: the role of US. , 1993, Radiology.

[12]  Septimiu E. Salcudean,et al.  Real-Time Vessel Segmentation and Tracking for Ultrasound Imaging Applications , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Septimiu E. Salcudean,et al.  System for deep venous thrombosis detection using objective compression measures , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.