Playing on the Globe: Facilitating virtual communications between Namibian and Finnish learners to co-design an interactive map game

An increasing trend of digitally enhancing learning provides unique opportunities to expand from local to global learning environments. However, current technologies and educational approaches do not adequately support creative communication and learning for primary school learners across the globe. We maintain that it is important to promote agentic engagement amongst learners by involving them in the design of their own digitally enhanced learning environment. In this study, we connected ten learners from a Namibian and a Finnish school in virtual communications to co-design an interactive map game. Following a research through design approach, we share a detailed account of the case study in which we facilitated a distributed co-design process, using Skype, a custom made VR environment, and Microsoft Whiteboard. We reflect on the co-design sessions, focusing on communication and the design concept evolution contributing to distributed co-design methods and techniques not only for the design community but also as an agentic learning process that could be incorporated into formal learning environments. With a paucity of existing empirical work of geographically distributed co-design with children, our case study provides an empirical foundation pointing at critical issues to be further investigated such as multilingual design, social cohesion, facilitation roles, technologies, design breadcrumbs, negotiations and learner’s pride.

[1]  Jason C. Yip,et al.  The Show Must Go On:: A Conceptual Model of Conducting Synchronous Participatory Design With Children Online , 2021, CHI.

[2]  Carolina Islas Sedano,et al.  Virtually Escaping Lock Down - co-designing a mixed reality escape room narrative with Namibian learners- , 2021, AfriCHI.

[3]  Jerry Alan Fails,et al.  Distributing participation in design: Addressing challenges of a global pandemic , 2021, International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction.

[4]  Emma J. Rose,et al.  Language as Participation: Multilingual User Experience Design , 2020, SIGDOC.

[5]  Juha Suoranta,et al.  Post-Covid-19 Education and Education Technology ‘Solutionism’: a Seller’s Market , 2020, Postdigital Science and Education.

[6]  Juan Pablo Hourcade,et al.  Child-Computer Interaction SIG: Looking Forward After 18 Years , 2020, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[7]  Matthew K. Horton,et al.  Enabling children to design for others with expanded proxy design , 2020, IDC.

[8]  L. Harris,et al.  Catering for ‘very different kids’: distance education teachers’ understandings of and strategies for student engagement , 2020, International Journal of Inclusive Education.

[9]  J. Reeve,et al.  How teachers can support students’ agentic engagement , 2020, Theory Into Practice.

[10]  Tina Emmler,et al.  The Epistemological Relevance of Case Studies as Narratives in Design-Based Research , 2020 .

[11]  Vero Vanden Abeele,et al.  Collaborative Design Thinking (CoDeT): A co-design approach for high child-to-adult ratios , 2019, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[12]  Markku Turunen,et al.  Exploring Globally Inclusive Online Collaboration for Indian and Finnish Schoolchildren , 2019, IDC.

[13]  Erkki Sutinen,et al.  Toward Pedagogy Driven Virtual Reality Learning Space Design , 2019, SUZA.

[14]  Athanasios Drigas,et al.  Virtual and augmented reality effects on K-12, higher and tertiary education students’ twenty-first century skills , 2018, Virtual Reality.

[15]  Marianne Kinnula,et al.  Empowering children through design and making: towards protagonist role adoption , 2018, PDC.

[16]  Alessandro Soro,et al.  Child designers creating personas to diversify design perspectives and concepts for their own technology enhanced library , 2018, IDC.

[17]  Ole Iversen,et al.  Child as Protagonist: Expanding the Role of Children in Participatory Design , 2017, IDC.

[18]  Rosella Gennari,et al.  Children's emotions and quality of products in participatory game design , 2017, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  Anja Stedjeberg Hansen How to best communicate with and encourage children during a design process , 2017 .

[20]  Zachary Pease,et al.  Inclusive Co-Design within a Three-Dimensional Game Environment , 2016, IDC.

[21]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Participation as a matter of concern in participatory design , 2015 .

[22]  Elizabeth Foss,et al.  A case for intergenerational distributed co-design: the online kidsteam example , 2015, IDC.

[23]  Vero Vanden Abeele,et al.  Challenging group dynamics in participatory design with children: lessons from social interdependence theory , 2015, IDC.

[24]  Asimina Vasalou,et al.  Bridging serious games and participatory design , 2014, Int. J. Child Comput. Interact..

[25]  Allison Druin,et al.  Methods and Techniques for Involving Children in the Design of New Technology for Children , 2013, Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact..

[26]  Patrick Olivier,et al.  Configuring participation: on how we involve people in design , 2013, CHI.

[27]  C. Meinel,et al.  Transforming Constructivist Learning into Action: Design Thinking in Education. , 2012 .

[28]  Elizabeth Foss,et al.  DisCo: a co-design online tool for asynchronous distributed child and adult design partners , 2012, IDC '12.

[29]  Zhu Hua,et al.  Communicating in a Lingua Franca: Children’s Interaction in an International Summer Camp , 2012 .

[30]  J. Reeve,et al.  Agency as a fourth aspect of students engagement during learning activities , 2011 .

[31]  Paul Dourish,et al.  How emotion is made and measured , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[32]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Culture and Computers: A Review of the Concept of Culture and Implications for Intercultural Collaborative Online Learning , 2007, IWIC.

[33]  Allison Druin,et al.  The role of children in the design of new technology , 2002 .