Psychometric properties of the Worker Role Interview.

OBJECTIVES This study examined the psychometric properties of the rating scale of the Worker Role Interview (WRI). The study also asked whether the scale's items formed a valid measure of the construct, psychosocial capacity for work, and whether they were targeted to and could effectively discriminate between persons at different levels of psychosocial ability for work. METHOD OF STUDY Data were collected from 21 raters on 440 participants from the United States, Sweden and Iceland. A many-faceted Rasch model was used to analyze the data. RESULTS Most items of the scale worked effectively to measure the underlying construct for which the WRI was designed. In addition, the items were ordered from least to more of the underlying construct as expected. The scale validly measured 90.23% of the participants, who varied by nationality, culture, age and diagnostic status. The scale's items distinguished participants into approximately three different strata and were appropriately targeted to the participants. Seventeen of the 21 raters used scale in a valid manner. CONCLUSIONS The WRI scale and items are valid across ages, diagnoses, and culture and effectively measure a wide range of persons.

[1]  T. Mallinson,et al.  The Occupational Performance History Interview: Evidence for Three Underlying Constructs of Occupational Adaptation , 1998 .

[2]  Gary Kielhofner,et al.  The model of human occupation: understanding the worker who is injured or disabled. , 1999, Work.

[3]  B. Wright,et al.  Observations are always ordinal; measurements, however, must be interval. , 1989, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  B. Wright,et al.  Best test design , 1979 .

[5]  Gary Kielhofner, Kirsty Forsyth Measurement Properties of a Client Self-report for Treatment Planning and Documenting Therapy Outcomes , 2001 .

[6]  J. Lai,et al.  Psychometric properties of the work environment impact scale: a cross-cultural study. , 1999, Work.

[7]  C. McHorney,et al.  Evaluation of the MOS SF-36 physical functioning scale (PF-10): I. Unidimensionality and reproducibility of the Rasch item scale. , 1994, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[8]  J. Kramer,et al.  Worker Role Interview: Testing the psychometric properties of the Icelandic version , 2007, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.

[9]  S. Biernacki,et al.  Reliability of the worker role interview. , 1993, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[10]  Gary Kielhofner,et al.  Model of human occupation : theory and application , 1985 .

[11]  B. Braveman Development of a Community-Based Return to Work Program for People with AIDS , 2001, Occupational therapy in health care.

[12]  Lena Haglund,et al.  The Worker Role Interview—Preliminary Data on the Predictive Validity of Return to Work of Clients After an Insurance Medicine Investigation , 2004, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[13]  G Kielhofner,et al.  Construct validity of a work environment impact scale. , 1997, Work.

[14]  B. Wright Reasonable mean-square fit values , 1994 .

[15]  J C Grip,et al.  Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference. , 1989, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  J. Lai,et al.  Validity of the Swedish version of the worker role interview. , 1997 .