The Invisible Work of Accessibility: How Blind Employees Manage Accessibility in Mixed-Ability Workplaces

Over the past century, people who are blind and their allies have developed successful public policies and technologies in support of creating more accessible workplaces. However, simply creating accessible technologies does not guarantee that these will be available or adopted. Because much work occurs within shared workspaces, decisions about assistive technology use may be mediated by social interactions with, and expectations of, sighted coworkers. We present findings from a qualitative field study of five workplaces from the perspective of blind employees. Although all participants were effective employees, they expressed that working in a predominantly sighted office environment produces impediments to a blind person's independence and to their integration as an equal coworker. We describe strategies employed by our participants to create and maintain an accessible workplace and present suggestions for future technology that better supports blind workers as equal peers in the workplace.

[1]  Beryl Plimmer,et al.  Multimodal collaborative handwriting training for visually-impaired people , 2008, CHI.

[2]  Jacob O. Wobbrock,et al.  In the shadow of misperception: assistive technology use and social interactions , 2011, CHI.

[3]  Krzysztof Z. Gajos,et al.  Ability-Based Design: Concept, Principles and Examples , 2011, TACC.

[4]  Anne Marie Piper,et al.  Supporting medical conversations between deaf and hearing individuals with tabletop displays , 2008, CSCW.

[5]  Amy Hurst,et al.  "just let the cane hit it": how the blind and sighted see navigation differently , 2014, ASSETS.

[6]  Shaun K. Kane,et al.  Collaborative Accessibility: How Blind and Sighted Companions Co-Create Accessible Home Spaces , 2015, CHI.

[7]  Jeffrey P. Bigham,et al.  Crowdsourcing subjective fashion advice using VizWiz: challenges and opportunities , 2012, ASSETS '12.

[8]  Ingrid Scott,et al.  Perceptual Impairments: New Advancements Promoting Technological Access , 2007 .

[9]  B Phillips,et al.  Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. , 1993, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[10]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  Investigating the appropriateness of social network question asking as a resource for blind users , 2013, CSCW.

[11]  Karrie Karahalios,et al.  ACES: promoting empathy towards aphasia through language distortion emulation software , 2011, CHI.

[12]  John F. Veiga,et al.  Toward a Greater Understanding of the Willingness to Request an Accommodation: Can Requesters' Beliefs Disable the Americans with Disabilities Act? , 2001 .

[13]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  Developing dual user interfaces for integrating blind and sighted users: the HOMER UIMS , 1995, CHI '95.

[14]  David R. Flatla,et al.  "So that's what you see": building understanding with personalized simulations of colour vision deficiency , 2012, ASSETS '12.

[15]  Richard E. Ladner,et al.  Freedom to roam: a study of mobile device adoption and accessibility for people with visual and motor disabilities , 2009, Assets '09.

[16]  Rob Miller,et al.  VizWiz: nearly real-time answers to visual questions , 2010, UIST.

[17]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Universal Usability , 2000, UBIQ.

[18]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Making work visible , 1995, CACM.

[19]  Anne Marie Piper,et al.  Designing audio-enhanced paper photos for older adult emotional wellbeing in communication therapy , 2014, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..