Compressive-sensing data reconstruction for structural health monitoring: a machine-learning approach

Compressive sensing has been studied and applied in structural health monitoring for data acquisition and reconstruction, wireless data transmission, structural modal identification, and spare damage identification. The key issue in compressive sensing is finding the optimal solution for sparse optimization. In the past several years, many algorithms have been proposed in the field of applied mathematics. In this article, we propose a machine learning–based approach to solve the compressive-sensing data-reconstruction problem. By treating a computation process as a data flow, the solving process of compressive sensing–based data reconstruction is formalized into a standard supervised-learning task. The prior knowledge, i.e. the basis matrix and the compressive sensing–sampled signals, is used as the input and the target of the network; the basis coefficient matrix is embedded as the parameters of a certain layer; and the objective function of conventional compressive sensing is set as the loss function of the network. Regularized by l1-norm, these basis coefficients are optimized to reduce the error between the original compressive sensing–sampled signals and the masked reconstructed signals with a common optimization algorithm. In addition, the proposed network is able to handle complex bases, such as a Fourier basis. Benefiting from the nature of a multi-neuron layer, multiple signal channels can be reconstructed simultaneously. Meanwhile, the disassembled use of a large-scale basis makes the method memory-efficient. A numerical example of multiple sinusoidal waves and an example of field-test wireless data from a suspension bridge are carried out to illustrate the data-reconstruction ability of the proposed approach. The results show that high reconstruction accuracy can be obtained by the machine learning–based approach. In addition, the parameters of the network have clear meanings; the inference of the mapping between input and output is fully transparent, making the compressive-sensing data-reconstruction neural network interpretable.

[1]  Hui Li,et al.  Sparse l1 optimization‐based identification approach for the distribution of moving heavy vehicle loads on cable‐stayed bridges , 2016 .

[2]  Michael B. Wakin,et al.  Modal Analysis With Compressive Measurements , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[3]  Michael Unser,et al.  Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Inverse Problems in Imaging , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  Xigang Zhang,et al.  Research and practice of health monitoring for long-spanbridges in the mainland of China , 2015 .

[5]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  NESTA: A Fast and Accurate First-Order Method for Sparse Recovery , 2009, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[6]  Yongchao Yang,et al.  Output-only modal identification by compressed sensing: Non-uniform low-rate random sampling , 2015 .

[7]  M. Yuan,et al.  Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables , 2006 .

[8]  Chun-Liang Li,et al.  One Network to Solve Them All — Solving Linear Inverse Problems Using Deep Projection Models , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[9]  David L Donoho,et al.  Compressed sensing , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[10]  Jonas Adler,et al.  Solving ill-posed inverse problems using iterative deep neural networks , 2017, ArXiv.

[11]  Gregory Shakhnarovich,et al.  Learning Representations for Automatic Colorization , 2016, ECCV.

[12]  C. D. Zhang,et al.  Comparative studies on damage identification with Tikhonov regularization and sparse regularization , 2016 .

[13]  D. Donoho,et al.  Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Ting Sun,et al.  Single-pixel imaging via compressive sampling , 2008, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[15]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  ALGORITHMS FOR SIMULTANEOUS SPARSE APPROXIMATION , 2006 .

[16]  Yan Yu,et al.  Compressive sampling–based data loss recovery for wireless sensor networks used in civil structural health monitoring , 2013 .

[17]  Yin Zhang,et al.  A Fast Algorithm for Sparse Reconstruction Based on Shrinkage, Subspace Optimization, and Continuation , 2010, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[18]  Jerome P. Lynch,et al.  Utilizing the cochlea as a bio-inspired compressive sensing technique , 2013 .

[19]  Yin Zhang,et al.  Fixed-Point Continuation for l1-Minimization: Methodology and Convergence , 2008, SIAM J. Optim..

[20]  Jonathan Le Roux,et al.  Deep Unfolding: Model-Based Inspiration of Novel Deep Architectures , 2014, ArXiv.

[21]  Hui Li,et al.  Compressive sensing of wireless sensors based on group sparse optimization for structural health monitoring , 2018 .

[22]  Anna C. Gilbert,et al.  Compressed sensing embedded in an operational wireless sensor network to achieve energy efficiency in long-term monitoring applications , 2014 .

[23]  Zilong Zou,et al.  Embedding Compressive Sensing-Based Data Loss Recovery Algorithm Into Wireless Smart Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring , 2015, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[24]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning representations by back-propagating errors , 1986, Nature.

[25]  Ruigen Yao,et al.  Compressive sensing based structural damage detection and localization using theoretical and metaheuristic statistics , 2017 .

[26]  Yi-Qing Ni,et al.  Technology developments in structural health monitoring of large-scale bridges , 2005 .

[27]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring: A Machine Learning Perspective , 2012 .

[28]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[29]  Jun Sun,et al.  Compressive data gathering for large-scale wireless sensor networks , 2009, MobiCom '09.

[30]  Eleni Chatzi,et al.  Vibration monitoring via spectro-temporal compressive sensing for wireless sensor networks , 2017, Life-Cycle of Structural Systems.

[31]  Jianwei Ma,et al.  Single-Pixel Remote Sensing , 2009, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[32]  Mário A. T. Figueiredo,et al.  Gradient Projection for Sparse Reconstruction: Application to Compressed Sensing and Other Inverse Problems , 2007, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[33]  OU Jinping,et al.  Structural Damage Identification Based on Substructure Sensitivity and l 1 Sparse Regularization , 2012 .

[34]  Felix J. Herrmann,et al.  Fighting the Curse of Dimensionality: Compressive Sensing in Exploration Seismology , 2012, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[35]  Shun Weng,et al.  L1 regularization approach to structural damage detection using frequency data , 2015 .

[36]  Luca Benini,et al.  Compressive Sensing Optimization for Signal Ensembles in WSNs , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[37]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep ADMM-Net for Compressive Sensing MRI , 2016, NIPS.

[38]  Alexei A. Efros,et al.  Colorful Image Colorization , 2016, ECCV.

[39]  Alison B. Flatau,et al.  Review Paper: Health Monitoring of Civil Infrastructure , 2003 .

[40]  Jinping Ou,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring in mainland China: Review and Future Trends , 2010 .

[41]  Krishna M. Kavi,et al.  A Formal Definition of Data Flow Graph Models , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[42]  Marc Teboulle,et al.  A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems , 2009, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[43]  James L Beck,et al.  Compressive sampling for accelerometer signals in structural health monitoring , 2011 .

[44]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Sparse Reconstruction by Separable Approximation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[45]  J M W Brownjohn,et al.  Structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[46]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Smart sensing technology: opportunities and challenges , 2004 .

[47]  E.J. Candes Compressive Sampling , 2022 .

[48]  Ying Wang,et al.  Damage Identification Scheme Based on Compressive Sensing , 2015, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[49]  Yuequan Bao,et al.  Selection of regularization parameter for l1-regularized damage detection , 2018, Journal of Sound and Vibration.

[50]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[51]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  A new compressive imaging camera architecture using optical-domain compression , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[52]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  A review of nonlinear dynamics applications to structural health monitoring , 2008 .

[53]  Max Welling,et al.  Recurrent Inference Machines for Solving Inverse Problems , 2017, ArXiv.

[54]  J. Tropp Algorithms for simultaneous sparse approximation. Part II: Convex relaxation , 2006, Signal Process..

[55]  Massimo Fornasier,et al.  Recovery Algorithms for Vector-Valued Data with Joint Sparsity Constraints , 2008, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[56]  Tom Goldstein,et al.  The Split Bregman Method for L1-Regularized Problems , 2009, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[57]  Jeong-Beom Ihn,et al.  Pitch-catch Active Sensing Methods in Structural Health Monitoring for Aircraft Structures , 2008 .

[58]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Algorithms for simultaneous sparse approximation. Part I: Greedy pursuit , 2006, Signal Process..

[59]  Joan Bruna,et al.  Super-Resolution with Deep Convolutional Sufficient Statistics , 2015, ICLR.

[60]  Lawrence Carin,et al.  Bayesian Compressive Sensing , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[61]  Yongchao Yang,et al.  Harnessing data structure for recovery of randomly missing structural vibration responses time history: Sparse representation versus low-rank structure , 2016 .