Permutation Tests for Comparing Inequality Measures

ABSTRACT Asymptotic and bootstrap tests for inequality measures are known to perform poorly in finite samples when the underlying distribution is heavy-tailed. We propose Monte Carlo permutation and bootstrap methods for the problem of testing the equality of inequality measures between two samples. Results cover the Generalized Entropy class, which includes Theil’s index, the Atkinson class of indices, and the Gini index. We analyze finite-sample and asymptotic conditions for the validity of the proposed methods, and we introduce a convenient rescaling to improve finite-sample performance. Simulation results show that size correct inference can be obtained with our proposed methods despite heavy tails if the underlying distributions are sufficiently close in the upper tails. Substantial reduction in size distortion is achieved more generally. Studentized rescaled Monte Carlo permutation tests outperform the competing methods we consider in terms of power.

[1]  Emmanuel Flachaire,et al.  Statistical Methods for Distributional Analysis , 2015 .

[2]  Joseph P. Romano,et al.  EXACT AND ASYMPTOTICALLY ROBUST PERMUTATION TESTS , 2013, 1304.5939.

[3]  Russell Davidson,et al.  Statistical Inference in the Presence of Heavy Tails , 2012 .

[4]  Russell Davidson,et al.  Reliable Inference for the Gini Index , 2009 .

[5]  K. J. Garderen,et al.  Edgeworth expansions and normalizing transforms for inequality measures , 2009 .

[6]  F. Cowell Income Distribution and Inequality , 2007 .

[7]  Debopam Bhattacharya,et al.  Inference on inequality from household survey data , 2007 .

[8]  Jean-Marie Dufour,et al.  Monte Carlo tests with nuisance parameters: a general approach to finite-sample inference and nonstandard , 2006 .

[9]  Debopam Bhattacharya,et al.  Asymptotic inference from multi-stage samples , 2005 .

[10]  F. Cowell,et al.  Income distribution and inequality measurement: The problem of extreme values , 2007 .

[11]  R. Davidson,et al.  Asymptotic and Bootstrap Inference for Inequality and Poverty Measures , 2007 .

[12]  Dennis D. Boos,et al.  Comparing variances and other measures of dispersion , 2004 .

[13]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Statistical Size Distributions in Economics and Actuarial Sciences , 2004, Technometrics.

[14]  F. Bourguignon On the Measurement of Inequality , 2003 .

[15]  Mark Trede,et al.  Tails of Lorenz curves , 2002 .

[16]  Buhong Zheng,et al.  Statistical inference for testing inequality indices with dependent samples , 2001 .

[17]  A. Deaton,et al.  The Analysis of Household Surveys (Reissue Edition with a New Preface): A Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy , 2018 .

[18]  A. Deaton The Analysis of Household Surveys : A Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy , 1997 .

[19]  E. Mammen The Bootstrap and Edgeworth Expansion , 1997 .

[20]  W. Loh,et al.  A comparison of tests of equality of variances , 1996 .

[21]  Mark Trede,et al.  Evaluating Parametric Income Distribution Models , 1996 .

[22]  Joseph P. Romano On the behaviour of randomization tests without the group invariance assumption , 1990 .

[23]  P. Janssen,et al.  Resampling from centered data in the two-sample problem , 1989 .

[24]  James B. McDonald,et al.  Some Generalized Functions for the Size Distribution of Income , 1984 .

[25]  H. Alker,et al.  On measuring inequality. , 1964, Behavioral science.

[26]  M. Dwass Modified Randomization Tests for Nonparametric Hypotheses , 1957 .

[27]  E. Pitman Significance Tests Which May be Applied to Samples from Any Populations , 1937 .