Affordable Development and Demonstration of a Small Nuclear Thermal Rocket (NTR) Engine and Stage: How Small Is Big Enough?

The Nuclear Thermal Rocket (NTR) derives its energy from fission of uranium-235 atoms contained within fuel elements that comprise the engine's reactor core. It generates high thrust and has a specific impulse potential of approximately 900 specific impulse - a 100 percent increase over today's best chemical rockets. The Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) project, funded by NASA's Advanced Exploration Systems (AES) program, includes five key task activities: (1) Recapture, demonstration, and validation of heritage graphite composite (GC) fuel (selected as the Lead Fuel option); (2) Engine Conceptual Design; (3) Operating Requirements Definition; (4) Identification of Affordable Options for Ground Testing; and (5) Formulation of an Affordable Development Strategy. During fiscal year (FY) 2014, a preliminary Design Development Test and Evaluation (DDT&E) plan and schedule for NTP development was outlined by the NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC), Department of Energy (DOE) and industry that involved significant system-level demonstration projects that included Ground Technology Demonstration (GTD) tests at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS), followed by a Flight Technology Demonstration (FTD) mission. To reduce cost for the GTD tests and FTD mission, small NTR engines, in either the 7.5 or 16.5 kilopound-force thrust class, were considered. Both engine options used GC fuel and a common fuel element (FE) design. The small approximately 7.5 kilopound-force criticality-limited engine produces approximately157 thermal megawatts and its core is configured with parallel rows of hexagonal-shaped FEs and tie tubes (TTs) with a FE to TT ratio of approximately 1:1. The larger approximately 16.5 kilopound-force Small Nuclear Rocket Engine (SNRE), developed by Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) at the end of the Rover program, produces approximately 367 thermal megawatts and has a FE to TT ratio of approximately 2:1. Although both engines use a common 35-inch (approximately 89-centimeters) -long FE, the SNRE's larger diameter core contains approximately 300 more FEs needed to produce an additional 210 thermal megawatts of power. To reduce the cost of the FTD mission, a simple one-burn lunar flyby mission was considered to reduce the liquid hydrogen (LH2) propellant loading, the stage size and complexity. Use of existing and flight proven liquid rocket and stage hardware (e.g., from the RL10B-2 engine and Delta Cryogenic Second Stage) was also maximized to further aid affordability. This paper examines the pros and cons of using these two small engine options, including their potential to support future human exploration missions to the Moon, near Earth asteroids (NEA), and Mars, and recommends a preferred size. It also provides a preliminary assessment of the key activities, development options, and schedule required to affordably build, ground test and fly a small NTR engine and stage within a 10-year timeframe.

[1]  J. W. Taylor,et al.  Development of carbide--carbon composite fuel elements for Rover reactors , 1972 .

[2]  John Baker,et al.  A Minimal Architecture for Human Journeys to Mars , 2015 .

[3]  Stanley K. Borowski,et al.  The Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Stage (NTPS): A Key Space Asset for Human Exploration and Commercial Missions to the Moon , 2013 .

[4]  Bruce G. Schnitzler,et al.  Thermal Hydraulics and Structural Analysis of the Small Nuclear Rocket Engine (SNRE) Core , 2007 .

[5]  William J. Emrich.  Nuclear Thermal Rocket Element Environmental Simulator (NTREES) Upgrade Activities , 2012 .

[6]  Raymond G. Merrill,et al.  Mars conjunction crewed missions with a reusable hybrid architecture , 2015, 2015 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[7]  Stanley K. Borowski,et al.  Affordable Development and Demonstration of a Small NTR engine and Stage: A Preliminary NASA, DOE, and Industry Assessment , 2015 .

[8]  Jorge Santiago,et al.  Evolution of the RL10 liquid rocket engine for a new upperstage application , 1996 .

[9]  Stanley K. Borowski,et al.  Modular Growth NTR Space Transportation System for Future NASA Human Lunar, NEA and Mars Exploration Missions , 2012 .

[10]  Stanley K. Borowski,et al.  Neutronics Models and Analysis of the Small Nuclear Rocket Engine (SNRE) , 2007 .

[11]  Stanley K. Borowski,et al.  "7-Launch" NTR Space Transportation Option for NASA's Mars Design Reference Architecture (DRA) 5.0 , 2009 .

[12]  David Coote,et al.  Review of Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Ground Test Options , 2015 .

[13]  Brian C. Jolly,et al.  Extrusion Development of Graphite-Based Composite Fuel for Nuclear Thermal Propulsion , 2015 .

[14]  Stanley K. Borowski,et al.  25,000-lbf Thrust Engine Options Based on the Small Nuclear Rocket Engine Design , 2009 .

[15]  Brian C. Jolly,et al.  Coating Development on Graphite-Based Composite Fuel for Nuclear Thermal Propulsion , 2015 .

[16]  James E. Fittje.  Upgrades to the NESS (Nuclear Engine System Simulation) Code , 2007 .

[17]  J. M. Napier.  Nerva Fuel Element Development Program Summary Report - July 1966 through June 1972 Impregnation Studies , 1973 .

[18]  Stanley K. Borowski,et al.  Subscale Validation of the Subsurface Active Filtration of Exhaust (SAFE) Approach to NTP Ground Testing , 2015 .

[19]  L. L. Lyon,et al.  Performance of (U,Zr)C-graphite (composite) and of (U,Zr)C (carbide) fuel elements in the Nuclear Furnace 1 test reactor , 1973 .

[20]  Stanley K. Borowski,et al.  Lower Thrust Engine Options Based on the Small Nuclear Rocket Engine Design , 2011 .

[21]  S. Hoffman,et al.  Human exploration of Mars, Design Reference Architecture 5.0 , 2010, 2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[22]  Bruce G. Schnitzler,et al.  Parametric Analyses of a 75 kN Thrust Class Composite Fuel Based NTR Engine , 2014 .

[23]  Stanley K. Borowski,et al.  Ground Testing a Nuclear Thermal Rocket: Design of a sub-scale demonstration experiment , 2012 .

[24]  A. J. Caputo,et al.  Fabrication and characterization of vapor-deposited niobium and zirconium carbides☆ , 1977 .

[25]  David K. Zerkle,et al.  Safe Testing of Nuclear Rockets , 2001 .