Uncertainty analysis using corrected first‐order approximation method

Application of uncertainty and reliability analysis is an essential part of many problems related to modeling and decision making in the area of environmental and water resources engineering. Computational efficiency, understandability, and easier application have made the first-order approximation (FOA) method a favored tool for uncertainty analysis. In many instances, situations may arise where the accuracy of FOA estimates becomes questionable. Often the FOA application is considered acceptable if the coefficient of variation of the uncertain parameter(s) is <0.2, but this criterion is not correct in all the situations. Analytical as well as graphical relations for relative error are developed and presented for a generic power function that can be used as a guide for judging the suitability of the FOA for a specified acceptable error of estimation. Further, these analytical and graphical relations enable FOA estimates for means and variances of model components to be corrected to their true values. Using these corrected values of means and variances for model components, one can determine the exact values of the mean and variance of an output random variable. This technique is applicable when an output variable is a function of several independent random variables in multiplicative, additive, or in combined (multiplicative and additive) forms. Two examples are given to demonstrate the application of the technique.

[1]  William W. Walker,et al.  A SENSITIVITY AND ERROR ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK FOR LAKE EUTROPHICATION MODELING) , 1982 .

[2]  Larry W. Mays,et al.  Risk models for flood levee design , 1981 .

[3]  Yan-Gang Zhao,et al.  NEW APPROXIMATIONS FOR SORM : PART 1 By , 1999 .

[4]  Stephen J. Burges,et al.  Approximate Error Bounds for Simulated Hydrographs , 1981 .

[5]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  PROBABILISTIC METHODS IN STREAM QUALITY MANAGEMENT , 1975 .

[6]  C. T. Haan,et al.  Evaluation of Uncertainty in Estimated Flow and Phosphorus Loads by FHANTM , 1996 .

[7]  R. P. Canale,et al.  Comparison of first‐order error analysis and Monte Carlo Simulation in time‐dependent lake eutrophication models , 1981 .

[8]  B. Bates,et al.  Nonlinear, discrete flood event models, 3. Analysis of prediction uncertainty , 1988 .

[9]  B. Bates Nonlinear, discrete flood event models, 2. Assessment of statistical nonlinearity , 1988 .

[10]  Michael D. Dettinger,et al.  First order analysis of uncertainty in numerical models of groundwater flow part: 1. Mathematical development , 1981 .

[11]  D. G. Watts,et al.  Relative Curvature Measures of Nonlinearity , 1980 .

[12]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  A comparison of sensitivity analysis and error analysis based on a stream ecosystem model , 1981 .

[13]  M. Cesare First‐Order Analysis of Open‐Channel Flow , 1991 .

[14]  R. H. Gardner,et al.  Parameter Uncertainty and Model Predictions: A Review of Monte Carlo Results , 1983 .

[15]  Y. Tung Mellin Transform Applied to Uncertainty Analysis in Hydrology/Hydraulics , 1990 .

[16]  B. Sagar,et al.  Galerkin Finite Element Procedure for analyzing flow through random media , 1978 .

[17]  S. Burges ANALYSIS OF UNCERTAINTY IN FLOOD PLAIN MAPPING , 1979 .

[18]  George Kuczera,et al.  On the validity of first-order prediction limits for conceptual hydrologic models , 1988 .

[19]  R. Moore,et al.  A distribution function approach to rainfall runoff modeling , 1981 .

[20]  Edward A. McBean,et al.  Optimization Modeling of Water Quality in an Uncertain Environment , 1985 .

[21]  J. Stiffler Reliability estimation , 1996 .

[22]  Peggy A. Johnson Uncertainty of Hydraulic Parameters , 1996 .

[23]  Hamdani Saidi,et al.  Predictive accuracy determination applied to a linear model phosphorus loading resulting from urban runoff , 1984 .

[24]  Bill Batchelor,et al.  Stochastic Risk Assessment of Sites Contaminated by Hazardous Wastes , 1998 .

[25]  Yeou-Koung Tung,et al.  UNCERTAINTY AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSES OF PIT-MIGRATION MODEL , 1993 .

[26]  Arthur C. Miller,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis of Dissolved Oxygen Model , 1982 .

[27]  J. L. Devary,et al.  Pore velocity estimation uncertainties , 1982 .

[28]  A. M. Hasofer,et al.  Exact and Invariant Second-Moment Code Format , 1974 .

[29]  C. Melching,et al.  Improved first-order uncertainty method for water-quality modeling , 1992 .

[30]  R. Charbeneau,et al.  Probabilistic Soil Contamination Exposure Assessment Procedures , 1990 .

[31]  Wilson H. Tang,et al.  Risk-Safety Factor Relation for Storm Sewer Design , 1976 .

[32]  L. Mays,et al.  Hydraulic Uncertainties in Flood Levee Capacity , 1986 .

[33]  C. S. Melching An improved first-order reliability approach for assessing uncertainties in hydrologic modeling , 1992 .

[34]  L. Townley,et al.  Computationally Efficient Algorithms for Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty Propagation in Numerical Models of Groundwater Flow , 1985 .

[35]  Micha Hofri,et al.  Probabilistic Analysis of Algorithms , 1987, Texts and Monographs in Computer Science.