Protein mechanics: a route from structure to function

In order to better understand the mechanical properties of proteins, we have developed simulation tools which enable these properties to be analysed on a residue-by-residue basis. Although these calculations are relatively expensive with all-atom protein models, good results can be obtained much faster using coarse-grained approaches. The results show that proteins are surprisingly heterogeneous from a mechanical point of view and that functionally important residues often exhibit unusual mechanical behaviour. This finding offers a novel means for detecting functional sites and also potentially provides a route for understanding the links between structure and function in more general terms.

[1]  Zheng Yuan,et al.  Flexibility analysis of enzyme active sites by crystallographic temperature factors. , 2003, Protein engineering.

[2]  Hendrik Dietz,et al.  Anisotropic deformation response of single protein molecules , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  R L Jernigan,et al.  Cooperative fluctuations and subunit communication in tryptophan synthase. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[4]  Valentina Tozzini,et al.  Coarse-grained models for proteins. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[5]  Richard Lavery,et al.  Structure and mechanics of single biomolecules: experiment and simulation , 2002 .

[6]  R Lavery,et al.  Stretched and overwound DNA forms a Pauling-like structure with exposed bases. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  D. Christianson,et al.  Detoxification of environmental mutagens and carcinogens: structure, mechanism, and evolution of liver epoxide hydrolase. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Martin Zacharias,et al.  Protein–protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side‐chain flexibility , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[9]  Hendrik Dietz,et al.  Protein structure by mechanical triangulation , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  R. Lavery,et al.  DNA: An Extensible Molecule , 1996, Science.

[11]  B. Halle,et al.  Flexibility and packing in proteins , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Guillaume Paillard,et al.  Analyzing protein-DNA recognition mechanisms. , 2004, Structure.

[13]  Janet M. Thornton,et al.  The Catalytic Site Atlas: a resource of catalytic sites and residues identified in enzymes using structural data , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[14]  D. Case,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Nucleic Acids with a Generalized Born Solvation Model , 2000 .

[15]  R Lavery,et al.  Local DNA stretching mimics the distortion caused by the TATA box-binding protein. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Sophie Sacquin-Mora,et al.  Investigating the local flexibility of functional residues in hemoproteins. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[17]  Tirion,et al.  Large Amplitude Elastic Motions in Proteins from a Single-Parameter, Atomic Analysis. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[18]  Fabien Cailliez,et al.  Probing protein mechanics: residue-level properties and their use in defining domains. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[19]  Ivet Bahar,et al.  Elastic network models for understanding biomolecular machinery: from enzymes to supramolecular assemblies , 2005, Physical biology.

[20]  Heinz Sklenar,et al.  JUMNA (junction minimisation of nucleic acids) , 1995 .

[21]  Ivet Bahar,et al.  Functional motions of influenza virus hemagglutinin: a structure-based analytical approach. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[22]  Sophie Sacquin-Mora,et al.  Locating the active sites of enzymes using mechanical properties , 2007, Proteins.

[23]  J. Kendrew,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Model of the Myoglobin Molecule Obtained by X-Ray Analysis , 1958, Nature.

[24]  Jeremy C. Smith,et al.  The role of dynamics in enzyme activity. , 2003, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[25]  M. Zacharias,et al.  Accounting for loop flexibility during protein–protein docking , 2005, Proteins.

[26]  I. Bahar,et al.  Coarse-grained normal mode analysis in structural biology. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[27]  N. O. Manning,et al.  The protein data bank , 1999, Genetica.

[28]  I. Bahar,et al.  Coupling between catalytic site and collective dynamics: a requirement for mechanochemical activity of enzymes. , 2005, Structure.

[29]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[30]  P. Kollman,et al.  How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules? , 2000 .

[31]  Lennart Nilsson,et al.  Advances in biomolecular simulations: methodology and recent applications , 2003, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[32]  M. Karplus,et al.  Molecular dynamics and protein function. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[34]  Modesto Orozco,et al.  A consensus view of protein dynamics , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  O. Ptitsyn,et al.  Protein folding and protein evolution: common folding nucleus in different subfamilies of c-type cytochromes? , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  Gail J. Bartlett,et al.  Analysis of catalytic residues in enzyme active sites. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.