Role of suppression and retro-cochlear processes in comodulation masking release.

Recent physiological studies suggest that comodulation masking release (CMR) could be a consequence of wideband inhibition at the level of the cochlear nucleus. The present study investigates whether the existence region of psychophysical CMR is comparable to the inhibitory areas of units showing a physiological correlate of CMR. Since the inhibitory areas are similar to suppressive regions at the level of the basilar membrane, the amount of CMR that can be accounted for by suppression was determined by predicting the data with a model incorporating a peripheral nonlinearity. A CMR of up to 6 dB could still be experimentally observed for a flanking band (FB) four octaves below the on-frequency masker (OFM). For FB frequencies below the OFM, the suggested model predicts CMR equal to the measured CMR for high levels of the FB. The model underestimates the magnitude of CMR for midlevels of the FB, indicating that suppression alone cannot account for CMR. The data are consistent with the hypothesis that wideband inhibition plays a role in CMR.

[1]  N. Viemeister Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  B. Kollmeier,et al.  Within-channel cues in comodulation masking release (CMR): experiments and model predictions using a modulation-filterbank model. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Joseph W. Hall,et al.  Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  D. Ryugo,et al.  Glycine immunoreactivity of multipolar neurons in the ventral cochlear nucleus which project to the dorsal cochlear nucleus , 1999, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  I. Nelken,et al.  Representation of Tone in Fluctuating Maskers in the Ascending Auditory System , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  E. Lopez-Poveda,et al.  A computational algorithm for computing nonlinear auditory frequency selectivity. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  R. Shannon Two-tone unmasking and suppression in a forward-masking situation. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Lateral suppression and inhibition in the cochlear nucleus of the cat. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Suppression and the upward spread of masking. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  M. Sachs,et al.  Two-tone inhibition in auditory-nerve fibers. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  J. Hall,et al.  The effect of across-frequency differences in masking level on spectro-temporal pattern analysis. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[14]  J H Grose,et al.  Effects of flanking band proximity, number, and modulation pattern on comodulation masking release. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  D. McFadden,et al.  Comodulation masking release: effects of varying the level, duration, and time delay of the cue band. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Forward masking: adaptation or integration? , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  T. Irino,et al.  A time-domain, level-dependent auditory filter: The gammachirp , 1997 .

[18]  A. Kohlrausch,et al.  Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. I. Model structure. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Ian M. Winter,et al.  Responses of Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus Neurons to Signals in the Presence of Modulated Maskers , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  J H Grose,et al.  Comodulation masking release for multicomponent signals. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  A R Palmer,et al.  Level dependence of cochlear nucleus onset unit responses and facilitation by second tones or broadband noise. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Philip H Smith,et al.  Temporal and Binaural Properties in Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus and Its Output Tract , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  G. Klump,et al.  Signal detection in amplitude‐modulated maskers. I. Behavioural auditory thresholds in a songbird , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[24]  Daniel Pressnitzer,et al.  The psychophysics and physiology of comodulation masking release , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  T. Houtgast Psychophysical evidence for lateral inhibition in hearing. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  L. Robles,et al.  Two-tone suppression in the basilar membrane of the cochlea: mechanical basis of auditory-nerve rate suppression. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  A. Nieder,et al.  Signal detection in amplitude‐modulated maskers. II. Processing in the songbird's auditory forebrain , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[28]  Ray Meddis,et al.  Physiological Correlates of Comodulation Masking Release in the Mammalian Ventral Cochlear Nucleus , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  C. D. Geisler,et al.  Two-tone suppression in auditory nerve of the cat: rate-intensity and temporal analyses. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  B C Moore,et al.  Comodulation masking release as a function of level. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  S. Hofer,et al.  Within- and Across-Channel Processing in Auditory Masking: A Physiological Study in the Songbird Forebrain , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  E. de Boer,et al.  Masking and Discrimination , 1966 .

[33]  B C Moore,et al.  Comodulation masking release (CMR): effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level, and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking band. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  K. A. Davis Contralateral Effects and Binaural Interactions in Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus , 2005, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[35]  Nigel P. Cooper,et al.  Compression in the Peripheral Auditory System , 2004 .

[36]  Israel Nelken,et al.  Responses of auditory-cortex neurons to structural features of natural sounds , 1999, Nature.

[37]  M F Cohen Comodulation masking release over a three octave range. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  I. Winter,et al.  Frequency extent of two-tone facilitation in onset units in the ventral cochlear nucleus. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  B C Moore,et al.  Comodulation masking release for various monaural and binaural combinations of the signal, on-frequency, and flanking bands. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.