Evaluation of Generalized Born Models for Large Scale Affinity Prediction of Cyclodextrin Host-Guest Complexes

Binding affinity prediction with implicit solvent models remains a challenge in virtual screening for drug discovery. In order to assess the predictive power of implicit solvent models in docking techniques with Amber scoring, three generalized Born models (GBHCT, GBOBCI, and GBOBCII) available in Dock 6.7 were utilized, for determining the binding affinity of a large set of β-cyclodextrin complexes with 75 neutral guest molecules. The results were compared to potential of mean force (PMF) free energy calculations with four GB models (GBStill, GBHCT, GBOBCI, and GBOBCII) and to experimental data. Docking results yield similar accuracy to the computationally demanding PMF method with umbrella sampling. Neither docking nor PMF calculations reproduce the experimental binding affinities, however, as indicated by a small Spearman rank order coefficient (∼0.5). The binding energies obtained from GB models were decomposed further into individual contributions of the binding partners and solvent environments and compared to explicit solvent simulations for five complexes allowing for rationalizing the difference between explicit and implicit solvent models. An important observation is that the explicit solvent screens the interaction between host and guest much stronger than GB models. In contrast, the screening in GB models is too strong in solutes, leading to overestimation of short-range interactions and too strong binding. It is difficult to envision a way of overcoming these two opposite effects.

[1]  Berk Hess,et al.  LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations , 1997, J. Comput. Chem..

[2]  Gang Fu,et al.  PubChem Substance and Compound databases , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[3]  Chandra S Verma,et al.  Prion and water: tight and dynamical hydration sites have a key role in structural stability. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Carl Caleman,et al.  GROMACS molecule & liquid database , 2012, Bioinform..

[5]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Automated docking with grid‐based energy evaluation , 1992 .

[6]  William L. Jorgensen,et al.  Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[7]  István Horváth,et al.  Mobility-based prediction of hydration structures of protein surfaces , 2015, Bioinform..

[8]  J. Bajorath,et al.  Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[9]  Christophe Chipot,et al.  Molecular dynamics study of the inclusion of cholesterol into cyclodextrins. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[10]  Carl Caleman,et al.  Thermodynamics of hydronium and hydroxide surface solvation. , 2014 .

[11]  Y. Inoue,et al.  Complexation Thermodynamics of Cyclodextrins. , 1998, Chemical reviews.

[12]  Carsten Kutzner,et al.  GROMACS 4:  Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation. , 2008, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[13]  Pavel Hobza,et al.  Ligand conformational and solvation/desolvation free energy in protein-ligand complex formation. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[14]  Yoshihisa Inoue,et al.  Chiral Recognition Thermodynamics of β-Cyclodextrin: The Thermodynamic Origin of Enantioselectivity and the Enthalpy−Entropy Compensation Effect , 2000 .

[15]  Haiyang Zhang,et al.  Cooperative Binding of Cyclodextrin Dimers to Isoflavone Analogues Elucidated by Free Energy Calculations , 2014, The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces.

[16]  Christian Kramer,et al.  Improving Docking Results via Reranking of Ensembles of Ligand Poses in Multiple X-ray Protein Conformations with MM-GBSA , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[17]  David L Mobley,et al.  Treating entropy and conformational changes in implicit solvent simulations of small molecules. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[18]  R. Swendsen,et al.  THE weighted histogram analysis method for free‐energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method , 1992 .

[19]  Jurriaan Huskens,et al.  Beta-cyclodextrin host-guest complexes probed under thermodynamic equilibrium: thermodynamics and AFM force spectroscopy. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[20]  C. Cézard,et al.  Molecular dynamics studies of native and substituted cyclodextrins in different media: 1. Charge derivation and force field performances. , 2011, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[21]  Gregory D. Hawkins,et al.  Parametrized Models of Aqueous Free Energies of Solvation Based on Pairwise Descreening of Solute Atomic Charges from a Dielectric Medium , 1996 .

[22]  Peter M. Kasson,et al.  GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit , 2013, Bioinform..

[23]  M. Feig Kinetics from Implicit Solvent Simulations of Biomolecules as a Function of Viscosity. , 2007, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[24]  Franca Fraternali,et al.  Protein-water interactions in MD simulations: POPS/POPSCOMP solvent accessibility analysis, solvation forces and hydration sites. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[25]  I. Kuntz,et al.  DOCK 6: combining techniques to model RNA-small molecule complexes. , 2009, RNA.

[26]  M. Parrinello,et al.  Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[27]  Richard A. Friesner,et al.  First-Shell Solvation of Ion Pairs: Correction of Systematic Errors in Implicit Solvent Models† , 2004 .

[28]  J. Ponder,et al.  An efficient newton‐like method for molecular mechanics energy minimization of large molecules , 1987 .

[29]  D. Case,et al.  Exploring protein native states and large‐scale conformational changes with a modified generalized born model , 2004, Proteins.

[30]  A. Badwan,et al.  Thermodynamic enthalpy–entropy compensation effects observed in the complexation of basic drug substrates with β-cyclodextrin , 2007 .

[31]  Arthur J. Olson,et al.  Virtual screening of integrase inhibitors by large scale binding free energy calculations: the SAMPL4 challenge , 2014, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[32]  Alexey V. Onufriev,et al.  Author ’ s personal copy CHAPTER 7 Implicit Solvent Models in Molecular Dynamics Simulations : A Brief Overview , 2008 .

[33]  Carl Caleman,et al.  Force Field Benchmark of Organic Liquids: Density, Enthalpy of Vaporization, Heat Capacities, Surface Tension, Isothermal Compressibility, Volumetric Expansion Coefficient, and Dielectric Constant , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[34]  F A Quiocho,et al.  Refined 1.8-A structure reveals the mode of binding of beta-cyclodextrin to the maltodextrin binding protein. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[35]  Haiyang Zhang,et al.  Molecular recognition in different environments: β-cyclodextrin dimer formation in organic solvents. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[36]  Lars Olsen,et al.  Binding affinities in the SAMPL3 trypsin and host–guest blind tests estimated with the MM/PBSA and LIE methods , 2012, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[37]  Xiaohua Zhang,et al.  Toward Fully Automated High Performance Computing Drug Discovery: A Massively Parallel Virtual Screening Pipeline for Docking and Molecular Mechanics/Generalized Born Surface Area Rescoring to Improve Enrichment , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[38]  W. C. Still,et al.  The GB/SA Continuum Model for Solvation. A Fast Analytical Method for the Calculation of Approximate Born Radii , 1997 .

[39]  Samuel Genheden,et al.  Effect of explicit water molecules on ligand-binding affinities calculated with the MM/GBSA approach , 2014, Journal of Molecular Modeling.

[40]  David L. Mobley,et al.  FreeSolv: a database of experimental and calculated hydration free energies, with input files , 2014, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[41]  Carl Caleman,et al.  Organic molecules on the surface of water droplets--an energetic perspective. , 2012, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[42]  Martin Lepšík,et al.  Assessing the accuracy and performance of implicit solvent models for drug molecules: conformational ensemble approaches. , 2013, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[43]  Bert L. de Groot,et al.  g_wham—A Free Weighted Histogram Analysis Implementation Including Robust Error and Autocorrelation Estimates , 2010 .

[44]  P. Kollman,et al.  Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations. , 2006, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[45]  Florent Goujon,et al.  Energetic Competition Effects on Thermodynamic Properties of Association between β-CD and Fc Group: A Potential of Mean Force Approach , 2012 .

[46]  S. Costa,et al.  Complexation of the Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Nabumetone with Modified and Unmodified Cyclodextrins , 1999 .

[47]  Haiyang Zhang,et al.  Generalized Born and Explicit Solvent Models for Free Energy Calculations in Organic Solvents: Cyclodextrin Dimerization. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[48]  Kecheng Jie,et al.  Supramolecular Amphiphiles Based on Host‐Guest Molecular Recognition Motifs , 2015 .

[49]  B. Berne,et al.  Can a continuum solvent model reproduce the free energy landscape of a β-hairpin folding in water? , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  D. J. Price,et al.  Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[51]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[52]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Generalized Born model with a simple, robust molecular volume correction. , 2007, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[53]  J. Pople,et al.  Self—Consistent Molecular Orbital Methods. XII. Further Extensions of Gaussian—Type Basis Sets for Use in Molecular Orbital Studies of Organic Molecules , 1972 .

[54]  R. Levy,et al.  Large scale affinity calculations of cyclodextrin host-guest complexes: Understanding the role of reorganization in the molecular recognition process. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[55]  M Rarey,et al.  Detailed analysis of scoring functions for virtual screening. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[56]  Ronald M. Levy,et al.  AGBNP: An analytic implicit solvent model suitable for molecular dynamics simulations and high‐resolution modeling , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[57]  Ioan Andricioaei,et al.  On the calculation of entropy from covariance matrices of the atomic fluctuations , 2001 .

[58]  Tingjun Hou,et al.  Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 5. Improved docking performance using high solute dielectric constant MM/GBSA and MM/PBSA rescoring. , 2014, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[59]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Improved cyclodextrin-based receptors for camptothecin by inverse virtual screening. , 2007, Chemistry.

[60]  Charles L. Brooks,et al.  Performance comparison of generalized born and Poisson methods in the calculation of electrostatic solvation energies for protein structures , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[61]  Robert N. Goldberg,et al.  Thermodynamic and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Study of the Reactions of α- and β-Cyclodextrin with Acids, Aliphatic Amines, and Cyclic Alcohols , 1997 .

[62]  S. Genheden,et al.  The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities , 2015, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[63]  Franca Fraternali,et al.  Design and application of implicit solvent models in biomolecular simulations , 2014, Current opinion in structural biology.

[64]  Junmei Wang,et al.  Development and testing of a general amber force field , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[65]  M. Gilson,et al.  Calculation of cyclodextrin binding affinities: energy, entropy, and implications for drug design. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[66]  Samuel Genheden,et al.  MM/GBSA and LIE estimates of host–guest affinities: dependence on charges and solvation model , 2011, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[67]  David S. Wishart,et al.  DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[68]  B. Hess Determining the shear viscosity of model liquids from molecular dynamics simulations , 2002 .

[69]  Gerrit Groenhof,et al.  GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[70]  Robert N. Goldberg,et al.  Thermodynamic and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Study of the Interactions of .alpha.- and .beta.-Cyclodextrin with Model Substances: Phenethylamine, Ephedrines, and Related Substances , 1995 .

[71]  Richard H. Henchman,et al.  Water Determines the Structure and Dynamics of Proteins. , 2016, Chemical reviews.

[72]  Carlos Simmerling,et al.  Improved Generalized Born Solvent Model Parameters for Protein Simulations. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[73]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Integration of virtual and high-throughput screening , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[74]  Jacob Kongsted,et al.  How accurate are continuum solvation models for drug-like molecules? , 2009, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[75]  Jung-Hsin Lin,et al.  Bridging implicit and explicit solvent approaches for membrane electrostatics. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[76]  G. Torrie,et al.  Nonphysical sampling distributions in Monte Carlo free-energy estimation: Umbrella sampling , 1977 .

[77]  William J. Allen,et al.  DOCK 6: Impact of new features and current docking performance , 2015, J. Comput. Chem..

[78]  Bojan Zagrovic,et al.  Solvent viscosity dependence of the folding rate of a small protein: Distributed computing study , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[79]  Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin,et al.  Solvated docking: introducing water into the modelling of biomolecular complexes , 2006, Bioinform..

[80]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Using shape complementarity as an initial screen in designing ligands for a receptor binding site of known three-dimensional structure. , 1988, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[81]  Haiyang Zhang,et al.  Quantification of Solvent Contribution to the Stability of Noncovalent Complexes. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[82]  Michael Feig,et al.  Balancing an accurate representation of the molecular surface in generalized born formalisms with integrator stability in molecular dynamics simulations , 2006, J. Comput. Chem..

[83]  D. Case,et al.  Theory and applications of the generalized born solvation model in macromolecular simulations , 2000, Biopolymers.

[84]  Qiang Lü,et al.  Improving protein-ligand docking with flexible interfacial water molecules using SWRosettaLigand , 2015, Journal of Molecular Modeling.

[85]  Jing Qi,et al.  Effective Targeting of the Survivin Dimerization Interface with Small-Molecule Inhibitors. , 2016, Cancer research.

[86]  Y. Duan,et al.  Two-stage folding of HP-35 from ab initio simulations. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[87]  Emilio Gallicchio,et al.  The AGBNP2 Implicit Solvation Model. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[88]  Christoph A. Sotriffer,et al.  - Protein–Ligand Docking: From Basic Principles to Advanced Applications , 2015 .

[89]  Niu Huang,et al.  Physics-Based Scoring of Protein-Ligand Complexes: Enrichment of Known Inhibitors in Large-Scale Virtual Screening , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[90]  Kecheng Jie,et al.  Supramolecular Amphiphiles Based on Host-Guest Molecular Recognition Motifs. , 2015, Chemical reviews.

[91]  P. Kollman,et al.  An approach to computing electrostatic charges for molecules , 1984 .

[92]  M. Karplus,et al.  Solution conformations and thermodynamics of structured peptides: molecular dynamics simulation with an implicit solvation model. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[93]  Yoshihisa Inoue,et al.  Solvent and guest isotope effects on complexation thermodynamics of α-, β-, and 6-amino-6-deoxy-β-cyclodextrins , 2002 .

[94]  Alexandre M J J Bonvin,et al.  Are scoring functions in protein-protein docking ready to predict interactomes? Clues from a novel binding affinity benchmark. , 2010, Journal of proteome research.

[95]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  Improving implicit solvent simulations: a Poisson-centric view. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[96]  P. Kollman,et al.  Combined molecular mechanical and continuum solvent approach (MM-PBSA/GBSA) to predict ligand binding , 2000 .

[97]  Erik Lindahl,et al.  A high‐performance parallel‐generalized born implementation enabled by tabulated interaction rescaling , 2010, J. Comput. Chem..

[98]  Ralf Blossey,et al.  Molecular docking as a popular tool in drug design, an in silico travel , 2016, Advances and applications in bioinformatics and chemistry : AABC.