Viscoelastic properties of soft gels: comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and dynamic shear testing in the shear wave regime

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is used to quantify the viscoelastic shear modulus, G*, of human and animal tissues. Previously, values of G* determined by MRE have been compared to values from mechanical tests performed at lower frequencies. In this study, a novel dynamic shear test (DST) was used to measure G* of a tissue-mimicking material at higher frequencies for direct comparison to MRE. A closed-form solution, including inertial effects, was used to extract G* values from DST data obtained between 20 and 200 Hz. MRE was performed using cylindrical ‘phantoms’ of the same material in an overlapping frequency range of 100–400 Hz. Axial vibrations of a central rod caused radially propagating shear waves in the phantom. Displacement fields were fit to a viscoelastic form of Navier's equation using a total least-squares approach to obtain local estimates of G*. DST estimates of the storage G′ (Re[G*]) and loss modulus G″ (Im[G*]) for the tissue-mimicking material increased with frequency from 0.86 to 0.97 kPa (20–200 Hz, n = 16), while MRE estimates of G′ increased from 1.06 to 1.15 kPa (100–400 Hz, n = 6). The loss factor (Im[G*]/Re[G*]) also increased with frequency for both test methods: 0.06–0.14 (20–200 Hz, DST) and 0.11–0.23 (100–400 Hz, MRE). Close agreement between MRE and DST results at overlapping frequencies indicates that G* can be locally estimated with MRE over a wide frequency range. Low signal-to-noise ratio, long shear wavelengths and boundary effects were found to increase residual fitting error, reinforcing the use of an error metric to assess confidence in local parameter estimates obtained by MRE.

[1]  Dieter Klatt,et al.  Wide-range dynamic magnetic resonance elastography. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  P V Bayly,et al.  Frequency-dependent viscoelastic parameters of mouse brain tissue estimated by MR elastography , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Dieter Klatt,et al.  In vivo viscoelastic properties of the brain in normal pressure hydrocephalus , 2010, NMR in biomedicine.

[4]  K D Paulsen,et al.  Effects of frequency- and direction-dependent elastic materials on linearly elastic MRE image reconstructions , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Dieter Klatt,et al.  Viscoelasticity-based MR elastography of skeletal muscle , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  K D Paulsen,et al.  Time-harmonic magnetic resonance elastography of the normal feline brain. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  John B Weaver,et al.  The performance of steady-state harmonic magnetic resonance elastography when applied to viscoelastic materials. , 2010, Medical physics.

[8]  Guy Cloutier,et al.  Shear wave induced resonance elastography of soft heterogeneous media. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Frauke Zipp,et al.  MR-elastography reveals degradation of tissue integrity in multiple sclerosis , 2010, NeuroImage.

[10]  Dieter Klatt,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of liver measured by oscillatory rheometry and multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography. , 2010, Biorheology.

[11]  Rémy Willinger,et al.  Ultrasound-based transient elastography compared to magnetic resonance elastography in soft tissue-mimicking gels , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Dieter Klatt,et al.  The impact of aging and gender on brain viscoelasticity , 2009, NeuroImage.

[13]  T J Hall,et al.  Instrument for determining the complex shear modulus of soft-tissue-like materials from 10 to 300 Hz , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Ralph Sinkus,et al.  In vivo brain viscoelastic properties measured by magnetic resonance elastography , 2008, NMR in biomedicine.

[15]  I. Sack,et al.  Algebraic Helmholtz inversion in planar magnetic resonance elastography , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  P V Bayly,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Measurement of Transient Shear Wave Propagation in a Viscoelastic Gel Cylinder. , 2008, Journal of the mechanics and physics of solids.

[17]  Philip V Bayly,et al.  Measurement of the dynamic shear modulus of mouse brain tissue in vivo by magnetic resonance elastography. , 2008, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[18]  J S H M Wismans,et al.  Characterisation of the mechanical behaviour of brain tissue in compression and shear. , 2008, Biorheology.

[19]  P. Asbach,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of the rheological behavior of human organs using multifrequency MR elastography: a study of brain and liver viscoelasticity , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Rémy Willinger,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography compared with rotational rheometry for in vitro brain tissue viscoelasticity measurement , 2007, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[21]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  MR elastography of breast lesions: Understanding the solid/liquid duality can improve the specificity of contrast‐enhanced MR mammography , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  K. Paulsen,et al.  Performance analysis of steady-state harmonic elastography , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  An analysis of the total least squares problem , 1980, Milestones in Matrix Computation.

[24]  C. Caroli,et al.  Solvent control of crack dynamics in a reversible hydrogel , 2006, Nature materials.

[25]  R. Ehman,et al.  Needle shear wave driver for magnetic resonance elastography , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  K Darvish,et al.  Frequency dependence of complex moduli of brain tissue using a fractional Zener model , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  Armando Manduca,et al.  Quantitative shear wave magnetic resonance elastography: Comparison to a dynamic shear material test , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  Kai-Nan An,et al.  Identification of the testing parameters in high frequency dynamic shear measurement on agarose gels. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  Viscoelastic shear properties of in vivo breast lesions measured by MR elastography. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[30]  K. Paulsen,et al.  Thresholds for detecting and characterizing focal lesions using steady-state MR elastography. , 2003, Medical physics.

[31]  U. Klose,et al.  Comparison of quantitative shear wave MR‐elastography with mechanical compression tests , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  M. Djabourov,et al.  All Gelatin Networks: 2. The Master Curve for Elasticity† , 2002 .

[33]  J. Bishop,et al.  Visualization and quantification of breast cancer biomechanical properties with magnetic resonance elastography. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  K B Arbogast,et al.  Material characterization of the brainstem from oscillatory shear tests. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  K B Arbogast,et al.  A high-frequency shear device for testing soft biological tissues. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  T. Krouskop,et al.  Phantom materials for elastography , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[37]  A. Manduca,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves. , 1995, Science.

[38]  Nicholas W. Tschoegl,et al.  The Phenomenological Theory of Linear Viscoelastic Behavior: An Introduction , 1989 .

[39]  N. Tschoegl The Phenomenological Theory of Linear Viscoelastic Behavior , 1989 .

[40]  R. Koeller Applications of Fractional Calculus to the Theory of Viscoelasticity , 1984 .

[41]  L. Shuck,et al.  Rheological Response of Human Brain Tissue in Shear , 1972 .

[42]  D. J. Finney,et al.  Introduction to Probability and Statistics , 1968 .

[43]  J. E. Carless,et al.  The rigidity of gelatin‐glycerin gels , 1966, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[44]  D. S. Berry Stress propagation in visco-elastic bodies , 1958 .