Response to Visual Threat Following Damage to the Pulvinar

We present a unique case demonstrating contributions of the pulvinar in response to visual threat. Substantial evidence demonstrates that the amygdala contributes to the emotion of fear and the response to threat. Traditionally, two routes to amygdala activation have been distinguished: a "slow cortical" route through visual and association cortex and a "fast subcortical" route through the thalamus. The pulvinar nucleus of the thalamus is well connected to the amygdala, suggesting that pulvinar damage might interfere with amygdala activation and response to threat. We tested this possibility in patient SM, who suffered complete loss of the left pulvinar. We measured interference from threatening images on goal-directed behavior. In SM's ipsilesional field, threatening images slowed responses more than pleasant images did. This interference decreased rapidly over time. In contrast, in SM's contralesional field, interference from threatening images was initially absent and then increased rather than decreased over time. Processing through the pulvinar therefore plays a significant role in generating response to visual threat. We suggest that, with disruption of the subcortical route to the amygdala, briefly presented images were not fully processed for threat. The reemergence of interference over time may reflect contributions of a slower route.

[1]  Karin Mogg,et al.  Covert and overt orienting of attention to emotional faces in anxiety , 2000 .

[2]  M. Fenske,et al.  Modulation of focused attention by faces expressing emotion: evidence from flanker tasks. , 2003, Emotion.

[3]  R. Guillery,et al.  Thalamic Relay Functions and Their Role in Corticocortical Communication Generalizations from the Visual System , 2002, Neuron.

[4]  A. Anderson,et al.  Lesions of the human amygdala impair enhanced perception of emotionally salient events , 2001, Nature.

[5]  P S Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Topographic organization of medial pulvinar connections with the prefrontal cortex in the rhesus monkey , 1997, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  M. Bradley,et al.  Looking at pictures: affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[7]  Joseph E LeDoux Emotion circuits in the brain. , 2009, Annual review of neuroscience.

[8]  R. Rafal,et al.  Contributions of the human pulvinar to linking vision and action , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[9]  Mara Mather,et al.  Aging and Attentional Biases for Emotional Faces , 2003, Psychological science.

[10]  R. Dolan,et al.  Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  R. Rafal,et al.  Deficits in spatial coding and feature binding following damage to spatiotopic maps in the human pulvinar , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  K. Mogg,et al.  ATTENTIONAL BIASES FOR EMOTIONAL FACES , 1997 .