Numerical upscaling in 2‐D heterogeneous poroelastic rocks: Anisotropic attenuation and dispersion of seismic waves

The presence of stiffness contrasts at scales larger than the typical pore sizes but smaller than the predominant seismic wavelengths, can produce seismic attenuation and velocity dispersion in fluid-saturated porous rocks. This energy dissipation mechanism is caused by wave-induced fluid-pressure diffusion among the different components of the probed geological formations. In many cases, heterogeneities have elongated shapes and preferential orientations, which implies that the overall response of the medium is anisotropic. In this work, we propose a numerical upscaling procedure that permits to quantify seismic attenuation and phase velocity considering fluid-pressure diffusion effects as well as generic anisotropy at the sample's scale. The methodology is based on a set of three relaxation tests performed on a 2D synthetic rock sample representative of the medium of interest. It provides a complex-valued frequency-dependent equivalent stiffness matrix through a least-squares procedure. We also derive an approach for computing various poroelastic fields associated with the considered sample in response to the propagation of a seismic wave with arbitrary incidence angle. Using this approach, we provide an energy-based estimation of seismic attenuation. A comprehensive numerical analysis indicates that the methodology is suitable for handling complex media and different levels of overall anisotropy. Comparisons with the energy-based estimations demonstrate that the dynamic-equivalent viscoelastic medium assumption made by the numerical upscaling procedure is reasonable even in presence of high levels of overall anisotropy. This work also highlights the usefulness of poroelastic fields for the physical interpretation of seismic wave phenomena in strongly heterogeneous and complex media.

[1]  M. Biot MECHANICS OF DEFORMATION AND ACOUSTIC PROPAGATION IN POROUS MEDIA , 1962 .

[2]  Sia Nemat-Nasser,et al.  On two micromechanics theories for determining micro–macro relations in heterogeneous solids , 1999 .

[3]  Juan E. Santos,et al.  Equivalent viscoelastic solids for heterogeneous fluid-saturated porous rocks , 2009 .

[4]  K. Holliger,et al.  Representative elementary volumes for evaluating effective seismic properties of heterogeneous poroelastic media , 2016 .

[5]  J. Rathore,et al.  P‐ and S‐wave anisotropy of a synthetic sandstone with controlled crack geometryl1 , 1995 .

[6]  Y. Masson,et al.  On the correlation between material structure and seismic attenuation anisotropy in porous media , 2014 .

[7]  Ilya Tsvankin,et al.  Seismic Signatures and Analysis of Reflection Data in Anisotropic Media , 2001 .

[8]  Leon Thomsen,et al.  Understanding Seismic Anisotropy in Exploration and Exploitation , 2002 .

[9]  Tobias M. Müller,et al.  Anisotropic P-SV-wave dispersion and attenuation due to inter-layer flow in thinly layered porous rocks , 2011 .

[10]  D. Jeulin,et al.  Determination of the size of the representative volume element for random composites: statistical and numerical approach , 2003 .

[11]  M. Ostoja-Starzewski Material spatial randomness: From statistical to representative volume element☆ , 2006 .

[12]  James G. Berryman,et al.  Seismic attenuation due to wave-induced flow , 2004 .

[13]  Yder J. Masson,et al.  Poroelastic finite difference modeling of seismic attenuation and dispersion due to mesoscopic-scale heterogeneity , 2007 .

[14]  M. Lebedev,et al.  Seismic wave attenuation and dispersion resulting from wave-induced flow in porous rocks — A review , 2010 .

[15]  Tobias M. Müller,et al.  Do seismic waves sense fracture connectivity? , 2013 .

[16]  J. Altmann,et al.  Anisotropic dispersion and attenuation due to wave‐induced fluid flow: Quasi‐static finite element modeling in poroelastic solids , 2010 .

[17]  J. Carcione,et al.  Anisotropic poroelasticity and wave‐induced fluid flow: harmonic finite‐element simulations , 2011 .

[18]  K. Holliger,et al.  An energy-based approach to estimate seismic attenuation due to wave-induced fluid flow in heterogeneous poroelastic media , 2016 .

[19]  M. Biot General Theory of Three‐Dimensional Consolidation , 1941 .

[20]  K. Holliger,et al.  Seismic wave attenuation and dispersion due to wave-induced fluid flow in rocks with strong permeability fluctuations. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Mauricio D. Sacchi,et al.  Numerical analysis of wave‐induced fluid flow effects on seismic data: Application to monitoring of CO2 storage at the Sleipner field , 2011 .

[22]  Holger Steeb,et al.  Quasi-static finite element modeling of seismic attenuation and dispersion due to wave-induced fluid flow in poroelastic media , 2011 .

[23]  S. Nakagawa,et al.  Poroelastic modeling of seismic boundary conditions across a fracture. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.