Assessment of mass transfer coefficients in coalescing slug flow in vertical pipes and applications to tubular airlift membrane bioreactors

Abstract One of the operational challenges associated with membrane bioreactors (MBRs) is the fouling of the membranes. In tubular side-stream MBRs, fouling reduction can be achieved through controlling the hydrodynamics of the two-phase slug flow near the membrane surface. The two-phase slug flow induces higher shear stresses near the membrane surface, which generate high mass transfer coefficients from the surface to the bulk region. However, measuring the mass transfer coefficient is difficult in complex heterogeneous mixtures like activated sludge and existing techniques (e.g. electrochemical methods) cannot be applied directly. As an alternative, in this work, a multidisciplinary approach was selected, by exploiting dimensionless analysis using the Sherwood number. Mass transfer coefficients were measured at various superficial velocities of gas and liquid flow in a tubular system. Due to the variability of the mass transfer coefficient obtained for each experimental condition, the results were compiled into, mass transfer coefficient histograms (MTH) for analysis. A bimodal MTH was observed, with one peak corresponding to the mass transfer induced by the liquid flow, and the other peak induced by the gas flow. It was noted that coalescence of bubbles affects the MTH. Coalescence increased the “width” of the peaks (i.e. the estimate of the variability of the mass transfer coefficient) and the height of the peak (i.e. amount of time that a mass transfer coefficient of a given value is maintained). A semi-empirical relationship based on the Leveque relationship for the Sherwood number (mass transfer coefficient) was formulated for the laminar regime. A test case comparison between water and activated sludge was performed based on full-scale airlift MBR operational conditions. It was found that the Sherwood number in the non-Newtonian case is 8% higher than that in the Newtonian case.

[1]  P. Coackley,et al.  Diffusivity, tortuosity and pore structure of activated sludge , 1984 .

[2]  Sheng Chang.  Filtration of biomass with axial inter-fibre upward slug flow: performance and mechanisms , 2000 .

[3]  B. Shannak,et al.  Frictional pressure drop of gas liquid two-phase flow in pipes , 2008 .

[4]  Alexandra M.F.R. Pinto,et al.  Interaction between Taylor bubbles rising in stagnant non-Newtonian fluids , 2007 .

[5]  Donghong Zheng,et al.  Experimental study on hydrodynamic characteristics of upward gas–liquid slug flow , 2006 .

[6]  Raja Ghosh,et al.  Mass transfer in gas-sparged ultrafiltration: upward slug flow in tubular membranes , 1999 .

[7]  F. Aloui,et al.  Electrochemical method for precise determination of wall shear rate , 2008 .

[8]  C. Cabassud,et al.  Fouling control by air sparging inside hollow fibre membranes—effects on energy consumption , 1998 .

[9]  A. Fane,et al.  The use of gas bubbling to enhance membrane processes , 2003 .

[10]  Alexandra M.F.R. Pinto,et al.  Coalescence of two gas slugs rising in a co-current flowing liquid in vertical tubes , 1998 .

[11]  M. Dziubiński,et al.  Comments on bubble rising velocity in non-Newtonian liquids , 2003 .

[12]  Nicolas Rios Ratkovich,et al.  Experimental Study and CFD Modelling of a Two-Phase Slug Flow for an Airlift Tubular Membrane , 2009 .

[13]  A Pollice,et al.  Rheology of Sludge in a Complete Retention Membrane Bioreactor , 2006, Environmental technology.

[14]  Yingxiang Wu,et al.  Studies on two-phase co-current air/non-Newtonian shear-thinning fluid flows in inclined smooth pipes , 2007 .

[15]  J. D. Bugg,et al.  The velocity field around a Taylor bubble rising in a stagnant viscous fluid: numerical and experimental results , 2002 .

[16]  Sirshendu De,et al.  Prediction of mass-transfer coefficient with suction in the applications of reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration , 1997 .

[17]  Jiyong Cai,et al.  Enhanced Mass Transfer and Wall Shear Stress in Multiphase Slug Flow , 2002 .

[18]  Matthias Kraume,et al.  Rheology of Activated Sludge in Membrane Bioreactors , 2002 .

[19]  T. Karayiannis,et al.  The effect of tube diameter on vertical two-phase flow regimes in small tubes , 2006 .

[20]  A. Dukler,et al.  Hydrodynamic model for gas‐liquid slug flow in vertical tubes , 1983 .

[21]  M. Riethmuller,et al.  Flow patterns in the wake of a Taylor bubble rising through vertical columns of stagnant and flowing Newtonian liquids: An experimental study , 2006 .

[22]  Nian-Sheng Cheng,et al.  Formulas for Friction Factor in Transitional Regimes , 2008 .

[23]  L. Shemer,et al.  The relation between the Taylor bubble motion and the velocity field ahead of it , 1999 .

[24]  J. Fabre,et al.  MODELING OF TWO-PHASE SLUG FLOW , 1992 .

[25]  R. Escudié,et al.  Influence of non-uniform distribution of shear stress on aerobic biofilms , 2007 .

[26]  Harry Futselaar,et al.  NORIT AirLift MBR: side-stream system for municipal waste water treatment , 2007 .

[27]  A Pollice,et al.  Membrane bioreactor sludge rheology at different solid retention times. , 2007, Water research.

[28]  A. Dukler,et al.  Rise velocity of a Taylor bubble in a train of such bubbles in a flowing liquid , 1985 .

[29]  R. van Hout,et al.  Translational velocities of elongated bubbles in continuous slug flow , 2002 .

[30]  D. Drew.  Mathematical Modeling of Two-Phase Flow , 1983 .

[31]  Pierre R. Bérubé,et al.  Shear profiles inside gas sparged submerged hollow fiber membrane modules , 2007 .

[32]  D. Che,et al.  Experimental investigation on gas–liquid two-phase slug flow enhanced carbon dioxide corrosion in vertical upward pipeline , 2008 .

[33]  M. Riethmuller,et al.  Flow around individual Taylor bubbles rising in stagnant CMC solutions: PIV measurements , 2005 .

[34]  Donghong Zheng,et al.  An investigation on near wall transport characteristics in an adiabatic upward gas–liquid two-phase slug flow , 2007 .

[35]  I Nopens,et al.  Investigation of the effect of viscosity on slug flow in airlift tubular membranes in search of a sludge surrogate. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[36]  Don W. Green,et al.  Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook , 2007 .

[37]  G. Cognet,et al.  Utilisation des techniques électrochimiques pour la mesure du frottement pariétal dans les écoulements diphasiques , 1978 .

[38]  R. Ranjan,et al.  Mass transfer coefficient with suction for turbulent non-Newtonian flow in application to membrane separations , 2004 .

[39]  A. Pinto,et al.  Flow in the nose region and annular film around a Taylor bubble rising through vertical columns of stagnant and flowing Newtonian liquids , 2006 .

[40]  M Dziubinski,et al.  A general correlation for two-phase pressure drop in intermittent flow of gas and non-Newtonian liquid mixtures in a pipe , 1996 .

[41]  J. M. Rosant.  Liquid-wall shear stress in stratified liquid/gas flow , 1994 .

[42]  T. A. Oliveira,et al.  Pervaporation mass transfer with liquid flow in the transition regime , 2001 .

[43]  John F. Davidson,et al.  The motion of a large gas bubble rising through liquid flowing in a tube , 1978, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[44]  J. Carvalho,et al.  Liquid-side mass transfer coefficient for gas slugs rising in liquids , 1993 .