Impacts of spatial resolution and representation of flow connectivity on large-scale simulation of floods

Abstract. Global-scale river models (GRMs) are core tools for providing consistent estimates of global flood hazard, especially in data-scarce regions. Due to former limitations in computational power and input datasets, most GRMs have been developed to use simplified representations of flow physics and run at coarse spatial resolutions. With increasing computational power and improved datasets, the application of GRMs to finer resolutions is becoming a reality. To support development in this direction, the suitability of GRMs for application to finer resolutions needs to be assessed. This study investigates the impacts of spatial resolution and flow connectivity representation on the predictive capability of a GRM, CaMa-Flood, in simulating the 2011 extreme flood in Thailand. Analyses show that when single downstream connectivity (SDC) is assumed, simulation results deteriorate with finer spatial resolution; Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficients decreased by more than 50 % between simulation results at 10 km resolution and 1 km resolution. When multiple downstream connectivity (MDC) is represented, simulation results slightly improve with finer spatial resolution. The SDC simulations result in excessive backflows on very flat floodplains due to the restrictive flow directions at finer resolutions. MDC channels attenuated these effects by maintaining flow connectivity and flow capacity between floodplains in varying spatial resolutions. While a regional-scale flood was chosen as a test case, these findings should be universal and may have significant impacts on large- to global-scale simulations, especially in regions where mega deltas exist.These results demonstrate that a GRM can be used for higher resolution simulations of large-scale floods, provided that MDC in rivers and floodplains is adequately represented in the model structure.

[1]  A. Ducharne,et al.  The critical role of the routing scheme in simulating peak river discharge in global hydrological models , 2017 .

[2]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Flood inundation modelling: A review of methods, recent advances and uncertainty analysis , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[3]  Q. Shao,et al.  Deriving Flood-Mediated Connectivity between River Channels and Floodplains: Data-Driven Approaches , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[4]  Dai Yamazaki,et al.  The credibility challenge for global fluvial flood risk analysis , 2016, Environmental Research Letters.

[5]  L. Feyen,et al.  Development and evaluation of a framework for global flood hazard mapping , 2016 .

[6]  Y. Hundecha,et al.  Continuous, large‐scale simulation model for flood risk assessments: proof‐of‐concept , 2016 .

[7]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Perspectives on Open Access High Resolution Digital Elevation Models to Produce Global Flood Hazard Layers , 2016, Front. Earth Sci..

[8]  S. Kanae,et al.  Modeling complex flow dynamics of fluvial floods exacerbated by sea level rise in the Ganges–Brahmaputra–Meghna Delta , 2015 .

[9]  P. Bates,et al.  Efficient incorporation of channel cross-section geometry uncertainty into regional and global scale flood inundation models , 2015 .

[10]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  A high‐resolution global flood hazard model† , 2015, Water resources research.

[11]  P. Bates,et al.  Usefulness and limitations of global flood risk models , 2015 .

[12]  Marc F. P. Bierkens,et al.  Global hydrology 2015: State, trends, and directions , 2015 .

[13]  James S. Famiglietti,et al.  Toward hyper‐resolution land‐surface modeling: The effects of fine‐scale topography and soil texture on CLM4.0 simulations over the Southwestern U.S. , 2015 .

[14]  Jin Teng,et al.  Rapid Inundation Modelling in Large Floodplains Using LiDAR DEM , 2015, Water Resources Management.

[15]  Aditya Sood,et al.  Global hydrological models: a review , 2015 .

[16]  Takahiro Sayama,et al.  Hydrologic sensitivity of flood runoff and inundation: 2011 Thailand floods in the Chao Phraya River basin , 2014 .

[17]  Naota Hanasaki,et al.  Assessing the impacts of reservoir operation to floodplain inundation by combining hydrological, reservoir management, and hydrodynamic models , 2014 .

[18]  S. Kanae,et al.  Regional flood dynamics in a bifurcating mega delta simulated in a global river model , 2014 .

[19]  Dai Yamazaki,et al.  Development of the Global Width Database for Large Rivers , 2014 .

[20]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Technology: Fight floods on a global scale , 2014, Nature.

[21]  P. Bates,et al.  Surface water connectivity dynamics of a large scale extreme flood , 2013 .

[22]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Improving computational efficiency in global river models by implementing the local inertial flow equation and a vector‐based river network map , 2013 .

[23]  Brenden Jongman,et al.  Assessing flood risk at the global scale: model setup, results, and sensitivity , 2013 .

[24]  S. Kanae,et al.  Global flood risk under climate change , 2013 .

[25]  Bernhard Lehner,et al.  Global river hydrography and network routing: baseline data and new approaches to study the world's large river systems , 2013 .

[26]  Anusorn Rungsipanich,et al.  Using multi-temporal remote-sensing data to estimate 2011 flood area and volume over Chao Phraya River basin, Thailand , 2013 .

[27]  C. Sampson,et al.  An automated routing methodology to enable direct rainfall in high resolution shallow water models , 2013 .

[28]  R. Paiva,et al.  Validation of a full hydrodynamic model for large‐scale hydrologic modelling in the Amazon , 2013 .

[29]  F. Pappenberger,et al.  Deriving global flood hazard maps of fluvial floods through a physical model cascade , 2012 .

[30]  L. Alfieri,et al.  GloFAS – global ensemble streamflow forecasting and flood early warning , 2012 .

[31]  P. Bates,et al.  A subgrid channel model for simulating river hydraulics and floodplain inundation over large and data sparse areas , 2012 .

[32]  P. Bates.  Integrating remote sensing data with flood inundation models: how far have we got? , 2012 .

[33]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  How much physical complexity is needed to model flood inundation? , 2012 .

[34]  T. Tingsanchali,et al.  Flood risk assessment in the region surrounding the Bangkok Suvarnabhumi Airport , 2012 .

[35]  H. Winsemius,et al.  A framework for global river flood risk assessments , 2012 .

[36]  K. Beven,et al.  Comment on “Hyperresolution global land surface modeling: Meeting a grand challenge for monitoring Earth's terrestrial water” by Eric F. Wood et al. , 2012 .

[37]  P. Bates,et al.  The accuracy of sequential aerial photography and SAR data for observing urban flood dynamics, a case study of the UK summer 2007 floods , 2011 .

[38]  R. Paiva,et al.  Large scale hydrologic and hydrodynamic modeling using limited data and a GIS based approach , 2011 .

[39]  M. Bierkens,et al.  Global monthly water stress: 1. Water balance and water availability , 2011 .

[40]  M. Ek,et al.  Hyperresolution global land surface modeling: Meeting a grand challenge for monitoring Earth's terrestrial water , 2011 .

[41]  S. Kanae,et al.  A physically based description of floodplain inundation dynamics in a global river routing model , 2011 .

[42]  Florian Pappenberger,et al.  A revised land hydrology in the ECMWF model: a step towards daily water flux prediction in a fully‐closed water cycle , 2011 .

[43]  C. Prigent,et al.  Modeling regional to global CH4 emissions of boreal and arctic wetlands , 2010 .

[44]  P. Bates,et al.  A simple inertial formulation of the shallow water equations for efficient two-dimensional flood inundation modelling. , 2010 .

[45]  Yang Hong,et al.  A digitized global flood inventory (1998–2008): compilation and preliminary results , 2010 .

[46]  J. M. Van Der Knijff,et al.  LISFLOOD : a GIS-based distributed model for river basin scale water balance and flood simulation , 2008 .

[47]  Taikan Oki,et al.  Deriving a global river network map and its sub-grid topographic characteristics from a fine-resolution flow direction map , 2009 .

[48]  Taikan Oki,et al.  Global projections of changing risks of floods and droughts in a changing climate , 2008 .

[49]  S. Kanae,et al.  An integrated model for the assessment of global water resources – Part 2: Applications and assessments , 2008 .

[50]  S. Kanae,et al.  An integrated model for the assessment of global water resources – Part 1: Model description and input meteorological forcing , 2008 .

[51]  K. Verdin,et al.  New Global Hydrography Derived From Spaceborne Elevation Data , 2008 .

[52]  Matthew D. Wilson,et al.  Simple spatially-distributed models for predicting flood inundation: A review , 2007 .

[53]  Matthew D. Wilson,et al.  Modeling large‐scale inundation of Amazonian seasonally flooded wetlands , 2007 .

[54]  P. Bates,et al.  Spatial and temporal complexity of the Amazon flood measured from space , 2007 .

[55]  Sujay V. Kumar,et al.  Land information system: An interoperable framework for high resolution land surface modeling , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[56]  J. Kirchner.  Getting the right answers for the right reasons: Linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology , 2006 .

[57]  Albert J. Kettner,et al.  Distributary channels and their impact on sediment dispersal , 2005 .

[58]  K. Beven,et al.  Uncertainty in the calibration of effective roughness parameters in HEC-RAS using inundation and downstream level observations , 2005 .

[59]  P. Döll,et al.  A global hydrological model for deriving water availability indicators: model tuning and validation , 2003 .

[60]  K. Beven.  Towards a coherent philosophy for modelling the environment , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[61]  P. Bates,et al.  Effects of spatial resolution on a raster based model of flood flow , 2001 .

[62]  Thomas A. Hennig,et al.  The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission , 2001, Digital Earth Moving.

[63]  K. Strzepek,et al.  Assessing flood risk at the global scale: model setup, results, and sensitivity , 2013 .

[64]  Taikan Oki,et al.  Characteristics of the 2011 Chao Phraya River flood in Central Thailand , 2012 .

[65]  Giuliano Di Baldassarre,et al.  Is the current flood of data enough? A treatise on research needs for the improvement of flood modelling , 2012 .

[66]  Francesco Dottori,et al.  Developments of a flood inundation model based on the cellular automata approach: Testing different methods to improve model performance , 2011 .

[67]  Taikan Oki,et al.  Toward flood risk prediction: a statistical approach using a 29-year river discharge simulation over Japan , 2008 .

[68]  S. Vongvisessomjai,et al.  Effects on the upstream flood inundation caused from the operation of Chao Phraya Dam , 2007 .

[69]  P. D. Batesa,et al.  A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation , 2000 .

[70]  T. Oki,et al.  Design of Total Runoff Integrating Pathways (TRIP)—A Global River Channel Network , 1998 .

[71]  J. Garrett,et al.  Roughness coefficients for stream channels in Arizona , 1973 .