The Application of New Software Tools to Quantitative Protein Profiling Via Isotope-coded Affinity Tag (ICAT) and Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Lipid rafts were prepared according to standard protocols from Jurkat T cells stimulated via T cell receptor/CD28 cross-linking and from control (unstimulated) cells. Co-isolating proteins from the control and stimulated cell preparations were labeled with isotopically normal (d0) and heavy (d8) versions of the same isotope-coded affinity tag (ICAT) reagent, respectively. Samples were combined, proteolyzed, and resultant peptides fractionated via cation exchange chromatography. Cysteine-containing (ICAT-labeled) peptides were recovered via the biotin tag component of the ICAT reagents by avidin-affinity chromatography. On-line micro-capillary liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry was performed on both avidin-affinity (ICAT-labeled) and flow-through (unlabeled) fractions. Initial peptide sequence identification was by searching recorded tandem mass spectrometry spectra against a human sequence data base using SEQUEST™ software. New statistical data modeling algorithms were then applied to the SEQUEST™ search results. These allowed for discrimination between likely “correct” and “incorrect” peptide assignments, and from these the inferred proteins that they collectively represented, by calculating estimated probabilities that each peptide assignment and subsequent protein identification was a member of the “correct” population. For convenience, the resultant lists of peptide sequences assigned and the proteins to which they corresponded were filtered at an arbitrarily set cut-off of 0.5 (i.e. 50% likely to be “correct”) and above and compiled into two separate datasets. In total, these data sets contained 7667 individual peptide identifications, which represented 2669 unique peptide sequences, corresponding to 685 proteins and related protein groups.

[1]  Deborah A. Brown,et al.  Sorting of GPI-anchored proteins to glycolipid-enriched membrane subdomains during transport to the apical cell surface , 1992, Cell.

[2]  J. Yates,et al.  Identifying the major proteome components of Haemophilus influenzae type‐strain NCTC 8143 , 1997, Electrophoresis.

[3]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Quantitative profiling of differentiation-induced microsomal proteins using isotope-coded affinity tags and mass spectrometry , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  R. Beavis,et al.  A method for assessing the statistical significance of mass spectrometry-based protein identifications using general scoring schemes. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[5]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Approaching complete peroxisome characterization by gas‐phase fractionation , 2002, Electrophoresis.

[6]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Optimization of the isotope-coded affinity tag-labeling procedure for quantitative proteome analysis. , 2001, Analytical biochemistry.

[7]  R. Aebersold,et al.  A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[8]  J. Yates,et al.  Probability-based validation of protein identifications using a modified SEQUEST algorithm. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[9]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  A new algorithm for the evaluation of shotgun peptide sequencing in proteomics: support vector machine classification of peptide MS/MS spectra and SEQUEST scores. , 2003, Journal of proteome research.

[10]  M. Perrot,et al.  Two‐dimensional gel protein database of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1996, Electrophoresis.

[11]  R. Wahl,et al.  Towards defining the urinary proteome using liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry I.Profiling an unfractionated tryptic digest , 2001, Proteomics.

[12]  R. Aebersold,et al.  A comprehensive characterization of the T‐cell antigen receptor complex composition by microcapillary liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry , 2000, Electrophoresis.

[13]  Daniel B. Martin,et al.  Advances in quantitative proteomics using stable isotope tags. , 2002, Trends in biotechnology.

[14]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Identification of gel‐separated proteins by liquid chromatography‐electrospray tandem mass spectrometry: Comparison of methods and their limitations , 1998, Electrophoresis.

[15]  William S Hancock,et al.  Publishing large proteome datasets: scientific policy meets emerging technologies. , 2002, Trends in biotechnology.

[16]  J. Yates,et al.  Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[17]  S. Gygi,et al.  Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  Alexey I Nesvizhskii,et al.  Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[19]  A. Podtelejnikov,et al.  Linking genome and proteome by mass spectrometry: large-scale identification of yeast proteins from two dimensional gels. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  J. Garin,et al.  A survey of the plant mitochondrial proteome in relation to development , 2002, Proteomics.

[21]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Phosphorylation of serine 59 of p56lck in activated T cells. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[22]  L. Samelson,et al.  LAT palmitoylation: its essential role in membrane microdomain targeting and tyrosine phosphorylation during T cell activation. , 1998, Immunity.

[23]  S. Gygi,et al.  Correlation between Protein and mRNA Abundance in Yeast , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[24]  Bruce Futcher,et al.  Proteome studies of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Identification and characterization of abundant proteins , 1997, Electrophoresis.

[25]  S. Gygi,et al.  Evaluation of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis-based proteome analysis technology. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  L. Spremulli,et al.  The Large Subunit of the Mammalian Mitochondrial Ribosome , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  Quantitative Protein Profiling Using Two-dimensional Gel Electrophoresis, Isotope-coded Affinity Tag Labeling, and Mass Spectrometry* , 2002, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[28]  R. Aebersold,et al.  CD28 stimulation regulates its association with N‐ethylmaleimide‐sensitive fusion protein and other proteins involved in vesicle sorting , 2001, Proteomics.

[29]  R. Aebersold,et al.  The Application of New Software Tools to Quantitative Protein Profiling Via Isotope-coded Affinity Tag (ICAT) and Tandem Mass Spectrometry , 2003, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[30]  J. Yates,et al.  An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database , 1994, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.