Cross-Validation of Observations between the GPM Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar and Ground Based Dual-Polarization Radars

The Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission Core Observatory is equipped with a dual-frequency precipitation radar (DPR) with capability of measuring precipitation simultaneously at frequencies of 13.6 GHz (Ku-band) and 35.5 GHz (Ka-band). Since the GPM-DPR cannot use information from polarization diversity, radar reflectivity factor is the most important parameter used in all retrievals. In this study, GPM’s observations of reflectivity at dual-frequency and instantaneous rainfall products are compared quantitatively against dual-polarization ground-based NEXRAD radars from the GPM Validation Network (VN). The ground radars, chosen for this study, are located in the southeastern plains of the U.S.A. with altitudes varying from 5 to 210 m. It is a challenging task to quantitatively compare measurements from space-based and ground-based platforms due to their difference in resolution volumes and viewing geometry. To perform comparisons on a point-to-point basis, radar observations need to be volume matched by averaging data in common volume or by re-sampling data to a common grid system. In this study, a 3-D volume matching technique first proposed by Bolen and Chandrasekar (2003) and later modified by Schwaller and Morris (2011) is applied to both radar data. DPR and ground radar observations and products are cross validated against each other with a large data set. Over 250 GPM overpass cases at 5 NEXRAD locations, starting from April 2014 to June 2018, have been considered. Analysis shows that DPR Kuand Ka-Band reflectivities are well matched with ground radar with correlation coefficient as high as 0.9 for Ku-band and 0.85 for Ka-band. Ground radar calibration is also checked by observing variation in mean biases of reflectivity between DPR and GR over time. DPR rainfall products are also evaluated. Though DPR underestimates higher rainfall rates in convective cases, its overall performance is found to be satisfactory.

[1]  P. Waterman,et al.  SYMMETRY, UNITARITY, AND GEOMETRY IN ELECTROMAGNETIC SCATTERING. , 1971 .

[2]  Luca Baldini,et al.  Use of the GPM Constellation for Monitoring Heavy Precipitation Events Over the Mediterranean Region , 2016, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[3]  Hatim O. Sharif,et al.  How Well Can Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Capture Hurricanes? Case Study: Hurricane Harvey , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[4]  V. Bringi,et al.  Drop Shapes, Model Comparisons, and Calculations of Polarimetric Radar Parameters in Rain , 2007 .

[5]  Peter J. Speirs,et al.  A Comparison between the GPM Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar and Ground-Based Radar Precipitation Rate Estimates in the Swiss Alps and Plateau , 2017 .

[6]  Riko Oki,et al.  Current status of the dual-frequency precipitation radar on the global precipitation measurement core spacecraft , 2015, SPIE Remote Sensing.

[7]  S. Barnes,et al.  A Technique for Maximizing Details in Numerical Weather Map Analysis , 1964 .

[8]  V. Chandrasekar,et al.  Cross validation of observations from GPM dual-frequnecy precipitation radar with S-band ground radar measurents over the Dallas — Fort worth region , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS).

[9]  David A. Newell,et al.  The Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Microwave Imager (GMI): Instrument Overview and Early On-Orbit Performance , 2015, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Jeffrey A. Jones,et al.  Use of the Surface Reference Technique for Path Attenuation Estimates from the TRMM Precipitation Radar , 2000 .

[11]  Robert Meneghini,et al.  A Study on the Feasibility of Dual-Wavelength Radar for Identification of Hydrometeor Phases , 2011 .

[12]  Riko Oki,et al.  Evaluation of Precipitation Estimates by at-Launch Codes of GPM/DPR Algorithms Using Synthetic Data from TRMM/PR Observations , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[13]  Dawei Han,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the TRMM Precipitation Estimation Using Ground-Based Radars from the GPM Validation Network , 2012 .

[14]  V. Chandrasekar,et al.  Microwave radar signatures of precipitation from S band to Ka band: application to GPM mission , 2012 .

[15]  Mathew R. Schwaller,et al.  A Ground Validation Network for the Global Precipitation Measurement Mission , 2011 .

[16]  V. Chandrasekar,et al.  Quantitative Cross Validation of Space-Based and Ground-Based Radar Observations , 2000 .

[17]  David A. Imy,et al.  A Description of the Initial Set of Analysis Products Available from the NEXRAD WSR-88D System , 1993 .

[18]  Hatim O. Sharif,et al.  Evaluation of the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Satellite Rainfall Products over the Lower Colorado River Basin, Texas , 2018 .

[19]  Marco Gabella,et al.  Measurement of Precipitation in the Alps Using Dual-Polarization C-Band Ground-Based Radars, the GPM Spaceborne Ku-Band Radar, and Rain Gauges , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[20]  M. Heistermann,et al.  Enhancing the consistency of spaceborne and ground-based radar comparisons by using beam blockage fraction as a quality filter , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[21]  Nobuhiro Takahashi,et al.  Development of the spaceborne Dual-frequency Precipitation Radar for the Global Precipitation Measurement mission , 2004, IGARSS 2004. 2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[22]  Toshio Iguchi,et al.  Intercomparison of Attenuation Correction Methods for the GPM Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar , 2015 .

[23]  Emmanouil N. Anagnostou,et al.  The Use of TRMM Precipitation Radar Observations in Determining Ground Radar Calibration Biases , 2001 .

[24]  Robert A. Black,et al.  The Concept of “Normalized” Distribution to Describe Raindrop Spectra: A Tool for Cloud Physics and Cloud Remote Sensing , 2001 .

[25]  V. Chandrasekar,et al.  The quantitative precipitation estimation system for Dallas–Fort Worth (DFW) urban remote sensing network , 2015 .

[26]  Chris Kidd,et al.  Global Precipitation Estimates from Cross-Track Passive Microwave Observations Using a Physically Based Retrieval Scheme , 2016 .

[27]  Giulia Panegrossi,et al.  Passive Microwave Rainfall Error Analysis Using High-Resolution X-Band Dual-Polarization Radar Observations in Complex Terrain , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[28]  Toshio Iguchi,et al.  GPM/DPR Level-2 Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document , 2010 .

[29]  Toshio Iguchi,et al.  Comparisons of Rain Rate and Reflectivity Factor Derived from the TRMM Precipitation Radar and the WSR-88D over the Melbourne, Florida, Site , 2001 .

[30]  V. Chandrasekar,et al.  Precipitation Type Classification Method for Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) Onboard the GPM , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[31]  V. Chandrasekar,et al.  An Algorithm to Identify Surface Snowfall From GPM DPR Observations , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[32]  Toshio Iguchi,et al.  An overview of the precipitation retrieval algorithm for the dual-frequency precipitation radar (DPR) on the global precipitation measurement (GPM) mission's core satellite , 2012, Asia-Pacific Environmental Remote Sensing.

[33]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Weather Radar Coverage over the Contiguous United States , 2002 .

[34]  K. Okamoto,et al.  Rain profiling algorithm for the TRMM precipitation radar , 1997, IGARSS'97. 1997 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium Proceedings. Remote Sensing - A Scientific Vision for Sustainable Development.

[35]  C. Kummerow,et al.  The Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Sensor Package , 1998 .

[36]  Fumie A. Furuzawa,et al.  Early Evaluation of Ku- and Ka-Band Sensitivities for the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) , 2015 .

[37]  V. Chandrasekar,et al.  Evaluation and Validation of GPM Dual-Frequency Classification Module after Launch , 2016 .

[38]  Eugenio Gorgucci,et al.  POTENTIAL ROLE OF DUAL- POLARIZATION RADAR IN THE VALIDATION OF SATELLITE PRECIPITATION MEASUREMENTS Rationale and Opportunities , 2008 .

[39]  V. Chandrasekar,et al.  Identification of snow from GPM-DPR observations and cross validation with S-band ground radar dual polarization measurements , 2017, 2017 XXXIInd General Assembly and Scientific Symposium of the International Union of Radio Science (URSI GASS).

[40]  V. Chandrasekar,et al.  Simulation of Spaceborne Radar Observations of Precipitation: Application to GPM-DPR , 2008, IGARSS 2008 - 2008 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[41]  C. Konrad,et al.  Relationships between tropical cyclones and heavy rainfall in the Carolina region of the USA , 2010 .

[42]  V. Chandrasekar,et al.  Raindrop Size Distribution Retrieval From Dual-Frequency and Dual-Polarization Radar , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[43]  Alexander V. Ryzhkov,et al.  Calibration Issues of Dual-Polarization Radar Measurements , 2005 .

[44]  H. Ramsay,et al.  Calibrating Ground-Based Radars against TRMM and GPM , 2017 .

[45]  Steven Kempler,et al.  Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Precipitation Data and Services for Research and Applications , 2012 .

[46]  V. Chandrasekar,et al.  Methodology for Aligning and Comparing Spaceborne Radar and Ground-Based Radar Observations , 2003 .

[47]  Emmanouil N. Anagnostou,et al.  Satellite Rainfall Error Analysis with the Use of High-Resolution X-Band Dual-Polarization Radar Observations Over the Italian Alps , 2017 .

[48]  A. Hou,et al.  The Global Precipitation Measurement Mission , 2014 .