Active transport between home and school assessed with GPS: a cross-sectional study among Dutch elementary school children

BackgroundActive transport to school is associated with higher levels of physical activity in children. Promotion of active transport has therefore gained attention as a potential target to increase children’s physical activity levels. Recent studies have recognized that the distance between home and school is an important predictor for active travel among children. These studies did not yet use the promising global positioning system (GPS) methods to objectively assess active transport. This study aims to explore active transport to school in relation to the distance between home and school among a sample of Dutch elementary school children, using GPS.MethodsSeventy-nine children, aged 6-11 years, were recruited in six schools that were located in five cities in the Netherlands. All children were asked to wear a GPS receiver for one week. All measurements were conducted between December 2008 and April 2009. Based on GPS recordings, the distance of the trips between home and school were calculated. In addition, the mode of transport (i.e., walking, cycling, motorized transport) was determined using the average and maximum speed of the GPS tracks. Then, proportion of walking and cycling trips to school was determined in relation to the distance between home and school.ResultsOut of all school trips that were recorded (n = 812), 79.2% were classified as active transport. On average, active commuting trips were of a distance of 422 meters with an average speed of 5.2 km/hour. The proportion of walking trips declined significantly at increased school trip distance, whereas the proportion of cycling trips (β = 1.23, p < 0.01) and motorized transport (β = 3.61, p < 0.01) increased. Almost all GPS tracks less than 300 meters were actively commuted, while of the tracks above 900 meters, more than half was passively commuted.ConclusionsIn the current research setting, active transport between home and school was the most frequently used mode of travel. Increasing distance seems to be associated with higher levels of passive transport. These results are relevant for those involved in decisions on where to site schools and residences, as it may affect healthy behavior among children.

[1]  I. Janssen,et al.  Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth , 2010, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[2]  Tracy McMillan,et al.  The relative influence of urban form on a child’s travel mode to school , 2007 .

[3]  S. Vries,et al.  Using GPS to Measure the Interaction Between Individuals and Their Neighbourhood , 2013 .

[4]  B. Giles-Corti,et al.  Personal, family, social, and environmental correlates of active commuting to school. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.

[5]  Jacqueline Kerr,et al.  Using accelerometers and global positioning system devices to assess gender and age differences in children’s school, transport, leisure and home based physical activity , 2014, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[6]  C. Lawson,et al.  Children’s Active Commuting to School: Current Knowledge and Future Directions , 2008, Preventing chronic disease.

[7]  Jing Nie,et al.  Positional Accuracy of Geocoded Addresses in Epidemiologic Research , 2003, Epidemiology.

[8]  K. Pont,et al.  Environmental correlates of children's active transportation: a systematic literature review. , 2009, Health & place.

[9]  U. Ekelund,et al.  What proportion of youth are physically active? Measurement issues, levels and recent time trends , 2011, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[10]  Willem van Mechelen,et al.  Built Environmental Correlates of Walking and Cycling in Dutch Urban Children: Results from the SPACE Study , 2010, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[11]  R. Buliung,et al.  GIS measured environmental correlates of active school transport: A systematic review of 14 studies , 2011, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[12]  Francisca Galindo Garre,et al.  Evaluation of neural networks to identify types of activity using accelerometers. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[13]  D. Ward,et al.  Barriers to and Facilitators of Walking and Bicycling to School: Formative Results From the Non-Motorized Travel Study , 2008, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[14]  W. van Mechelen,et al.  Meeting the 60-min physical activity guideline: effect of operationalization. , 2009, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[15]  Noreen C McDonald,et al.  Active transportation to school: trends among U.S. schoolchildren, 1969-2001. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[16]  M. Duncan,et al.  GIS or GPS? A comparison of two methods for assessing route taken during active transport. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[17]  T. Cole,et al.  Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  Stewart Trost,et al.  Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth. , 2005, The Journal of pediatrics.

[19]  H. P. van der Ploeg,et al.  Trends in Australian children traveling to school 1971-2003: burning petrol or carbohydrates? , 2008, Preventive medicine.

[20]  Matthew J. Roorda,et al.  Built Environment and School Travel Mode Choice in Toronto, Canada , 2010 .

[21]  Scott C. Wearing,et al.  Child transport practices and perceived barriers in active commuting to school , 2008 .

[22]  Kees Maat,et al.  Deriving and validating trip purposes and travel modes for multi-day GPS-based travel surveys: A large-scale application in the Netherlands , 2009 .

[23]  L. Steg,et al.  Promoting physical activity and reducing climate change: opportunities to replace short car trips with active transportation. , 2009, Preventive medicine.

[24]  Jenny Ziviani,et al.  Walking to school: incidental physical activity in the daily occupations of Australian children. , 2004, Occupational therapy international.

[25]  Marc Schlossberg,et al.  School Trips: Effects of Urban Form and Distance on Travel Mode , 2006 .

[26]  Noreen C. McDonald,et al.  Children’s mode choice for the school trip: the role of distance and school location in walking to school , 2007 .

[27]  Scott Duncan,et al.  Using global positioning systems in health research: a practical approach to data collection and processing. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[28]  Angie S Page,et al.  Contribution of the school journey to daily physical activity in children aged 11-12 years. , 2012, American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

[29]  A. D. Diez Roux,et al.  Variability and seasonality of active transportation in USA: evidence from the 2001 NHTS , 2011, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[30]  P. Jacobsen.  Safety in numbers: more walkers and bicyclists, safer walking and bicycling , 2003, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[31]  C. Braun-Fahrländer,et al.  Trend in active transportation to school among Swiss school children and its associated factors: three cross-sectional surveys 1994, 2000 and 2005 , 2010, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[32]  W. van Mechelen,et al.  Determinants of Activity-Friendly Neighborhoods for Children: Results from the Space Study , 2007, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[33]  S. Griffin,et al.  Environmental supportiveness for physical activity in English schoolchildren: a study using Global Positioning Systems , 2009, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[34]  Alec Holt,et al.  Using accelerometers and GPS units to identify the proportion of daily physical activity located in parks with playgrounds in New Zealand children. , 2010, Preventive medicine.

[35]  S. Griffin,et al.  Attitudes, social support and environmental perceptions as predictors of active commuting behaviour in school children , 2009, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[36]  Paul Kelly,et al.  The relationship between active travel to school and health-related fitness in children and adolescents: a systematic review , 2011, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[37]  L. Frank,et al.  Multiple Impacts of the Built Environment on Public Health: Walkable Places and the Exposure to Air Pollution , 2005 .

[38]  Laura Davis,et al.  Mapping the walk to school using accelerometry combined with a global positioning system. , 2010, American journal of preventive medicine.

[39]  W.T.M. Ooijendijk,et al.  Consensus over de Nederlandse norm voor gezond bewegen , 2000 .

[40]  Ralph Buehler,et al.  Making Cycling Irresistible: Lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany , 2008 .

[41]  A. Ellaway,et al.  Neighbourhood Structure and Health Promotion: An Introduction , 2013 .

[42]  R. Buliung,et al.  Active school transport, physical activity levels and body weight of children and youth: a systematic review. , 2009, Preventive medicine.

[43]  S. Griffin,et al.  The contribution of active travel to children's physical activity levels: cross-sectional results from the ALSPAC study. , 2009, Preventive medicine.