Impact of Reconstruction Algorithms on CT Radiomic Features of Pulmonary Tumors: Analysis of Intra- and Inter-Reader Variability and Inter-Reconstruction Algorithm Variability

Purpose To identify the impact of reconstruction algorithms on CT radiomic features of pulmonary tumors and to reveal and compare the intra- and inter-reader and inter-reconstruction algorithm variability of each feature. Methods Forty-two patients (M:F = 19:23; mean age, 60.43±10.56 years) with 42 pulmonary tumors (22.56±8.51mm) underwent contrast-enhanced CT scans, which were reconstructed with filtered back projection and commercial iterative reconstruction algorithm (level 3 and 5). Two readers independently segmented the whole tumor volume. Fifteen radiomic features were extracted and compared among reconstruction algorithms. Intra- and inter-reader variability and inter-reconstruction algorithm variability were calculated using coefficients of variation (CVs) and then compared. Results Among the 15 features, 5 first-order tumor intensity features and 4 gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM)-based features showed significant differences (p<0.05) among reconstruction algorithms. As for the variability, effective diameter, sphericity, entropy, and GLCM entropy were the most robust features (CV≤5%). Inter-reader variability was larger than intra-reader or inter-reconstruction algorithm variability in 9 features. However, for entropy, homogeneity, and 4 GLCM-based features, inter-reconstruction algorithm variability was significantly greater than inter-reader variability (p<0.013). Conclusions Most of the radiomic features were significantly affected by the reconstruction algorithms. Inter-reconstruction algorithm variability was greater than inter-reader variability for entropy, homogeneity, and GLCM-based features.

[1]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Quantitative Features of Liver Lesions, Lung Nodules, and Renal Stones at Multi-Detector Row CT Examinations: Dependency on Radiation Dose and Reconstruction Algorithm. , 2016, Radiology.

[2]  D. Townsend,et al.  Impact of Image Reconstruction Settings on Texture Features in 18F-FDG PET , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  Jinzhong Yang,et al.  Measuring Computed Tomography Scanner Variability of Radiomics Features , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[4]  Sang Min Lee,et al.  Prognostic Value of Computed Tomography Texture Features in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancers Treated With Definitive Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[5]  Jin Mo Goo,et al.  Quantitative Computed Tomography Imaging Biomarkers in the Diagnosis and Management of Lung Cancer , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[6]  M. McNitt-Gray,et al.  Variability in CT lung-nodule volumetry: Effects of dose reduction and reconstruction methods. , 2015, Medical physics.

[7]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction (SAFIRE) versus weighted filtered back projection (WFBP) effects on quantitative measure in the COPDGene 2 test object. , 2014, Medical physics.

[8]  P. Lambin,et al.  Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach , 2014, Nature Communications.

[9]  Jin Mo Goo,et al.  Computerized texture analysis of persistent part-solid ground-glass nodules: differentiation of preinvasive lesions from invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas. , 2014, Radiology.

[10]  Jin Mo Goo,et al.  Volume and mass doubling times of persistent pulmonary subsolid nodules detected in patients without known malignancy. , 2014, Radiology.

[11]  A. Ward,et al.  New techniques for assessing response after hypofractionated radiotherapy for lung cancer. , 2014, Journal of thoracic disease.

[12]  W. Tsai,et al.  Exploring Variability in CT Characterization of Tumors: A Preliminary Phantom Study. , 2014, Translational oncology.

[13]  Samuel H. Hawkins,et al.  Reproducibility and Prognosis of Quantitative Features Extracted from CT Images. , 2014, Translational oncology.

[14]  Sang Min Lee,et al.  Correlation between the Size of the Solid Component on Thin-Section CT and the Invasive Component on Pathology in Small Lung Adenocarcinomas Manifesting as Ground-Glass Nodules , 2014, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[15]  H. Hricak,et al.  Intra- and interobserver variability in CT measurements in oncology. , 2013, Radiology.

[16]  H. Kauczor,et al.  CT volumetry of artificial pulmonary nodules using an ex vivo lung phantom: influence of exposure parameters and iterative reconstruction on reproducibility. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[17]  Roberto Maroldi,et al.  Texture analysis of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) on contrast-enhanced computed tomography: prediction of the response to the first-line chemotherapy , 2013, European Radiology.

[18]  Simon Wan,et al.  Tumor Heterogeneity and Permeability as Measured on the CT Component of PET/CT Predict Survival in Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[19]  T. Leiner,et al.  The Effects of Computed Tomography with Iterative Reconstruction on Solid Pulmonary Nodule Volume Quantification , 2013, PloS one.

[20]  Arnold M. R. Schilham,et al.  Iterative reconstruction techniques for computed tomography Part 1: Technical principles , 2013, European Radiology.

[21]  Joel G Fletcher,et al.  Validation of Dual-Source Single-Tube Reconstruction as a Method to Obtain Half-Dose Images to Evaluate Radiation Dose and Noise Reduction: Phantom and Human Assessment Using CT Colonography and Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction (SAFIRE) , 2012, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[22]  K. Miles,et al.  Tumour heterogeneity in non-small cell lung carcinoma assessed by CT texture analysis: a potential marker of survival , 2012, European Radiology.

[23]  W. Kalender,et al.  Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. , 2010, Radiology.

[24]  L. Washington,et al.  Inherent variability of CT lung nodule measurements in vivo using semiautomated volumetric measurements. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.