Strategic communication between prospect theoretic agents over a Gaussian test channel

In this paper, we model a Stackelberg game in a simple Gaussian test channel where a human transmitter (leader) communicates a source message to a human receiver (follower). We model human decision making using prospect theory models proposed for continuous decision spaces. Assuming that the value function is the squared distortion at both the transmitter and the receiver, we analyze the effects of the weight functions at both the transmitter and the receiver on optimal communication strategies, namely encoding at the transmitter and decoding at the receiver, in the Stackelberg sense. We show that the optimal strategies for the behavioral agents in the Stackelberg sense are identical to those designed for unbiased agents. At the same time, we also show that the prospect-theoretic distortions at both the transmitter and the receiver are both larger than the expected distortion, thus making behavioral agents less contended than unbiased agents. Consequently, the presence of cognitive biases increases the need for transmission power in order to achieve a given distortion at both transmitter and receiver.

[1]  Tamer Başar,et al.  Information-Theoretic Approach to Strategic Communication as a Hierarchical Game , 2015, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[2]  J. Morgan,et al.  Cheap Talk , 2005 .

[3]  D. Prelec The Probability Weighting Function , 1998 .

[4]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Towards the design of prospect-theory based human decision rules for hypothesis testing , 2016, 2016 54th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[5]  Kenneth E. Train,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[6]  Sinan Gezici,et al.  Quadratic Multi-Dimensional Signaling Games and Affine Equilibria , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[7]  J. Sobel,et al.  STRATEGIC INFORMATION TRANSMISSION , 1982 .

[8]  Florian Heiss,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[9]  T. Başar An equilibrium theory for multiperson decision making with multiple probabilistic models , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[10]  Richard Gonzalez,et al.  On the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[12]  Eva Drobná,et al.  Testing Prospect Theory Parameters , 2013 .

[13]  Man Hon Cheung,et al.  Spectrum Investment Under Uncertainty: A Behavioral Economics Perspective , 2016, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[14]  E. Rowland Theory of Games and Economic Behavior , 1946, Nature.

[15]  Narayan B. Mandayam,et al.  When Users Interfere with Protocols: Prospect Theory in Wireless Networks using Random Access and Data Pricing as an Example , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[16]  Walid Saad,et al.  Prospect theory for enhanced cyber-physical security of drone delivery systems: A network interdiction game , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[17]  A. Rubinstein Modeling Bounded Rationality , 1998 .

[18]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[19]  Emir Kamenica,et al.  Bayesian Persuasion , 2009 .

[20]  Uday S. Karmarkar,et al.  Subjectively weighted utility: A descriptive extension of the expected utility model , 1978 .

[21]  M. Spence Job Market Signaling , 1973 .

[22]  M. Rieger,et al.  Prospect theory for continuous distributions , 2008 .

[23]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Digital Communications , 1983 .

[24]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[25]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[26]  Walid Saad,et al.  Prospect theory for enhanced smart grid resilience using distributed energy storage , 2016, 2016 54th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).