Trends in hip and knee joint replacement: socioeconomic inequalities and projections of need

Objectives: To examine trends in primary and revision joint (hip and knee) replacement in England between 1991 and 2000. Methods: Analysis of hospital episodes statistics between 1 April 1991 and 30 March 2001 for total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR). Descriptive statistics and regression modelling were used to summarise patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics and to explore variations in joint surgery rates by age, sex, and deprivation. Results: Between 1991 and 2000, the incidence of primary THR increased by 18%, while the incidence of revision THR more than doubled. The incidence of primary TKR doubled, with revision TKR increasing by 300%. Over the 10 year period, the proportion of THR episodes that involved revision operations rose from 8% to 20%. Substantial variations in operation rates by socioeconomic status were seen, with the most deprived fifth of the population experiencing significantly lower rates. Projections estimate that primary THR numbers could rise by up to 22% by the year 2010, with primary TKR numbers rising by up to 63%. Conclusions: Provision of joint replacement surgery in English NHS hospitals has increased substantially over the past decade. Revision operations in particular have increased markedly. The growth in primary operations has mostly occurred among those aged 60 years and over; rates among young people have changed very little. There is a significant deprivation based gradient in rates. If current trends continue there would be almost 47 000 primary hip and 54 000 primary knee operations annually by 2010.

[1]  Elena Losina,et al.  Rates and Outcomes of Primary and Revision Total Hip Replacement in the United States Medicare Population , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  S. Ling,et al.  Knee osteoarthritis compromises early mobility function: The Women's Health and Aging Study II. , 2003, The Journal of rheumatology.

[3]  A. McMurray,et al.  Health-related quality of life and health service use following total hip replacement surgery. , 2002, Journal of advanced nursing.

[4]  James G Wright,et al.  The effect of education and income on need and willingness to undergo total joint arthroplasty. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[5]  D. Feeny,et al.  Health-related quality of life and mobility of patients awaiting elective total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study. , 2002, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[6]  A. Nilsdotter,et al.  Age and waiting time as predictors of outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis. , 2002, Rheumatology.

[7]  P. Brooks.  Impact of osteoarthritis on individuals and society: how much disability? Social consequences and health economic implications. , 2002, Current opinion in rheumatology.

[8]  I. Pinder,et al.  Measured ambulation and self-reported health status following total joint replacement for the osteoarthritic knee. , 2002, Rheumatology.

[9]  K. McCaul,et al.  Changing incidence of primary total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[10]  J. Reginster,et al.  The prevalence and burden of arthritis. , 2002, Rheumatology.

[11]  S. Hajat,et al.  Does waiting for total hip replacement matter? Prospective cohort study , 2002, Journal of health services research & policy.

[12]  D. Voaklander,et al.  Change in pain and function while waiting for major joint arthroplasty. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[13]  K Knutson,et al.  The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 1975-1997: An update with special emphasis on 41,223 knees operated on in 1988-1997 , 2001, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[14]  P. Paavolainen,et al.  The Finnish Arthroplasty Register: Report of the hip register , 2001, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[15]  L. Rushton,et al.  Private funding of elective hospital treatment in England and Wales, 1997-8: national survey , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  L. Lidgren,et al.  Past incidence and future demand for knee arthroplasty in Sweden: A report from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register regarding the effect of past and future population changes on the number of arthroplasties performed , 2000, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[17]  B. Espehaug,et al.  The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties , 2000, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[18]  P Herberts,et al.  Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: A review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases , 2000, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[19]  S. Macintyre.  Reducing health inequalities: An action report , 1999 .

[20]  O Johnell,et al.  Projecting the need for hip replacement over the next three decades: influence of changing demography and threshold for surgery , 1999, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[21]  R. Chang,et al.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip. , 1997, JAMA.

[22]  N. Chaturvedi,et al.  From the surgery to the surgeon: does deprivation influence consultation and operation rates? , 1995, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[23]  D. Black.  HEALTH AND DEPRIVATION: Inequality and the north , 1988 .

[24]  P. Townsend,et al.  Health and Deprivation: Inequality and the North , 1987 .