Assessment of Three Satellite-Estimated Land Surface Downwelling Shortwave Irradiance Data Sets

This letter assesses three satellite-estimated surface downwelling shortwave irradiance data sets: 1) GEWEX-SRB; 2) ISCCP-FD; and 3) CERES-FSW, using ground measurements collected at 36 globally distributed sites from 2000-2002. SRB and FD solar irradiance are available at three hourly intervals during daytime and FSW hourly solar irradiance is available at late morning. The data are compared to ground measurements at the temporal resolutions of the satellite measurements. Results indicate that the downwelling solar irradiances of the three products show good overall agreement with ground measurements. FSW has an overall coefficient of determination of R2 = 0.69, a bias of 29.7 Wm-2 (6.0% in relative value), and a standard deviation (STD) of 123.2 Wm-2 (25.1% in relative value). The values are 0.83, -5.5 Wm-2 (-1.9%), 101.3 Wm-2 (35.0%) for SRB, and 0.83, 2.8 Wm-2 (0.3%), 101.7 W m 2 (35.0%) for FD. However, there are substantial uncertainties in these products in some regions. For example, large biases ranging from -90.2 Wm-2 to 45.8 Wm-2 are found in SRB in Southeast Asia. FD has large biases in Southeast Asia (58.9 Wm-2) and Greenland (-33.2 Wm-2). FSW has substantial biases in Southeast Asia (72.6 Wm-2) and Japan (66.5 Wm-2); while R2 is 0.35 in Tibetan Plateau and 0.47 in Southeast Asia.

[1]  Andrew A. Lacis,et al.  Calculation of surface and top of atmosphere radiative fluxes from physical quantities based on ISCCP data sets: 1. Method and sensitivity to input data uncertainties , 1995 .

[2]  Oleg Dubovik,et al.  Validation of AERONET estimates of atmospheric solar fluxes and aerosol radiative forcing by ground‐based broadband measurements , 2008 .

[3]  C. H. Whitlock,et al.  Assessment of the global monthly mean surface insolation estimated from satellite measurements using global energy balance archive data , 1995 .

[4]  Yaoming Ma,et al.  Evaluation of satellite estimates of downward shortwave radiation over the Tibetan Plateau , 2008 .

[5]  Stefan Kinne,et al.  An assessment of radiation budget data provided by the ISCCP and GEWEX‐SRB , 2006 .

[6]  J. T. Suttles,et al.  Surface radiation budget for climate applications , 1986 .

[7]  Paul W. Stackhouse,et al.  Using ARM Data to Evaluate Satellite Surface Solar Flux Retrievals , 2005 .

[8]  Ch. Marty,et al.  Altitude dependence of surface radiation fluxes and cloud forcing in the alps: results from the alpine surface radiation budget network , 2002 .

[9]  Judith A. Curry,et al.  Comparison of surface radiative flux data sets over the Arctic Ocean , 2005 .

[10]  Q. Fu,et al.  Parameterization of the Radiative Properties of Cirrus Clouds , 1993 .

[11]  A. Lacis,et al.  Calculation of radiative fluxes from the surface to top of atmosphere based on ISCCP and other global data sets: Refinements of the radiative transfer model and the input data , 2004 .

[12]  R. Pinker,et al.  Modeling Surface Solar Irradiance for Satellite Applications on a Global Scale , 1992 .

[13]  Konrad Steffen,et al.  Surface climatology of the Greenland Ice Sheet: Greenland Climate Network 1995–1999 , 2001 .

[14]  Paul W. Stackhouse,et al.  An assessment of satellite surface radiation products for highlands with Tibet instrumental data , 2006 .

[15]  C. Long,et al.  SURFRAD—A National Surface Radiation Budget Network for Atmospheric Research , 2000 .

[16]  Stephen J. Cox,et al.  The NASA/GEWEX Surface Radiation Budget project: overview and analysis , 2006 .

[17]  Alexander P. Trishchenko,et al.  Natural variability and sampling errors in solar radiation measurements for model validation over the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Southern Great Plains region , 2005 .

[18]  Xiangao Xia,et al.  Analysis of downwelling surface solar radiation in China from National Centers for Environmental Prediction reanalysis, satellite estimates, and surface observations , 2006 .