Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Percutaneous Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation for Lumbosacral Spine Degenerative Diseases. A Retrospective Database of 40 Consecutive Cases and Literature Review.

AIM To report our results about minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) with bilateral pedicle screw fixation, in patients with degenerative lumbosacral spine disease. To describe the indications, surgical technique and results of a consecutive series of 40 patients who had undergone MI-TLIF. Despite the limited number of clinical studies, published data suggest tremendous potential advantages of this technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS Forty patients with radiological findings of degenerative lumbosacral spine disease had undergone MI-TLIF between July 2012 and January 2015. Clinical outcomes were assessed by means of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Health Survey Scoring (SF36) before surgery and at first year follow-up. Furthermore, the following parameters were retrospectively reviewed: age, sex, working activity, body mass index (BMI), type of degenerative disease, number of levels of fusion, operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay. RESULTS Average operative time was 230 minutes, mean estimated blood loss 170 mL, average length of hospital stay 5 days. The ODI improved from a score of 59, preoperatively, to post-operative score of 20 at first year follow-up. Average SF36 score increased from 36 to 54 (Physical Health) and from 29 to 50 (Mental Health) at first year outcome evaluation. CONCLUSION MI-TLIF with bilateral pedicle screw fixation is an excellent choice for selected patients suffering from symptomatic degenerative lumbosacral spine disease, especially secondary to recurrent disc herniations.

[1]  Junyoung Ahn,et al.  Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. , 2015, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[2]  G. Tender,et al.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of two techniques. , 2014, Chirurgia.

[3]  G. Qiu,et al.  Comparing minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a meta‐analysis , 2013, Chinese medical journal.

[4]  S. Kuh,et al.  Unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. , 2013, Neurosurgical focus.

[5]  M. McGirt,et al.  Acute Hospital Costs After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Data From a US National Database With 6106 Patients , 2012, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[6]  A. Tsahtsarlis,et al.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumber interbody fusion and degenerative lumbar spine disease , 2012, European Spine Journal.

[7]  W. Yue,et al.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[8]  R. Fessler,et al.  Perioperative and postoperative complications of single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in elderly adults , 2012, Journal of clinical neuroscience.

[9]  Ho Yeol Zhang,et al.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a single interbody cage and a tubular retraction system : technical tips, and perioperative, radiologic and clinical outcomes. , 2010, Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.

[10]  Fang Xiangqian,et al.  Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Diseases , 2010, Spine.

[11]  A. Villavicencio,et al.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion , 2010, Surgical neurology international.

[12]  W. Yue,et al.  Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion , 2009, Spine.

[13]  S. Ha,et al.  Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion , 2009 .

[14]  C. Schizas,et al.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience , 2009, International Orthopaedics.

[15]  Kevin T Foley,et al.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: indications, technique, and complications. , 2006, Neurosurgical focus.

[16]  P. Santiago,et al.  Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[17]  Kevin T Foley,et al.  Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF): Technical Feasibility and Initial Results , 2005, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[18]  Kevin T Foley,et al.  Advances in minimally invasive spine surgery. , 2002, Clinical neurosurgery.

[19]  J. Partanen,et al.  Local Denervation Atrophy of Paraspinal Muscles in Postoperative Failed Back Syndrome , 1993, Spine.

[20]  J. Harms,et al.  [A one-stager procedure in operative treatment of spondylolistheses: dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion (author's transl)]. , 2008, Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete.