Effects of visual distractors on vergence eye movements

Visual attention is an important aspect of everyday life, which can be incorporated in the assessment of many diagnoses. Another important characteristic of visual attention is that it can be improved via therapeutic interventions. Fifteen subjects with normal binocular vision were presented with visual distractor stimuli at various spatial locations while initiating disparity vergence eye movements (inward or outward rotation of eyes) within a haploscope system. First, a stationary distractor stimulus was presented in either the far, middle, or near visual spaces while the subjects were instructed to follow a target stimulus that was either stationary, converging (moving toward subject), or diverging (moving away from subject). For the second experiment, a dynamic distractor stimulus within the far, middle, or near visual space that was converging or diverging was presented while the target stimulus was also converging or diverging. The subjects were instructed to visually follow the target stimulus and ignore the distractor stimulus. The vergence responses had a final vergence angle between the target and distractor stimuli which has been termed a center of gravity (CoG) effect. Statistically significant differences were observed between the convergence peak velocities (p < 0.001) and response amplitudes (p < 0.001) comparing responses without distractors to responses with the presence of a vergence distractor. The results support that vergence eye movements are influenced by visual distractors, which is similar to how distractors influence saccadic eye movements. The influence of visual distractors within vergence eye movements may be useful to assess binocular dysfunction and visual distraction which are common post brain injury.

[1]  Tara L. Alvarez,et al.  Evidence for separate control of slow version and vergence eye movements: support for Hering's Law , 1998, Vision Research.

[2]  A. Fuchs,et al.  Further properties of the human saccadic system: eye movements and correction saccades with and without visual fixation points. , 1969, Vision research.

[3]  A. Lévy-schoen.  Détermination et latence de la réponse oculomotrice à deux stimulus simultanés ou successifs selon leur excentricité relative , 1969 .

[4]  Christian Coëffé,et al.  Reducing the influence of non-target stimuli on saccade accuracy: Predictability and latency effects , 1987, Vision Research.

[5]  M. T. Bergen,et al.  Short-term predictive changes in the dynamics of disparity vergence eye movements. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[6]  S. Coren,et al.  Effect of Non-Target Stimuli upon Length of Voluntary Saccades , 1972, Perceptual and motor skills.

[7]  L M Optican,et al.  Saccade-vergence interactions in humans. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  You Yun Lee,et al.  Quantitative assessment of divergence eye movements. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[9]  Tara L. Alvarez,et al.  Divergence eye movements are dependent on initial stimulus position , 2005, Vision Research.

[10]  Michael W. Spratling,et al.  A neural model of binocular saccade planning and vergence control , 2015, Adapt. Behav..

[11]  Yi Guo,et al.  VisualEyes: a modular software system for oculomotor experimentation. , 2011, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[12]  H. Galiana,et al.  Modulation of vergence during the vestibulo-ocular reflex , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[13]  Tara L. Alvarez,et al.  Comparison of disparity vergence system responses to predictable and non-predictable stimulations , 2002 .

[14]  Bharat B. Biswal,et al.  Functional anatomy of predictive vergence and saccade eye movements in humans: A functional MRI investigation , 2010, Vision Research.

[15]  T. Alvarez,et al.  Brief intermittent light stimulation disrupts saccadic oculomotor control , 2008, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[16]  T. Alvarez,et al.  Adaptation to Progressive Additive Lenses: Potential Factors to Consider , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[17]  T. Alvarez,et al.  The influence of age on adaptation of disparity vergence and phoria , 2017, Vision Research.

[18]  Laurence R. Harris,et al.  Small Saccades to Double-Stepped Targets Moving in Two Dimensions , 1984 .

[19]  J. Semmlow,et al.  Saccadic Behavior during the Response to Pure Disparity Vergence Stimuli I : General Properties , 2008 .

[20]  T. Alvarez,et al.  Analysis of saccades and peak velocity to symmetrical convergence stimuli: binocularly normal controls compared to convergence insufficiency patients. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[21]  B. L. Zuber,et al.  Frequency characteristics of the saccadic eye movement. , 1968, Biophysical journal.

[22]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  Fixation stability and saccadic latency in élite shooters , 2003, Vision Research.

[23]  R. Walker,et al.  Curved saccade trajectories: Voluntary and reflexive saccades curve away from irrelevant distractors , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Spontaneous fixation tendencies for visual forms , 1969 .

[25]  J. Semmlow,et al.  Correction of Saccade-Induced Midline Errors in Responses to Pure Disparity Vergence Stimuli. , 2009 .

[26]  J L Semmlow,et al.  Closely spaced, fast dynamic movements in disparity vergence. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  H. Deubel,et al.  Effect of remote distractors on saccade programming: evidence for an extended fixation zone. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Hans Supèr,et al.  A Role of Eye Vergence in Covert Attention , 2013, PloS one.

[29]  N. Shimizu.  [Neurology of eye movements]. , 2000, Rinsho shinkeigaku = Clinical neurology.

[30]  D. Cicchetti.  Guidelines, Criteria, and Rules of Thumb for Evaluating Normed and Standardized Assessment Instruments in Psychology. , 1994 .

[31]  J. Wallman,et al.  Salient Distractors Can Induce Saccade Adaptation , 2014, Journal of ophthalmology.

[32]  Tara L Alvarez,et al.  The relationship between phoria and the ratio of convergence peak velocity to divergence peak velocity. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[33]  Tara L. Alvarez,et al.  Disparity vergence double responses processed by internal error , 2000, Vision Research.

[34]  Bharat B Biswal,et al.  Concurrent Vision Dysfunctions in Convergence Insufficiency With Traumatic Brain Injury , 2012, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[35]  Bharat B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in vergence and saccade eye movement tasks assessed using Granger Causality Analysis , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[36]  T. Alvarez,et al.  The frequency of horizontal saccades in near and far symmetrical disparity vergence , 2012, Vision Research.

[37]  K. Jellinger.  The Neurology of Eye Movements 4th edn. , 2009 .

[38]  Bharat B. Biswal,et al.  Task-Modulated Coactivation of Vergence Neural Substrates , 2014, Brain Connect..

[39]  J. Semmlow,et al.  Saccadic Behavior during the Response to Pure Vergence Stimuli I: General Properties , 2007 .

[40]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Relation between saccade trajectories and spatial distractor locations. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.