Human capital analytics: too much data and analysis, not enough models and business insights

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to address the barriers to the rapid development of effective HR analytics capabilities in organizations. Design/methodology/approach Literature and conceptual review of the current state of HR analytics. Findings “HR analytics” is used to refer to a too-wide array of measurement and analytical approaches, making strategic focus difficult. There is a misconception that doing more measurement of HR activities and human capital will necessarily lead to actionable insights. There is too much focus on incremental improvement of existing HR processes, detracting from diagnosing the problems with business performance. Too much time is spent on mining existing data, to the detriment of model building and testing, including collecting new more appropriate data. Too much energy is consumed with basic tasks of data management. Stakeholders avoid action by nitpicking the details of the data. Practical implications Practitioners who follow the guidance provided should find that their application of HR analytics leads to more relevant and actionable insights. Social implications More effective application of HR analytics should lead to better decision making in organizations and more effective resource allocation. Originality/value A new look at the field of HR analytics that synthesizes the research literature and current practice in organizations.

[1]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  The Competent Manager: A Model for Effective Performance , 1982 .

[2]  E. Schein.  Organizational Culture and Leadership , 1991 .

[3]  David C. McClelland,et al.  Talent and Society , 1959 .

[4]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Organization Design , 1977 .

[5]  C. Gibson.  Me and us: differential relationships among goal‐setting training, efficacy and effectiveness at the individual and team level , 2001 .

[6]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Useful Research: Advancing Theory and Practice , 2011 .

[7]  D. Harrison,et al.  TIES, LEADERS, AND TIME IN TEAMS: STRONG INFERENCE ABOUT NETWORK STRUCTURE'S EFFECTS ON TEAM VIABILITY AND PERFORMANCE , 2006 .

[8]  Dustin K. Jundt,et al.  HOW DIFFERENT TEAM DOWNSIZING APPROACHES INFLUENCE TEAM-LEVEL ADAPTATION AND PERFORMANCE , 2008 .

[9]  J. Hackman,et al.  Employee reactions to job characteristics. , 1971 .

[10]  J. F. Byrnes,et al.  Costing Human Resources: The Financial Impact of Behavior in Organizations , 1984 .

[11]  M. Hatch.  The Dynamics of Organizational Culture , 1993 .

[12]  Edward E. Lawler,et al.  Motivation in Work Organizations , 1975 .

[13]  V. Vroom.  Work and motivation , 1964 .

[14]  S. Kerr.  On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. , 1975 .

[15]  John J. Mauriel,et al.  A Framework for Linking Culture and Improvement Initiatives in Organizations , 2000 .

[16]  J. Mathieu,et al.  CREATIVITY AND STANDARDIZATION: COMPLEMENTARY OR CONFLICTING DRIVERS OF TEAM EFFECTIVENESS? , 2005 .

[17]  Y. Wiener,et al.  Forms of Value Systems: Focus on Organizational Effectiveness and Cultural Change and Maintenance , 1988 .

[18]  Brian E. Becker,et al.  The HR Scorecard: Linking People, Strategy, and Performance , 2001 .

[19]  John W. Boudreau,et al.  Beyond HR: The New Science of Human Capital , 2007 .

[20]  Gary P. Latham,et al.  Work Motivation: History, Theory, Research, and Practice , 2011 .

[21]  S. Sackmann.  Culture and Subcultures: An Analysis of Organizational Knowledge , 1992 .

[22]  R. Wageman.  How Leaders Foster Self-Managing Team Effectiveness: Design Choices Versus Hands-on Coaching , 2001 .

[23]  J. Hackman,et al.  A theory of team coaching , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[24]  Douglas T. Hall,et al.  An alternative approach and new guidelines for practice , 1999 .

[25]  A. Maslow.  Motivation and Personality , 1954 .

[26]  Aparna Joshi,et al.  Who Defers to Whom and Why? Dual Pathways Linking Demographic Differences and Dyadic Deference to Team Effectiveness , 2015 .

[27]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[28]  John H. Zenger,et al.  The Extraordinary Leader: Turning Good Managers into Great Leaders , 2002 .

[29]  Edward E. Lawler,et al.  Doing Research That Is Useful for Theory and Practice , 1999 .

[30]  Eric Flamholtz,et al.  Human resource accounting , 1988 .

[31]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness: Development of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale for Self and Peer Evaluation , 2012 .

[32]  Daniel Solow,et al.  Understanding the Role of Worker Interdependence in Team Selection , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[33]  C. Tromley,et al.  From incremental change to retrofit: Creating high-performance work systems , 1995 .

[34]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[35]  N. Phillips,et al.  COERCED PRACTICE IMPLEMENTATION IN CASES OF LOW CULTURAL FIT: CULTURAL CHANGE AND PRACTICE ADAPTATION DURING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SIX SIGMA AT 3M , 2013 .

[36]  Lyle M. Spencer,et al.  Competence at Work: Models for Superior Performance , 1993 .

[37]  Donald L. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Evaluating Training Programs : The Four Levels , 2009 .

[38]  R. Likert,et al.  Human Resource Accounting: A Human Organizational Measurement Approach, Part II , 1971 .

[39]  Michael A. Roberto,et al.  The Art of Making Change Initiatives Stick , 2005 .

[40]  F. Herzberg.  One more time: how do you motivate employees? 1968. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[41]  W. Wilhelm.  Changing corporate culture—or corporate behavior? How to change your company , 1992 .

[42]  Eric G. Flamholtz,et al.  Human resource accounting: a historical perspective and future implications , 2002 .

[43]  G. Gordon.  Industry Determinants of Organizational Culture , 1991 .

[44]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Impact of Team Empowerment on Virtual Team Performance: The Moderating Role of Face-to-Face Interaction , 2004 .