Automatic alignment of EEG/MEG and MRI data sets

OBJECTIVES We developed a new technique of fully automatic alignment of brain data acquired with scalp sensors (e.g. electroencephalography/evoked potential (EP) electrodes, magnetoencephalography sensors) with a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volume of the head. METHODS The method uses geometrical features (two sets of head points: digitized from the subject and extracted from MRI) to guide the alignment. It combines matching on 3 dimensional (3D) geometrical moments that perform the initial alignment, and 3D distance-based alignment that provides the final tuning. To reduce errors of the initial guessed computation resulting from digitization of the head surface points we introduced weights to compute geometrical moments, and a procedure to remove outliers to eliminate incorrectly digitized points. RESULTS The method was tested on simulated (Monte Carlo trials) and on real data sets. The simulations demonstrated that for the number of test points within the range of 0.1-1% of the total number of head surface points and for the digitization error in the range of -2-2 mm the average map error was between 0.7 and 2.1 mm. The average distance error was less than 1 mm. Tests on real data gave the average distance error between 2.1 and 2.5 mm. CONCLUSIONS The developed technique is fast, robust and comfortable for the patient and for medical personnel. It registers scalp sensor positions with MRI head volume with accuracy that is satisfactory for localization of biological processes examined with a commonly used number of scalp sensors (32, 64, or 128).

[1]  A. Dale,et al.  Improved Localizadon of Cortical Activity by Combining EEG and MEG with MRI Cortical Surface Reconstruction: A Linear Approach , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  Richard A. Robb,et al.  New approach to 3-D registration of multimodality medical images by surface matching , 1992, Other Conferences.

[3]  R Tarnecki,et al.  Presentation of brain electrical activity distribution on its cortex surface derived from MR images. , 1998, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[4]  Gunilla Borgefors,et al.  Hierarchical Chamfer Matching: A Parametric Edge Matching Algorithm , 1988, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  J R Ives,et al.  3D localization of surface 10-20 EEG electrodes on high resolution anatomical MR images. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[7]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C. The art of scientific computing , 1987 .

[8]  C. Pelizzari,et al.  Accurate Three‐Dimensional Registration of CT, PET, and/or MR Images of the Brain , 1989, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[9]  C. Pelizzari,et al.  Retrospective geometric correlation of MR, CT, and PET images. , 1988, Radiology.

[10]  William H. Press,et al.  The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition , 1998 .

[11]  S Warach,et al.  Monitoring the patient's EEG during echo planar MRI. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  J. W. Humberston Classical mechanics , 1980, Nature.

[13]  Lyndon S. Hibbard,et al.  Objective image alignment for three-dimensional reconstruction of digital autoradiograms , 1988, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[15]  C H Lücking,et al.  Estimation of the accuracy of a surface matching technique for registration of EEG and MRI data. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  P. Danielsson Euclidean distance mapping , 1980 .

[17]  Cengizhan Ozturk,et al.  Multidimensional Alignment Using the Euclidean Distance Transform , 1997, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[18]  M. Viergever,et al.  Medical image matching-a review with classification , 1993, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[19]  R J Ilmoniemi,et al.  Dynamic neuroimaging of brain function. , 1995, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[20]  M Steriade,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of sleep delta waves. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[21]  K D Singh,et al.  Evaluation of MRI-MEG/EEG co-registration strategies using Monte Carlo simulation. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  Deepak Khosla,et al.  Spatial mislocalization of EEG electrodes – effects on accuracy of dipole estimation , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[23]  F Babiloni,et al.  High resolution EEG: a new model-dependent spatial deblurring method using a realistically-shaped MR-constructed subject's head model. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  K. K. Tan,et al.  The spatial location of EEG electrodes: locating the best-fitting sphere relative to cortical anatomy. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[25]  C C Wood,et al.  Mapping function in the human brain with magnetoencephalography, anatomical magnetic resonance imaging, and functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[26]  Jürgen Vieth,et al.  PRECISE FUSION OF MEG AND MRI TOMOGRAPHY USING A SURFACE FIT , 1993 .