Teaching the Process of Science: Faculty Perceptions and an Effective Methodology

Most scientific endeavors require science process skills such as data interpretation, problem solving, experimental design, scientific writing, oral communication, collaborative work, and critical analysis of primary literature. These are the fundamental skills upon which the conceptual framework of scientific expertise is built. Unfortunately, most college science departments lack a formalized curriculum for teaching undergraduates science process skills. However, evidence strongly suggests that explicitly teaching undergraduates skills early in their education may enhance their understanding of science content. Our research reveals that faculty overwhelming support teaching undergraduates science process skills but typically do not spend enough time teaching skills due to the perceived need to cover content. To encourage faculty to address this issue, we provide our pedagogical philosophies, methods, and materials for teaching science process skills to freshman pursuing life science majors. We build upon previous work, showing student learning gains in both reading primary literature and scientific writing, and share student perspectives about a course where teaching the process of science, not content, was the focus. We recommend a wider implementation of courses that teach undergraduates science process skills early in their studies with the goals of improving student success and retention in the sciences and enhancing general science literacy.

[1]  Patrick Hartigan,et al.  Making IT , 2006 .

[2]  William R. Veal,et al.  Using Self-Reflection To Increase Science Process Skills in the General Chemistry Laboratory , 2009 .

[3]  Kathleen Hogan,et al.  Comparing the Epistemological Underpinnings of Students' and Scientists' Reasoning about Conclusions. , 2001 .

[4]  Jon Kolko,et al.  On education , 2010, INTR.

[5]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[6]  David N. Steer,et al.  Assessment and Active Learning Strategies for Introductory Geology Courses , 2003 .

[7]  William J. Straits,et al.  Practical Advice for Teaching Inquiry-Based Science Process Skills in the Biological Sciences , 2005 .

[8]  Kathleen M Gehring,et al.  Information fluency for undergraduate biology majors: applications of inquiry-based learning in a developmental biology course. , 2008, CBE life sciences education.

[9]  S. Debburman,et al.  Learning how scientists work: experiential research projects to promote cell biology learning and scientific process skills. , 2002, Cell biology education.

[10]  Michael W Klymkowsky,et al.  Points of view: content versus process: is this a fair choice? Can nonmajors courses lead to biological literacy? Do majors courses do any better? , 2005, Cell biology education.

[11]  Sally G Hoskins,et al.  Selective Use of the Primary Literature Transforms the Classroom Into a Virtual Laboratory , 2007, Genetics.

[12]  Ralph W. Preszler.  Student- and Teacher-Centered Learning in a Supplemental Learning Biology Course. , 2006 .

[13]  Marc Levis-Fitzgerald,et al.  An intensive primary-literature-based teaching program directly benefits undergraduate science majors and facilitates their transition to doctoral programs. , 2006, CBE life sciences education.

[14]  P. Shah,et al.  Review of Graph Comprehension Research: Implications for Instruction , 2002 .

[15]  S. Muench,et al.  Choosing Primary Literature in Biology To Achieve Specific Educational Goals. , 2000 .

[16]  J. Novak.  Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education , 1990 .

[17]  Kay H. Yeoman,et al.  Investigating the Impact on Skill Development of an Undergraduate Scientific Research Skills Course , 2008 .

[18]  Lin Ding,et al.  Learning and Scientific Reasoning , 2009, Science.

[19]  Gayle Nicoll,et al.  An Investigation of the Factors Influencing Student Performance in Physical Chemistry , 2001 .

[20]  C. Kardash,et al.  Evaluation of an Undergraduate Research Experience: Perceptions of Undergraduate Interns and Their Faculty Mentors. , 2000 .

[21]  Uri Wilensky,et al.  ConnectedScience: Learning Biology through Constructing and Testing Computational Theories -- an Embodied Modeling Approach , 1998 .

[22]  P. Brickman,et al.  Effects of Inquiry-based Learning on Students’ Science Literacy Skills and Confidence , 2009 .

[23]  Russell Souchek,et al.  Teaching Information Literacy and Scientific Process Skills: An Integrated Approach , 1997 .

[24]  William B. Wood.  Revising the AP Biology Curriculum , 2009, Science.

[25]  Eleanor Duckworth,et al.  Science Education: A Minds-on Approach for the Elementary Years , 1990 .

[26]  Diane M. Bunce,et al.  THE USE OF THE GALT (GROUP ASSESSMENT OF LOGICAL THINKING) AS A PREDICTOR OF ACADEMIC SUCCESS IN COLLEGE CHEMISTRY , 1993 .

[27]  D. Janick-Buckner.  Getting Undergraduates To Critically Read and Discuss Primary Literature. , 1997 .

[28]  Karen Sirum,et al.  Enabling a Culture of Change: A Life Science Faculty Learning Community Promotes Scientific Teaching. , 2009 .

[29]  Clarissa Dirks,et al.  Enhancing diversity in science: is teaching science process skills the answer? , 2006, CBE life sciences education.

[30]  L. Fink,et al.  Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses , 2003 .

[31]  William H. Leonard.  How Do College Students Best Learn Science , 2000 .

[32]  Suzanne Reeve,et al.  Teaching cell biology in the large-enrollment classroom: methods to promote analytical thinking and assessment of their effectiveness. , 2003, Cell biology education.

[33]  Bruce Alberts,et al.  Making a Science of Education , 2009, Science.

[34]  Julie Maxwell-Jolly,et al.  Priming the Pump: Strategies for Increasing the Achievement of Underrepresented Minority Undergraduates. , 1999 .

[35]  Melvin D. George,et al.  Effective practices in undergraduate STEM education part 1: examining the evidence. , 2009, CBE life sciences education.

[36]  C. Hansel.  Scientific Teaching , 1972, Nature.

[37]  Elaine Seymour,et al.  The loss of women from science, mathematics, and engineering undergraduate majors: An explanatory account , 1995 .

[38]  D. Allen,et al.  Putting the horse back in front of the cart: using visions and decisions about high-quality learning experiences to drive course design. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[39]  E. Seymour,et al.  Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences , 1997 .

[40]  J. Dewey,et al.  How We Think , 2009 .

[41]  Lorrie A. Shepard,et al.  Linking Formative Assessment to Scaffolding , 2005 .

[42]  John Brooks,et al.  In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms , 1993 .

[43]  Division on Earth.  BIO2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists , 2003 .

[44]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[45]  LaRhee Henderson,et al.  A Peer-Reviewed Research Assignment for Large Classes. , 2000 .

[46]  John Airey,et al.  A disciplinary discourse perspective on university science learning: Achieving fluency in a critical constellation of modes , 2009 .

[47]  Diane Ebert-May,et al.  Scientific Teaching , 2004, Science.