Spoiler Alert

As suggested by the common phrase “spoiler alert!” many people avoid spoilers for narrative entertainment. However, recent research has found that exposure to spoilers may actually enhance enjoyment. The present study sought to replicate and extend those findings with a multidimensional approach to enjoyment and by examining choice of spoiled versus unspoiled narratives. Comprehension theories suggest that spoilers should improve media appreciation, whereas excitation-transfer theory suggests that spoilers harm arousal and suspense. Additionally, media users’ conventionally held beliefs imply that respondents should choose unspoiled stories. A within-subjects experiment (N = 412) tested these hypotheses. As expected, unspoiled stories were more fun and suspenseful. Surprisingly, unspoiled stories were also more moving and enjoyable in general. No effect of media choice emerged.

[1]  Peter Vorderer,et al.  Suspense : Conceptualizations, Theoretical Analyses, and Empirical Explorations , 2009 .

[2]  Mary Beth Oliver and Julia K. Woolley.  Tragic and poignant entertainment: The gratifications of meaningfulness as emotional response , 2010 .

[3]  Dolf Zillmann,et al.  Dramaturgy for Emotions from Fictional Narration. , 2006 .

[4]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[5]  Robert J. Lewis,et al.  Characterizing Mood Management as Need Satisfaction: The Effects of Intrinsic Needs on Selective Exposure and Mood Repair , 2012 .

[6]  F. Al-Shamali,et al.  Author Biographies. , 2015, Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation.

[7]  Christoph Klimmt.  Media Psychology and Complex Modes of Entertainment Experiences , 2011, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..

[8]  Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick,et al.  Mystery Appeal: Effects of Uncertainty and Resolution on the Enjoyment of Mystery , 2006 .

[9]  Nicholas Christenfeld,et al.  The fluency of spoilers: Why giving away endings improves stories , 2013 .

[10]  Geoff F. Kaufman,et al.  Understanding Media Enjoyment: The Role of Transportation Into Narrative Worlds , 2004 .

[11]  Melanie C. Green,et al.  Transportation Across Media: Repeated Exposure to Print and Film , 2008 .

[12]  Jennings Bryant,et al.  The effect of suspense and its resolution on the appreciation of dramatic presentations , 1975 .

[13]  Christoph Klimmt,et al.  A Process Model of the Formation of Spatial Presence Experiences , 2007 .

[14]  W. Kintsch.  Learning from text, levels of comprehension, or: Why anyone would read a story anyway , 1980 .

[15]  Dan Hassoun,et al.  Sequential outliers: the role of spoilers in comic book reading , 2013 .

[16]  Helena Bilandzic,et al.  Measuring Narrative Engagement , 2009 .

[17]  Alice Hall,et al.  Challenging Entertainment: Enjoyment, Transportation, and Need for Cognition in Relation to Fictional Films Viewed Online , 2012 .

[18]  Marvin Zuckerman.  Sensation Seeking in Entertainment. , 2006 .

[19]  Satoshi Nakamura,et al.  Study of information clouding methods to prevent spoilers of sports match , 2012, AVI.

[20]  Leigh Ann Vaughn,et al.  Regulatory Fit, Processing Fluency, and Narrative Persuasion , 2010 .

[21]  Arthur A. Raney.  Expanding Disposition Theory: Reconsidering Character Liking, Moral Evaluations, and Enjoyment , 2004 .

[22]  Marina Krcmar,et al.  Conceptualizing Media Enjoyment as Attitude: Implications for Mass Media Effects Research , 2004 .

[23]  Ron Tamborini,et al.  Defining Media Enjoyment as the Satisfaction of Intrinsic Needs , 2010 .

[24]  Mary Beth Oliver,et al.  Making Sense of Entertainment , 2011, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..

[25]  Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick.  Mood Management: Theory, Evidence, and Advancements , 2013 .

[26]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Narrative Persuasion and Overcoming Resistance. , 2004 .

[27]  P. Tannenbaum.  The Entertainment Functions of Television , 1980 .

[28]  Markus Appel,et al.  Predicting Emotions and Meta-Emotions at the Movies: The Role of the Need for Affect in Audiences’ Experience of Horror and Drama , 2010, Commun. Res..

[29]  N. Christenfeld,et al.  Story Spoilers Don’t Spoil Stories , 2011, Psychological science.

[30]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[31]  J. Bryant,et al.  Responding to the screen : reception and reaction processes , 1991 .

[32]  Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick,et al.  Caught in the Act: Measuring Selective Exposure to Experimental Online Stimuli , 2013 .

[33]  P. Vorderer,et al.  Psychological Escapism: Predicting the Amount of Television Viewing by Need for Cognition , 2001 .

[34]  Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick,et al.  Murder for Pleasure , 2008, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..

[35]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[36]  W. Brewer.  The Nature of Narrative Suspense and the Problem of Rereading , 2013 .

[37]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[38]  D. Zillmann.  Excitation transfer in communication-mediated aggressive behavior , 1971 .

[39]  Mary Beth Oliver,et al.  Tragic and poignant entertainment , 2010 .

[40]  T. Brock,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology the Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives Text Quality Individual Differences and Situational Influences Transportation Scale Items Gender Differences Discriminant Validation: Need for Cognition Effect of Text Manipulation Beli , 2022 .

[41]  M. Oliver,et al.  Appreciation as Audience Response: Exploring Entertainment Gratifications beyond Hedonism. , 2010 .

[42]  G. Mandler,et al.  Constructions of emotion: Discrepancy, arousal, and mood , 1989 .

[43]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  D. Zillmann,et al.  Mood Management via the Digital Jukebox , 2002 .

[45]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.