Time-frequency analysis and simulation of the watershed suspended sediment concentration based on the Hilbert-Huang transform (HHT) and artificial neural network (ANN) methods: A case study in the Loess Plateau of China

Abstract Suspended sediment concentration (SSC) time series are highly nonlinear and nonstationary due to numerous influencing factors that can be characterized by specific time scales, thereby increasing the difficulty of performing SSC simulations. Analyzing the spectral and temporal information of the SSC and its contributing factors can improve the resulting simulation efforts. In this study, the Hilbert-Huang transform (HHT) was used to identify the time scales and change trends of the daily SSC, rainfall, runoff and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) of the Kuye River in the Loess Plateau of China. Artificial neural network (ANN), multiple linear regression (MLR), hybrid ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD)-ANN and EEMD-MLR models were chosen to simulate the SSC time series. The periods of the rainfall intrinsic mode functions (IMFs, except IMF9 and 10) were generally consistent with those of the IMFs corresponding to the SSC and runoff. In comparison, the periods of the IMFs corresponding to the NDVI were longer. The minimal period was 3 days for the SSC, rainfall and runoff and 10 days for the NDVI. The minimal period displays the greatest variance contribution and plays the most important role in the SSC, rainfall and runoff changes. The annual cycle has the largest contribution to the NDVI variability. Residual components indicated that the SSC of the Kuye River decreased from 2006 to 2010, while the regional rainfall, runoff and NDVI increased. The R2 values of the ANN and MLR models were 0.34 and 0.39, respectively. Compared with the MLR and ANN models, the R2 values of the EEMD-ANN and EEMD-MLR models increased by 52.9% and 41.0%, respectively, indicating that the ANN model was more robust than the MLR model when simulating nonlinear SSC time series. Compared with EMD, EEMD can alleviate the mode mixing problem and significantly increase the simulation accuracy with the ANN and MLR models. Significance tests were employed to determine the strength of the physical meaning in each IMF component. Taking IMFs with significant (p

[1]  Mukesh K. Tiwari,et al.  Intermittent Streamflow Forecasting and Extreme Event Modelling using Wavelet based Artificial Neural Networks , 2014, Water Resources Management.

[2]  G. Sahoo,et al.  Forecasting stream water temperature using regression analysis, artificial neural network, and chaotic non-linear dynamic models , 2009 .

[3]  Dong Wang,et al.  The relation between periods’ identification and noises in hydrologic series data , 2009 .

[4]  Junxing Cao,et al.  Does mode mixing matter in EMD-based highlight volume methods for hydrocarbon detection? Experimental evidence , 2016 .

[5]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Advances in Box‐Jenkins modeling: 2. Applications , 1977 .

[6]  Samuela Franceschini,et al.  Application of Hilbert-Huang Transform Method for Analyzing Toxic Concentrations in the Niagara River , 2010 .

[7]  Ozgur Kisi,et al.  River Flow Estimation and Forecasting by Using Two Different Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Approaches , 2012, Water Resources Management.

[8]  James F. Epperson,et al.  An Introduction to Numerical Methods and Analysis , 2001 .

[9]  M. Valipour,et al.  Comparison of the ARMA, ARIMA, and the autoregressive artificial neural network models in forecasting the monthly inflow of Dez dam reservoir , 2013 .

[10]  Jianhua Xu,et al.  Multiscale evolution of surface air temperature in the arid region of Northwest China and its linkages to ocean oscillations , 2017, Theoretical and Applied Climatology.

[11]  Tanweer S. Desmukh,et al.  Application of Artificial Neural Network in Hydrology- A Review , 2015 .

[12]  Taher Rajaee,et al.  Wavelet and ANN combination model for prediction of daily suspended sediment load in rivers. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  Lei Ai,et al.  Modeling the daily suspended sediment concentration in a hyperconcentrated river on the Loess Plateau, China, using the Wavelet–ANN approach , 2013 .

[14]  Jianhua Xu,et al.  Multi-scale response of runoff to climate fluctuation in the headwater region of Kaidu River in Xinjiang of China , 2016, Theoretical and Applied Climatology.

[15]  Rajita Sinha,et al.  Greater activation of the “default” brain regions predicts stop signal errors , 2007, NeuroImage.

[16]  Xixi Lu,et al.  Hydrological responses to precipitation variation and diverse human activities in a mountainous tributary of the lower Xijiang, China , 2009 .

[17]  Turgay Partal,et al.  Estimation and forecasting of daily suspended sediment data using wavelet–neural networks , 2008 .

[18]  Norden E. Huang,et al.  Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition: a Noise-Assisted Data Analysis Method , 2009, Adv. Data Sci. Adapt. Anal..

[19]  Norden E. Huang,et al.  STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE TEST OF INTRINSIC MODE FUNCTIONS , 2010 .

[20]  Chien-Ming Chou,et al.  Application of wavelet‐based multi‐model Kalman filters to real‐time flood forecasting , 2004 .

[21]  Li-Feng Lu,et al.  Rainfall, runoff, and suspended sediment delivery relationships in a small agricultural watershed of the Three Gorges area, China , 2011 .

[22]  M. Alizadeh,et al.  A new approach for simulating and forecasting the rainfall-runoff process within the next two months , 2017 .

[23]  J. Poesen,et al.  Predicting soil erosion and sediment yield at regional scales: Where do we stand? , 2013 .

[24]  Quanqin Shao,et al.  Assessing the effects of land use and topography on soil erosion on the Loess Plateau in China , 2014 .

[25]  S. S. Shen,et al.  Applications of Hilbert–Huang transform to non‐stationary financial time series analysis , 2003 .

[26]  Chuntian Cheng,et al.  A comparison of performance of several artificial intelligence , 2009 .

[27]  Dennis A. Lyn,et al.  Unsteady Sediment‐Transport Modeling , 1987 .

[28]  Q. Tan,et al.  An adaptive middle and long-term runoff forecast model using EEMD-ANN hybrid approach , 2018, Journal of Hydrology.

[29]  Yu Yang,et al.  Partly ensemble empirical mode decomposition: An improved noise-assisted method for eliminating mode mixing , 2014, Signal Process..

[30]  Ozgur Kisi,et al.  Applications of hybrid wavelet–Artificial Intelligence models in hydrology: A review , 2014 .

[31]  Ashish Sharma,et al.  A study of optimal model lag and spatial inputs to artificial neural network for rainfall forecasting , 2000 .

[32]  Anzhi Wang,et al.  Analysis of impacts of climate variability and human activity on streamflow for a river basin in northeast China , 2011 .

[33]  S. S. Shen,et al.  A confidence limit for the empirical mode decomposition and Hilbert spectral analysis , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[34]  Chongli Di,et al.  Multi-scale analysis of streamflow using the Hilbert-Huang Transform , 2014 .

[35]  B. Fu,et al.  Evolution of ecosystem services in the Chinese Loess Plateau under climatic and land use changes , 2013 .

[36]  Mingguo Zheng,et al.  The spatio-temporal invariability of sediment concentration and the flow–sediment relationship for hilly areas of the Chinese Loess Plateau , 2013 .

[37]  Xuehua Zhao,et al.  Auto Regressive and Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition Hybrid Model for Annual Runoff Forecasting , 2015, Water Resources Management.

[38]  J. Heo,et al.  Identification of relationships between climate indices and long-term precipitation in South Korea using ensemble empirical mode decomposition , 2018 .

[39]  Kwok-wing Chau,et al.  Improving Forecasting Accuracy of Annual Runoff Time Series Using ARIMA Based on EEMD Decomposition , 2015, Water Resources Management.

[40]  W. Weeks,et al.  Tests of ARMA model forms for rainfall-runoff modelling , 1987 .

[41]  Norden E. Huang,et al.  A review on Hilbert‐Huang transform: Method and its applications to geophysical studies , 2008 .

[42]  Christina W. Tsai,et al.  Identification of varying time scales in sediment transport using the Hilbert–Huang Transform method , 2012 .

[43]  Yongxiang Huang,et al.  Analysis of daily river flow fluctuations using Empirical Mode Decomposition and arbitrary order Hilbert spectral analysis , 2009 .

[44]  Shengzhi Huang,et al.  Monthly streamflow prediction using modified EMD-based support vector machine , 2014 .

[45]  Donald H. Burn,et al.  Non-stationary pooled flood frequency analysis , 2003 .

[46]  Ozgur Kisi,et al.  Two hybrid Artificial Intelligence approaches for modeling rainfall–runoff process , 2011 .

[47]  Nicolas Massei,et al.  Assessing the expression of large-scale climatic fluctuations in the hydrological variability of daily Seine river flow (France) between 1950 and 2008 using Hilbert–Huang Transform , 2012 .

[48]  Di Long,et al.  Quantifying the impacts of climate change and ecological restoration on streamflow changes based on a Budyko hydrological model in China's Loess Plateau , 2015 .

[49]  Chandranath Chatterjee,et al.  Development of an accurate and reliable hourly flood forecasting model using wavelet–bootstrap–ANN (WBANN) hybrid approach , 2010 .

[50]  Huiyu Liu,et al.  Climatic and human impacts on quasi-periodic and abrupt changes of sedimentation rate at multiple time scales in Lake Taihu, China , 2016 .

[51]  Tommy S. W. Wong,et al.  Runoff forecasting for an asphalt plane by Artificial Neural Networks and comparisons with kinematic wave and autoregressive moving average models , 2011 .

[52]  Guiping Wu,et al.  Quantitative analysis of factors controlling sediment yield in mountainous watersheds , 2014 .

[53]  H. Altun,et al.  Treatment of multi-dimensional data to enhance neural network estimators in regression problems , 2006 .