Body schema and body image—Pros and cons

[1]  A. Mussap,et al.  Rubber-Hand Illusion , 2012 .

[2]  F. Vignemont.  A Mosquito Bite Against the Enactive Approach to Bodily Experiences , 2011 .

[3]  N. Gangopadhyay,et al.  Perception, action, and consciousness , 2010 .

[4]  Marjolein P. M. Kammers,et al.  How many motoric body representations can we grasp? , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  H. Chris Dijkerman,et al.  The weight of representing the body: addressing the potentially indefinite number of body representations in healthy individuals , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Laurent Cleret de Langavant,et al.  Heterotopagnosia: When I point at parts of your body , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  E. Haan,et al.  A double dissociation between somatosensory processing for perception and action , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Marjolein P. M. Kammers,et al.  The rubber hand illusion in action , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  M. Goodale,et al.  Two visual systems re-viewed , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  G. Carruthers.  Types of body representation and the sense of embodiment , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[11]  N. Block.  Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[12]  Morgan Wallhagen.  Consciousness and Action: Does Cognitive Science Support (Mild) Epiphenomenalism? , 2007, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[13]  P. Haggard,et al.  The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[14]  H. C. Dijkerman,et al.  Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  David Travieso,et al.  Haptic perception is a dynamic system of cutaneous, proprioceptive, and motor components , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[16]  H. C. Dijkerman,et al.  Dissociating body representations in healthy individuals: Differential effects of a kinaesthetic illusion on perception and action , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  Y. Rossetti,et al.  No double-dissociation between optic ataxia and visual agnosia: Multiple sub-streams for multiple visuo-manual integrations , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  David P. Carey,et al.  Tapping, grasping and aiming in ideomotor apraxia , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  N. Franck,et al.  Mental rotation in schizophrenia , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[20]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Dissociation of perception and action unmasked by the hollow-face illusion , 2006, Brain Research.

[21]  Driss Boussaoud,et al.  Prehension movements in the macaque monkey: effects of perturbation of object size and location , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  Localization of Tactile Stimuli Depends on Conscious Detection , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  James Danckert,et al.  Blindsight in action: what can the different sub-types of blindsight tell us about the control of visually guided actions? , 2005, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[24]  A. Milner,et al.  Visually guided reaching: bilateral posterior parietal lesions cause a switch from fast visuomotor to slow cognitive control , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Human Body Perception From The Inside Out , 2005 .

[26]  H. Branch Coslett,et al.  Evidence for Multiple, Distinct Representations of the Human Body , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  P. Haggard,et al.  The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Trends in Cognitive Sciences , Vol . 9 No . 1 January 2005 16 Change blindness : Past , present , and future , 2005 .

[29]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Merging the senses into a robust percept , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  C. Thinus-Blanc,et al.  Pointing to body parts: a double dissociation study , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  V. Lamme.  Why visual attention and awareness are different , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  C. Guariglia,et al.  Is autotopoagnosia real? EC says yes. A case study , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  John Schwoebel,et al.  The man who executed “imagined” movements: Evidence for dissociable components of the body schema , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[34]  Raymond H. Cuijpers,et al.  Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  Alexandre Pouget,et al.  A computational perspective on the neural basis of multisensory spatial representations , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[36]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Probabilistic Models of the Brain: Perception and Neural Function , 2002 .

[37]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Perspectives and problems in motor learning , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  A. Noë,et al.  A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[39]  Dominic Palmer-Brown,et al.  Illusions in action , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  Ian H. Robertson,et al.  Improving the Clinical Diagnosis of Personal Neglect: A Reformulated Comb and Razor Test , 2000, Cortex.

[41]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  The Role of the Dynamic Body Schema in Praxis: Evidence from Primary Progressive Apraxia , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[42]  R. Zatorre,et al.  ‘What’, ‘where’ and ‘how’ in auditory cortex , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  M. Desmurget,et al.  An ‘automatic pilot’ for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: toward reinterpreting optic ataxia , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  M. Fahle,et al.  Grasping Visual Illusions: No Evidence for a Dissociation Between Perception and Action , 2000, Psychological science.

[45]  R T Knight,et al.  Spatial deficits in ideomotor limb apraxia. A kinematic analysis of aiming movements. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[46]  H. Branch Coslett,et al.  Evidence for a Disturbance of the Body Schema in Neglect , 1998, Brain and Cognition.

[47]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see , 1998, Nature.

[48]  M. Jeannerod.  The cognitive neuroscience of action , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[49]  A. Sirigu,et al.  The Mental Representation of Hand Movements After Parietal Cortex Damage , 1996, Science.

[50]  M. Goodale,et al.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand , 1995, Current Biology.

[51]  Y Rossetti,et al.  Implicit processing of somaesthetic information: a dissociation between where and how? , 1995, Neuroreport.

[52]  Georg Goldenberg,et al.  Imitating gestures and manipulating a mannikin—The representation of the human body in ideomotor apraxia , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[54]  A. Sirigu,et al.  Multiple representations contribute to body knowledge processing. Evidence from a case of autotopagnosia. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[55]  J. Marshall,et al.  Blindsight and insight in visuo-spatial neglect , 1988, Nature.

[56]  E. Bisiach,et al.  Remission of hemineglect and anosognosia during vestibular stimulation , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[57]  L M Parsons,et al.  Imagined spatial transformation of one's body. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[58]  H. Goodglass,et al.  Localization of body parts in brain injured subjects , 1985, Neuropsychologia.

[59]  F Michel,et al.  Localization without content. A tactile analogue of 'blind sight'. , 1983, Archives of neurology.

[60]  R. Weale.  Analysis of Visual Behaviour , 1983 .

[61]  J. Paillard.  [The object localized and identified. Psychophysiologic approach to the concept of body image]. , 1980, Revue medicale de la Suisse romande.

[62]  S. Spicker,et al.  Evaluation and explanation in the biomedical sciences , 1976, Medical History.

[63]  B Orgass,et al.  The concept of the body schema: a critical review and some experimental results. , 1971, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[64]  K. Poeck,et al.  [ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE BODY IMAGE. STUDIES OF NORMAL CHILDREN, BLIND CHILDREN AND CHILD AMPUTEES]. , 1964, Fortschritte der Neurologie, Psychiatrie, und ihrer Grenzgebiete.

[65]  M. Merleau-Ponty.  Phénoménologie de la perception , 1950 .

[66]  G. Holmes,et al.  Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions , 1911 .

[67]  F. Vignemont,et al.  Spatial coordinates and phenomenology in the two visual systems model , 2010 .

[68]  A. Billard,et al.  Apraxia: a review. , 2007, Progress in brain research.

[69]  C. Spence,et al.  Beyond the body schema: Visual, prosthetic, and technological contributions to bodily perception and awareness , 2006 .

[70]  Alva Noë,et al.  Action in Perception , 2006, Representation and Mind.

[71]  S. Gallagher.  How the body shapes the mind , 2005 .

[72]  D. Smith.  Consciousness in action , 2004, Synthese.

[73]  M. A. Goodale,et al.  Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[74]  J. Massion,et al.  BODY SCHEMA AND BODY IMAGE-A DOUBLE DISSOCIATION IN DEAFFERENTED PATIENTS , 2003 .

[75]  M. Landy,et al.  Bayesian Modelling of Visual Perception , 2002 .

[76]  John P. Scholz,et al.  Motor Control Today and Tomorrow , 2001 .

[77]  Y. Rossetti,et al.  Improvement of mental imagery after prism exposure in neglect: a case study. , 1998, Behavioural neurology.

[78]  Avishai Dadon-Raveh.  José Luis Bermúdez, Anthony Marcel, and Naomi Eilan (eds), The Body and the Self , 1997 .

[79]  Marcel Kinsbourne,et al.  Awareness of one's own body: An attentional theory of its nature, development, and brain basis. , 1995 .

[80]  Jonathan Cole,et al.  Living without touch and peripheral information about body position and movement: Studies with deafferented subjects. , 1995 .

[81]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[82]  Shaun Gallagher,et al.  Body Schema and Intentionality , 1995 .

[83]  A. Marcel,et al.  The body and the self , 1995 .

[84]  J. Paillard.  Brain and space , 1991 .

[85]  Shaun Gallagher,et al.  Body image and body schema: A conceptual clarification. , 1986 .

[86]  Leslie G. Ungerleider.  Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[87]  J. Paillard.  Le corps situé et le corps identifié. Une approche psychophysiologique de la notion de schéma corporel. , 1980 .

[88]  S. Spicker.  The Lived-Body as Catalytic Agent: Reaction at the Interface of Medicine and Philosophy , 1975 .

[89]  P. Haggard,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Segmenting the Body into Parts: Evidence from Biases in Tactile Perception , 2022 .