On the Optimal Pattern for Displacement Field Measurement: Random Speckle and DIC, or Checkerboard and LSA?

This paper deals with the optimal pattern that can be used to retrieve displacement fields by minimizing the optical residual calculated over small regions of contrasted images. This minimization is generally performed in the spatial domain by processing speckle patterns with DIC. Another option is also considered here. It consists in switching this minimization to the Fourier domain. The benefit is that periodic patterns can be processed, which is generally not possible with DIC. It turns out that the optimal pattern in terms of sensor noise propagation is theoretically the checkerboard if it is correctly sampled, and this pattern is periodic. The reason why checkerboard is optimal is that the image gradient is maximum in this case. In addition, the minimization of the image residual in this case has a quasi-direct solution, which considerably speeds up the calculations. We first recall the basics of the different techniques used in the paper, namely classic subset-based DIC, and a spectral method called Localized Spectrum Analysis (LSA). A recent deconvolution procedure introduced to enhance the metrological performance of DIC and LSA is also briefly recalled and used in this study. Synthetic images are considered to assess in different cases the displacement resolution, as well as other sources of spurious spatial fluctuations observed in the displacement fields such as the pattern-induced bias with DIC. The main conclusion is that using checkerboards instead of random speckles leads to measurements featuring a better compromise between spatial resolution and measurement resolution.

[1]  Frédéric Sur,et al.  On Biases in Displacement Estimation for Image Registration, with a Focus on Photomechanics , 2020, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[2]  Frédéric Sur,et al.  A Critical Comparison of Some Metrological Parameters Characterizing Local Digital Image Correlation and Grid Method , 2017 .

[3]  Julien Réthoré,et al.  A fully integrated noise robust strategy for the identification of constitutive laws from digital images , 2010 .

[4]  Frédéric Sur,et al.  The Grid Method for In‐plane Displacement and Strain Measurement: A Review and Analysis , 2016 .

[5]  Sven Bossuyt,et al.  Quality assessment of speckle patterns for digital image correlation , 2006 .

[6]  M. Grédiac,et al.  Towards Criteria Characterizing the Metrological Performance of Full-field Measurement Techniques , 2020 .

[7]  Frédéric Sur,et al.  Determining displacement and strain maps immune from aliasing effect with the grid method , 2016 .

[8]  Hugh Alan Bruck,et al.  Quantitative Error Assessment in Pattern Matching: Effects of Intensity Pattern Noise, Interpolation, Strain and Image Contrast on Motion Measurements , 2009 .

[9]  Yong Su,et al.  Quality assessment of speckle patterns for DIC by consideration of both systematic errors and random errors , 2016 .

[10]  Wei Tong,et al.  Formulation of Lucas–Kanade Digital Image Correlation Algorithms for Non‐contact Deformation Measurements: A Review , 2013 .

[11]  M. Grédiac,et al.  Extracting Displacement and Strain Fields from Checkerboard Images with the Localized Spectrum Analysis , 2018, Experimental Mechanics.

[12]  P. Picart,et al.  Demodulation of Spatial Carrier Images: Performance Analysis of Several Algorithms Using a Single Image , 2013, 1310.0725.

[13]  Frédéric Sur,et al.  Rendering Deformed Speckle Images with a Boolean Model , 2017, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[14]  Sven Bossuyt,et al.  Optimized Patterns for Digital Image Correlation , 2013 .

[15]  K. Qian,et al.  Study on subset size selection in digital image correlation for speckle patterns. , 2008, Optics express.

[16]  André Chrysochoos,et al.  Basics of Metrology and Introduction to Techniques , 2012 .

[17]  Stepan Vladimirovitch Lomov,et al.  A Self Adaptive Global Digital Image Correlation Algorithm , 2014, Experimental Mechanics.

[18]  D. Seidl,et al.  Spatial DIC Errors due to Pattern-Induced Bias and Grey Level Discretization , 2020, Experimental Mechanics.

[19]  Jacob D. Hochhalter,et al.  Increasing accuracy and precision of digital image correlation through pattern optimization , 2017 .

[20]  P. Reu All about speckles: Aliasing , 2014, Experimental Techniques.

[21]  Xiangyang Xu,et al.  Optimized digital speckle patterns for digital image correlation by consideration of both accuracy and efficiency. , 2018, Applied optics.

[22]  Frédéric Sur,et al.  Effect of interpolation on noise propagation from images to DIC displacement maps , 2016 .

[23]  A. Savitzky,et al.  Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures. , 1964 .

[24]  Richard B. Lehoucq,et al.  The Effect of the Ill-posed Problem on Quantitative Error Assessment in Digital Image Correlation , 2017 .

[25]  Bing Pan,et al.  A Review of Speckle Pattern Fabrication and Assessment for Digital Image Correlation , 2017 .

[26]  E. Grafarend Linear and nonlinear models : fixed effects, random effects, and mixed models , 2006 .

[27]  S. Roux,et al.  Comparison of Local and Global Approaches to Digital Image Correlation , 2012 .

[28]  Michel Grédiac,et al.  Producing and transferring low-spatial-frequency grids for measuring displacement fields with moiré and grid methods , 2004 .

[29]  Frédéric Sur,et al.  Influence of the Analysis Window on the Metrological Performance of the Grid Method , 2016, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[30]  Xiaoping Wu,et al.  Fourier-based interpolation bias prediction in digital image correlation. , 2015, Optics express.

[31]  Frédéric Sur,et al.  On the Propagation of Camera Sensor Noise to Displacement Maps Obtained by DIC - an Experimental Study , 2016 .

[32]  M. Sutton,et al.  Systematic errors in digital image correlation due to undermatched subset shape functions , 2002 .

[33]  M. Grédiac,et al.  Assessment of Digital Image Correlation Measurement Errors: Methodology and Results , 2009 .

[34]  Hubert W. Schreier,et al.  Image Correlation for Shape, Motion and Deformation Measurements: Basic Concepts,Theory and Applications , 2009 .

[35]  Frédéric Sur,et al.  A Robust-to-Noise Deconvolution Algorithm to Enhance Displacement and Strain Maps Obtained with Local DIC and LSA , 2018, Experimental Mechanics.

[36]  B. Blaysat,et al.  On image gradients in digital image correlation , 2016 .

[37]  Justin A. Blaber,et al.  Ncorr: Open-Source 2D Digital Image Correlation Matlab Software , 2015, Experimental Mechanics.

[38]  Frédéric Sur,et al.  Using deconvolution to improve the metrological performance of the grid method , 2013 .

[39]  Huimin Xie,et al.  Mean intensity gradient: An effective global parameter for quality assessment of the speckle patterns used in digital image correlation , 2010 .

[40]  Emanuele Zappa,et al.  Closed-Loop Optimization of DIC Speckle Patterns Based on Simulated Experiments , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[41]  B. Pan,et al.  The errors in digital image correlation due to overmatched shape functions , 2015 .

[42]  Stephen Boyd,et al.  Speckle pattern quality assessment for digital image correlation , 2013 .

[43]  Karen O. Egiazarian,et al.  Practical Poissonian-Gaussian Noise Modeling and Fitting for Single-Image Raw-Data , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[44]  Frédéric Sur,et al.  Towards deconvolution to enhance the grid method for in-plane strain measurement , 2014 .

[45]  P. Reu Calibration: Care and feeding of a stereo-rig , 2014, Experimental Techniques.