You Are Who You Talk To: Detecting Roles in Usenet Newsgroups

Understanding the social roles of the members a group can help to understand the social context of the group. We present a method of applying social network analysis to support the task of characterizing authors in Usenet newsgroups. We compute and visualize networks created by patterns of replies for each author in selected newsgroups and find that second-degree ego-centric networks give us clear distinctions between different types of authors and newsgroups. Results show that newsgroups vary in terms of the populations of participants and the roles that they play. Newsgroups can be characterized by populations that include question and answer newsgroups, conversational newsgroups, social support newsgroups, and flame newsgroups. This approach has applications for both researchers seeking to characterize different types of social cyberspaces as well as participants seeking to distinguish interaction partners and content authors.

[1]  R. Merton.  Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[2]  Danyel Fisher,et al.  Visualizing the Signatures of Social Roles in Online Discussion Groups , 2007, J. Soc. Struct..

[3]  Fernanda B. Viégas,et al.  Newsgroup Crowds and AuthorLines: visualizing the activity of individuals in conversational cyberspaces , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[4]  Warren Sack,et al.  Discourse diagrams: interface design for very large-scale conversations , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[5]  P. Kollock,et al.  Communities in Cyberspace , 2002 .

[6]  Karrie Karahalios,et al.  Visualizing Conversation , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[7]  Henk Sol,et al.  Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1997, HICSS 2015.

[8]  Danyel Fisher,et al.  Picturing Usenet: Mapping Computer-Mediated Collective Action , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[9]  Judith Donath,et al.  Identity and deception in the virtual community , 1998 .

[10]  John Scott.  What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[11]  M. F.,et al.  Bibliography , 1985, Experimental Gerontology.

[12]  Lada A. Adamic.  Zipf, Power-laws, and Pareto-a ranking tutorial , 2000 .

[13]  Danyel Fisher,et al.  Using egocentric networks to understand communication , 2005, IEEE Internet Computing.

[14]  Thomas Erickson,et al.  Designing visualizations of social activity: six claims , 2003, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[15]  Scott A. Golder,et al.  SOCIAL ROLES IN ELECTRONIC COMMUNITIES , 2004 .