Predicting enhancer transcription and activity from chromatin modifications

Enhancers play a pivotal role in regulating the transcription of distal genes. Although certain chromatin features, such as the histone acetyltransferase P300 and the histone modification H3K4me1, indicate the presence of enhancers, only a fraction of enhancers are functionally active. Individual chromatin marks, such as H3K27ac and H3K27me3, have been identified to distinguish active from inactive enhancers. However, the systematic identification of the most informative single modification, or combination thereof, is still lacking. Furthermore, the discovery of enhancer RNAs (eRNAs) provides an alternative approach to directly predicting enhancer activity. However, it remains challenging to link chromatin modifications to eRNA transcription. Herein, we develop a logistic regression model to unravel the relationship between chromatin modifications and eRNA synthesis. We perform a systematic assessment of 24 chromatin modifications in fetal lung fibroblast and demonstrate that a combination of four modifications is sufficient to accurately predict eRNA transcription. Furthermore, we compare the ability of eRNAs and H3K27ac to discriminate enhancer activity. We demonstrate that eRNA is more indicative of enhancer activity. Finally, we apply our fibroblast trained model to six other cell-types and successfully predict eRNA synthesis. Thus, we demonstrate the learned relationships are general and independent of cell-type. We provided a powerful tool to identify active enhancers and reveal the relationship between chromatin modifications, eRNA production and enhancer activity.

[1]  G. Hong,et al.  Nucleic Acids Research , 2015, Nucleic Acids Research.

[2]  Michael Q. Zhang,et al.  Epigenomic Analysis of Multilineage Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2013, Cell.

[3]  Michael Q. Zhang,et al.  Epigenomic Analysis of Multi-lineage Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells. , 2013 .

[4]  S. V. van Heeringen,et al.  Dynamics of enhancer chromatin signatures mark the transition from pluripotency to cell specification during embryogenesis , 2012, Genome research.

[5]  E. Furlong,et al.  Tissue-specific analysis of chromatin state identifies temporal signatures of enhancer activity during embryonic development , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[6]  Michael F. Melgar,et al.  Discovery of active enhancers through bidirectional expression of short transcripts , 2011, Genome Biology.

[7]  S. Spicuglia,et al.  H3K4 tri‐methylation provides an epigenetic signature of active enhancers , 2011, The EMBO journal.

[8]  P. Scacheri,et al.  Epigenetic signatures distinguish multiple classes of enhancers with distinct cellular functions. , 2011, Genome research.

[9]  Leighton J. Core,et al.  Regulating RNA polymerase pausing and transcription elongation in embryonic stem cells. , 2011, Genes & development.

[10]  V. Corces,et al.  Enhancer function: new insights into the regulation of tissue-specific gene expression , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[11]  C. Glass,et al.  Reprogramming Transcription via Distinct Classes of Enhancers Functionally Defined by eRNA , 2011, Nature.

[12]  Ryan A. Flynn,et al.  A unique chromatin signature uncovers early developmental enhancers in humans , 2011, Nature.

[13]  R. Young,et al.  Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  The NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Mapping Consortium , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[15]  Manolis Kellis,et al.  Discovery and characterization of chromatin states for systematic annotation of the human genome , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[16]  Lusy Handoko,et al.  CHD7 Targets Active Gene Enhancer Elements to Modulate ES Cell-Specific Gene Expression , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[17]  C. Glass,et al.  Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[18]  Lee E. Edsall,et al.  Distinct epigenomic landscapes of pluripotent and lineage-committed human cells. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[19]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. , 2010, Nature biotechnology.

[20]  G. Kreiman,et al.  Widespread transcription at neuronal activity-regulated enhancers , 2010, Nature.

[21]  J. Ragoussis,et al.  Identification and characterization of enhancers controlling the inflammatory gene expression program in macrophages. , 2010, Immunity.

[22]  Clifford A. Meyer,et al.  Nucleosome Dynamics Define Transcriptional Enhancers , 2010, Nature Genetics.

[23]  Julia A. Lasserre,et al.  Histone modification levels are predictive for gene expression , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  A. Visel,et al.  Genomic Views of Distant-Acting Enhancers , 2009, Nature.

[25]  Nathaniel D. Heintzman,et al.  Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression , 2009, Nature.

[26]  A. Visel,et al.  ChIP-seq accurately predicts tissue-specific activity of enhancers , 2009, Nature.

[27]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome , 2009, Genome Biology.

[28]  Leighton J. Core,et al.  Nascent RNA Sequencing Reveals Widespread Pausing and Divergent Initiation at Human Promoters , 2008, Science.

[29]  Clifford A. Meyer,et al.  Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) , 2008, Genome Biology.

[30]  Michael Q. Zhang,et al.  Combinatorial patterns of histone acetylations and methylations in the human genome , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[31]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells , 2007, Nature.

[32]  Jane M J Lin,et al.  Identification and Characterization of Cell Type–Specific and Ubiquitous Chromatin Regulatory Structures in the Human Genome , 2007, PLoS genetics.

[33]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project , 2007, Nature.

[34]  V. Iyer,et al.  FAIRE (Formaldehyde-Assisted Isolation of Regulatory Elements) isolates active regulatory elements from human chromatin. , 2007, Genome research.

[35]  Dustin E. Schones,et al.  High-Resolution Profiling of Histone Methylations in the Human Genome , 2007, Cell.

[36]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Histone Replacement Marks the Boundaries of cis-Regulatory Domains , 2007, Science.

[37]  Nathaniel D. Heintzman,et al.  Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[38]  Vincenzo Pirrotta,et al.  Polycomb silencing mechanisms and the management of genomic programmes , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[39]  V. Pirrotta,et al.  Drosophila Enhancer of Zeste/ESC Complexes Have a Histone H3 Methyltransferase Activity that Marks Chromosomal Polycomb Sites , 2002, Cell.

[40]  Brigitte Wild,et al.  Histone Methyltransferase Activity of a Drosophila Polycomb Group Repressor Complex , 2002, Cell.