Driveability of composite piles

Deep foundation has historically involved the use of traditional materials such as concrete, steel and timber. However, these materials suffered from strength degradation and its repair cost is significant especially if installed in harsh marine environment. A relatively new trend in piling industry is to use composites as substitute material. Composites present a novel solution without most of the traditional materials' shortcomings. The basic advantages of composites among other construction materials include lightweight, high strength-to-weight ratio, corrosion resistance, chemical and environmental resistance, and low maintenance cost. Apart from the mentioned advantages, composite materials face impediments since they do not have a long track record of use in piling system. To partially address the aforementioned barrier, this paper presents information on the driveability of composite piles which is one of the first steps toward understanding its behaviour during driving. Additionally, experimental impact test result conducted by the authors on fibre reinforced polymers (FRP) hollow pile is also discussed in this study. Result from the impact test on laminate confirms that longitudinal specimen exhibited higher energy absorption capacity compared to the transverse specimens. The performed axial impact test on pultruded section revealed that degradation of stiffness increases with increasing incident energies and impact cycles. Generally, literature showed limited information on full-scale driving test and needed field tests to carefully assess and verify the driving performance of the composite piles to be used in developing reliable design procedures.

[1]  David A. Wyrick,et al.  Residual Strength of a Carbon/Epoxy Composite Material Subjected to Repeated Impact , 1988 .

[2]  G. Zhou,et al.  Prediction of impact damage thresholds of glass fibre reinforced laminates , 1995 .

[3]  A. Mirmiran,et al.  A new concrete-filled hollow FRP composite column , 1996 .

[4]  Amir Mirmiran,et al.  Behavior of Concrete Columns Confined by Fiber Composites , 1997 .

[5]  Jie Han,et al.  Behavior of Interfaces between Fiber-Reinforced Polymers and Sands , 1999 .

[6]  Magued Iskander,et al.  FRP composite polymer piling, an alternative to timber piling for water front applications , 1999 .

[7]  Magued Iskander,et al.  Driveability of FRP Composite Piling , 2001 .

[8]  Scott A. Ashford,et al.  Drivability of Glass FRP Composite Piling , 2001 .

[9]  Sami H. Rizkalla,et al.  Confinement Model for Axially Loaded Concrete Confined by Circular Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Tubes , 2001 .

[10]  Alfonso Fernández-Canteli,et al.  Dynamic fracture toughness measurements in composites by instrumented Charpy testing: influence of aging , 2002 .

[11]  Magued Iskander,et al.  Wave Equation Analyses of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composite Piling , 2002 .

[12]  Amir Mirmiran,et al.  Analysis and field tests on the performance of composite tubes under pile driving impact , 2002 .

[13]  Miguel A. Pando,et al.  DURABILITY OF CONCRETE-FILLED TUBULAR FRP PILES , 2002 .

[14]  Miguel A. Pando,et al.  Interface Shear Tests on FRP Composite Piles , 2002 .

[15]  Dahsin Liu,et al.  Characterization of Impact Properties and Damage Process of Glass/Epoxy Composite Laminates , 2004 .

[16]  Moncef L. Nehdi,et al.  Interface Characteristics and Laboratory Constructability Tests of Novel Fiber-Reinforced Polymer/Concrete Piles , 2005 .

[17]  M. Pando A Laboratory and Field Study of Composite Piles for Bridge Substructures , 2006 .

[18]  Rajan Sen,et al.  Application of FRP composites for underwater piles repair , 2007 .

[19]  Giovanni Belingardi,et al.  Repeated impact response of hand lay-up and vacuum infusion thick glass reinforced laminates , 2008 .