When is a cause the "same"? Coherent generalization across contexts.

Two competing psychological approaches to causal learning make different predictions regarding what aspect of perceived causality is generalized across contexts. Two experiments tested these predictions. In one experiment, the task required a judgment regarding the existence of a simple causal relation; in the other, the task required a judgment regarding the existence of an interaction between a candidate cause and unobserved background causes. The task materials did not mention assessments of causal strength. Results indicate that causal power (Cartwright, 1989; Cheng, 1997) is the mental construct that people carry from one context to another.

[1]  J. Holland Complex adaptive systems , 1992 .

[2]  John McCarthy,et al.  SOME PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS FROM THE STANDPOINT OF ARTI CIAL INTELLIGENCE , 1987 .

[3]  H. M. Jenkins,et al.  JUDGMENT OF CONTINGENCY BETWEEN RESPONSES AND OUTCOMES. , 1965, Psychological monographs.

[4]  Michael R. Waldmann,et al.  Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: asymmetries in cue competition. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  P. Spirtes,et al.  Causation, Prediction, and Search, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[6]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems , 1988 .

[7]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Structure and strength in causal induction , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  Robert A. Wilson,et al.  Explanation and Cognition , 2000 .

[9]  R. Baierlein Probability Theory: The Logic of Science , 2004 .

[10]  Harold I. Brown,et al.  Nature’s Capacities and their Measurement , 1991 .

[11]  Laura R. Novick,et al.  Explaining Four Psychological Asymmetries in Causal Reasoning : Implications of Causal Assumptions for Coherence , 2007 .

[12]  J. Pearl Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[13]  P. Cheng,et al.  From covariation to causation: a test of the assumption of causal power. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  P. Cheng,et al.  Distinguishing Genuine from Spurious Causes: A Coherence Hypothesis , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  D. Povinelli Folk physics for apes , 2000 .

[16]  P. Cheng From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. , 1997 .

[17]  Refractor Vision , 2000, The Lancet.

[18]  D. Danks Equilibria of the Rescorla--Wagner model , 2003 .

[19]  C. Gallistel The organization of learning , 1990 .

[20]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Judgement of Act-Outcome Contingency: The Role of Selective Attribution , 1984 .

[21]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Structure Learning in Human Causal Induction , 2000, NIPS.

[22]  P. Cheng,et al.  Assessing interactive causal influence. , 2004, Psychological review.

[23]  C. Glymour The Mind's Arrows: Bayes Nets and Graphical Causal Models in Psychology , 2000 .

[24]  Michael R. Waldmann,et al.  Causal Reasoning in Rats , 2006, Science.

[25]  Laura R. Novick,et al.  Constraints and Nonconstraints in Causal Learning: Reply to White (2005) and to Luhmann and Ahn (2005). , 2005 .

[26]  Robert A. Wilson Causality in the Mind: Estimating Contextual and Conjunctive Causal Power , 2006 .

[27]  R. Rescorla A theory of pavlovian conditioning: The effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement , 1972 .

[28]  David Hume A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to introduce the experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects , 1972 .