A mouse-human phase 1 co-clinical trial of a protease-activated fluorescent probe for imaging cancer

A first-in-human phase 1 clinical trial of the PEGylated protease-activated fluorescent probe, LUM015, enables tumor imaging at a safe and tolerable dose in humans. Protease probe tested in humans Cancer cells secrete more of the protease cathepsin than healthy cells, partly as a way to enzymatically remodel their surroundings for tumor growth and metastasis. Whitley et al. developed an imaging probe that could be activated in the presence of these cathepsins, thus allowing surgeons to distinguish tumor margins intraoperatively. Their probe, called LUM015, was able to signal the presence of cancer in vivo in a mouse sarcoma model, and in a so-called “co-clinical trial” in 15 patients, it was safe and cleaved as expected in different types of tumor tissues. With favorable biodistribution and pharmacokinetics also demonstrated, protease-activated probes are now poised for further adaptation to tumor resections, signaling the presence of residual cancer. Local recurrence is a common cause of treatment failure for patients with solid tumors. Intraoperative detection of microscopic residual cancer in the tumor bed could be used to decrease the risk of a positive surgical margin, reduce rates of reexcision, and tailor adjuvant therapy. We used a protease-activated fluorescent imaging probe, LUM015, to detect cancer in vivo in a mouse model of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and ex vivo in a first-in-human phase 1 clinical trial. In mice, intravenous injection of LUM015 labeled tumor cells, and residual fluorescence within the tumor bed predicted local recurrence. In 15 patients with STS or breast cancer, intravenous injection of LUM015 before surgery was well tolerated. Imaging of resected human tissues showed that fluorescence from tumor was significantly higher than fluorescence from normal tissues. LUM015 biodistribution, pharmacokinetic profiles, and metabolism were similar in mouse and human subjects. Tissue concentrations of LUM015 and its metabolites, including fluorescently labeled lysine, demonstrated that LUM015 is selectively distributed to tumors where it is activated by proteases. Experiments in mice with a constitutively active PEGylated fluorescent imaging probe support a model where tumor-selective probe distribution is a determinant of increased fluorescence in cancer. These co-clinical studies suggest that the tumor specificity of protease-activated imaging probes, such as LUM015, is dependent on both biodistribution and enzyme activity. Our first-in-human data support future clinical trials of LUM015 and other protease-sensitive probes.

[1]  M. Bonab randomised trial , 2022 .

[2]  Tuan Vo-Dinh,et al.  A Plasmonic Gold Nanostar Theranostic Probe for In Vivo Tumor Imaging and Photothermal Therapy , 2015, Theranostics.

[3]  L. Devy,et al.  Blockade of MMP14 activity in murine breast carcinomas: implications for macrophages, vessels, and radiotherapy. , 2015, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  A. Samir,et al.  Prospective trial with optical molecular imaging for percutaneous interventions in focal hepatic lesions. , 2015, Radiology.

[5]  Anurag K. Singh,et al.  Significant Reduction of Late Toxicities in Patients With Extremity Sarcoma Treated With Image-Guided Radiation Therapy to a Reduced Target Volume: Results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group RTOG-0630 Trial. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  M. Bogyo,et al.  Detection of intestinal cancer by local, topical application of a quenched fluorescence probe for cysteine cathepsins. , 2015, Chemistry & biology.

[7]  Stephen A. Sastra,et al.  Surface-enhanced resonance Raman scattering nanostars for high-precision cancer imaging , 2015, Science Translational Medicine.

[8]  Jeffrey K. Mito,et al.  MicroRNA-182 drives metastasis of primary sarcomas by targeting multiple genes. , 2014, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[9]  V. Chernomordik,et al.  In Vivo Assessment of HER2 Receptor Density in HER2-positive Tumors by Near-infrared Imaging, Using Repeated Injections of the Fluorescent Probe , 2014, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[10]  C. V. D. van de Velde,et al.  Real-time intraoperative detection of breast cancer using near-infrared fluorescence imaging and Methylene Blue. , 2014, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[11]  S. Steinberg,et al.  Efficacy of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremity: 20-year Follow-Up of a Randomized Prospective Trial , 2014, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[12]  Xiaoyang Xu,et al.  Cancer nanotechnology: the impact of passive and active targeting in the era of modern cancer biology. , 2014, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[13]  Jeffrey K. Mito,et al.  Imaging primary mouse sarcomas after radiation therapy using cathepsin-activatable fluorescent imaging agents. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  R. Jain,et al.  Vascular normalizing doses of antiangiogenic treatment reprogram the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and enhance immunotherapy , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Jeffrey K. Mito,et al.  Intraoperative detection and removal of microscopic residual sarcoma using wide-field imaging , 2012, Cancer.

[16]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  Intraoperative Near-Infrared Fluorescence Tumor Imaging with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Targeting Antibodies , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  P. Choyke,et al.  Near infrared fluorescence‐guided real‐time endoscopic detection of peritoneal ovarian cancer nodules using intravenously injected indocyanine green , 2011, International journal of cancer.

[18]  P. Low,et al.  Intraoperative tumor-specific fluorescence imaging in ovarian cancer by folate receptor-α targeting: first in-human results , 2011, Nature Medicine.

[19]  Ralph Weissleder,et al.  A Systems Approach for Tumor Pharmacokinetics , 2011, PloS one.

[20]  J. Schellens,et al.  Allometric scaling of pegylated liposomal anticancer drugs , 2011, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

[21]  P. Libby,et al.  Molecular imaging of macrophage protease activity in cardiovascular inflammation in vivo , 2011, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[22]  M. Anisimov,et al.  Hydrodynamic radius of polyethylene glycol in solution obtained by dynamic light scattering , 2010 .

[23]  Eric J. Deeds,et al.  Curvature in metabolic scaling , 2010, Nature.

[24]  R. Tsien,et al.  Activatable cell penetrating peptides linked to nanoparticles as dual probes for in vivo fluorescence and MR imaging of proteases , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Gary W. Caldwell,et al.  Allometric scaling of pharmacokinetic parameters in drug discovery: Can human CL, Vss and t1/2 be predicted fromin-vivo rat data? , 2004, European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics.

[26]  Guohui Lin,et al.  Editorial, COCOON 2007 special issue , 2008, Journal of combinatorial optimization.

[27]  Jan Grimm,et al.  A spatially and temporally restricted mouse model of soft tissue sarcoma , 2007, Nature Medicine.

[28]  M. Serrano,et al.  A new mouse model to explore the initiation, progression, and therapy of BRAFV600E-induced lung tumors. , 2007, Genes & development.

[29]  Bonnie F. Sloane,et al.  Cysteine cathepsins: multifunctional enzymes in cancer , 2006, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[30]  R. Weissleder Molecular Imaging in Cancer , 2006, Science.

[31]  J. Pollard,et al.  Distinct role of macrophages in different tumor microenvironments. , 2006, Cancer research.

[32]  J. Cendan,et al.  Accuracy of intraoperative frozen-section analysis of breast cancer lumpectomy-bed margins. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[33]  R. Weissleder,et al.  Optical Imaging of Spontaneous Breast Tumors Using Protease Sensing ‘Smart’ Optical Probes , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[34]  S. Diamond,et al.  High Throughput Substrate Specificity Profiling of Serine and Cysteine Proteases Using Solution-phase Fluorogenic Peptide Microarrays* , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[35]  B. E. F. Isher,et al.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. , 2002 .

[36]  A. Davis,et al.  Preoperative versus postoperative radiotherapy in soft-tissue sarcoma of the limbs: a randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[37]  T. Jacks,et al.  Analysis of lung tumor initiation and progression using conditional expression of oncogenic K-ras. , 2001, Genes & development.

[38]  A. Berns,et al.  Synergistic tumor suppressor activity of BRCA2 and p53 in a conditional mouse model for breast cancer , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[39]  Ralph Weissleder,et al.  In vivo molecular target assessment of matrix metalloproteinase inhibition , 2001, Nature Medicine.

[40]  Shankar Srinivas,et al.  Cre reporter strains produced by targeted insertion of EYFP and ECFP into the ROSA26 locus , 2001, BMC Developmental Biology.

[41]  Andrew V. Nguyen,et al.  Colony-Stimulating Factor 1 Promotes Progression of Mammary Tumors to Malignancy , 2001, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[42]  Bonnie F. Sloane,et al.  Unraveling the role of proteases in cancer. , 2000, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[43]  R. Weissleder,et al.  In vivo imaging of tumors with protease-activated near-infrared fluorescent probes , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[44]  S. Steinberg,et al.  Randomized prospective study of the benefit of adjuvant radiation therapy in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[45]  D H Leung,et al.  Analysis of prognostic factors in 1,041 patients with localized soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[46]  Allan Tucker,et al.  Local Failure and Margin Status in Early‐Stage Breast Carcinoma Treated with Conservation Surgery and Radiation Therapy , 1993, Annals of surgery.

[47]  C. Knecht 25th Anniversary of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons , 1990 .

[48]  W. Dupont,et al.  Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program. , 1990, Controlled clinical trials.

[49]  Fluorescence microscopy of living cells in culture. Part B. Quantitative fluorescence microscopy--imaging and spectroscopy. , 1989, Methods in cell biology.

[50]  E J Freireich,et al.  Quantitative comparison of toxicity of anticancer agents in mouse, rat, hamster, dog, monkey, and man. , 1966, Cancer chemotherapy reports.