Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for In-Hospital Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

IMPORTANCE Patient selection for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) should include assessment of the risks of TAVR compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Existing SAVR risk models accurately predict the risks for the population undergoing SAVR, but comparable models to predict risk for patients undergoing TAVR are currently not available and should be derived from a population that underwent TAVR. OBJECTIVE To use a national population of patients undergoing TAVR to develop a statistical model that will predict in-hospital mortality after TAVR. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Patient data were obtained from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy (STS/ACC TVT) Registry. The model was developed from 13 718 consecutive US patients undergoing TAVR in centers participating in the STS/ACC TVT Registry from November 1, 2011, to February 28, 2014. Validation was conducted using 6868 records of consecutive patients undergoing TAVR from March 1 to October 8, 2014. Covariates were selected through a process of expert opinion and statistical analysis. The association between in-hospital mortality and baseline covariates was estimated using logistic regression. The final set of predictors was selected via stepwise variable selection. Data were collected and analyzed from November 1, 2011, to February 28, 2014. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES In-hospital TAVR mortality. RESULTS The development sample included 13 718 patient records from 265 participant sites (of 13 672 with data available, 6680 men [48.9%]; 6992 women [51.1%]; mean [SD] age, 82.1 [8.3] years). The final validation cohort included 6868 patients from 314 participating centers (3554 men [51.7%]; 3314 women [48.3%]; mean [SD] age, 81.6 [8.8] years). In-hospital mortality occurred in 730 patients (5.3%). The C statistic for discrimination was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.65-0.69) in the development group and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.62-0.69) in the validation group. The final model covariates (reported as odds ratios; 95% CIs) were age (1.13; 1.06-1.20), glomerular filtration rate per 5-U increments (0.93; 0.91-0.95), hemodialysis (3.25; 2.42-4.37), New York Heart Association functional class IV (1.25; 1.03-1.52), severe chronic lung disease (1.67; 1.35-2.05), nonfemoral access site (1.96; 1.65- 2.33), and procedural acuity categories 2 (1.57; 1.20-2.05), 3 (2.70; 2.05-3.55), and 4 (3.34; 1.59-7.02). Calibration analysis demonstrated no significant difference between the model (predicted vs observed) calibration line (-0.18 and 0.97 for intercept and slope, respectively) compared with the ideal calibration line. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Data from the STS/ACC TVT Registry have been used to develop a predictive model of in-hospital mortality for patients undergoing TAVR. Validation based on a population of patient records not used in model development demonstrates discrimination and calibration indices that are more favorable than other models used in populations with TAVR. This model should be a valuable adjunct for patient counseling, local quality improvement, and national monitoring for appropriateness of selection of patients for TAVR.

[1]  G. Grunkemeier,et al.  Net reclassification index: measuring the incremental value of adding a new risk factor to an existing risk model. , 2015, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[2]  Tamara Syrek Jensen,et al.  Transcatheter valve therapy registry is a model for medical device innovation and surveillance. , 2015, Health affairs.

[3]  M. Mack,et al.  The relative performance characteristics of the logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons score in the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves trial. , 2014, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[4]  R. Diaz,et al.  Predictive risk models for transcatheter procedures: how should they be created? , 2014, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[5]  K. Alexander,et al.  Futility, benefit, and transcatheter aortic valve replacement. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[6]  Pascal Leprince,et al.  Predictive factors of early mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: individual risk assessment using a simple score , 2014, Heart.

[7]  Daniel E Forman,et al.  Frailty assessment in the cardiovascular care of older adults. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  Danica Marinac-Dabic,et al.  The STS-ACC transcatheter valve therapy national registry: a new partnership and infrastructure for the introduction and surveillance of medical devices and therapies. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  R. Diaz,et al.  A predictive risk model for transcatheter aortic valve procedures. An extraordinary tool but a formidable challenge. , 2013, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  Andreas Beckmann,et al.  German Aortic Valve Score: a new scoring system for prediction of mortality related to aortic valve procedures in adults. , 2013, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[11]  A. Cribier,et al.  Performance analysis of EuroSCORE II compared to the original logistic EuroSCORE and STS scores for predicting 30-day mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. , 2013, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  Susheel Kodali,et al.  Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for inoperable severe aortic stenosis. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Sanjay Kaul,et al.  2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  M. Mack,et al.  Rational dispersion for the introduction of transcatheter valve therapy. , 2011, JAMA.

[15]  Stuart J Pocock,et al.  Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  F. Maisano,et al.  Incidence and Predictors of Early and Late Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in 663 Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis , 2011, Circulation.

[17]  M. Mack Risk Scores for Predicting Outcomes in Valvular Heart Disease: How Useful? , 2011, Current cardiology reports.

[18]  Nandini Dendukuri,et al.  Gait speed as an incremental predictor of mortality and major morbidity in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  J. Cleveland Frailty, aging, and cardiac surgery outcomes: the stopwatch tells the story. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  S. Pocock,et al.  Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Elizabeth R DeLong,et al.  Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  Sean M. O'Brien,et al.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1--coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. , 2009, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[23]  F. Edwards,et al.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: introduction. , 2009, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[24]  Sean M. O'Brien,et al.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 2--isolated valve surgery. , 2009, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[25]  Sean M. O'Brien,et al.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 3--valve plus coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. , 2009, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[26]  F. Edwards,et al.  Statistical risk modeling and outcomes analysis. , 2008, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[27]  T. Sundt,et al.  Is the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation model valid for estimating the operative risk of patients considered for percutaneous aortic valve replacement? , 2008, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[28]  M. Mack,et al.  Reliability of risk algorithms in predicting early and late operative outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. , 2008, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[29]  K. Zou,et al.  Receiver-Operating Characteristic Analysis for Evaluating Diagnostic Tests and Predictive Models , 2007, Circulation.

[30]  E. DeLong,et al.  Prediction of operative mortality after valve replacement surgery. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.