Research Data Sharing: Practices and Attitudes of Geophysicists

Open data policies have been introduced by governments, funders, and publishers over the past decade. Previous research showed a growing recognition by scientists of the benefits of data-sharing and reuse, but actual practices lag and are not always compliant with new regulations. The goal of this study is to investigate motives, attitudes, and data practices of the community of Earth and planetary geophysicists, a discipline believed to have accepting attitudes toward data sharing and reuse. A better understanding of the attitudes and current data-sharing practices of this scientific community could enable funders, publishers, data managers, and librarians to design systems and services that help scientists understand and adhere to mandates and to create practices, tools, and services that are scientist-focused. An online survey was distributed to the members of the American Geophysical Union, producing 1,372 responses from 116 countries. The attitudes of researchers to data sharing and reuse were generally positive, but in practice, scientists had concerns about sharing their own research data. These concerns include the possibility of potential data misuse and the need for assurance of proper citation and acknowledgement. Training and assistance in good data management practices are lacking in many scientific fields and might help to alleviate these doubts.

[1]  Ayoung Yoon,et al.  Data reusers' trust development , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  Lei Wu,et al.  Managing scientific data as public assets: Data sharing practices and policies among full‐time government employees , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[3]  Elizabeth Yakel,et al.  Social scientists' satisfaction with data reuse , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  Louise Bezuidenhout,et al.  Hidden concerns of sharing research data by low/middle-income country scientists , 2018, Global bioethics = Problemi di bioetica.

[5]  M. Janssen,et al.  A comparison of national open data policies: lessons learned , 2015 .

[6]  A. Treloar,et al.  Open Data in Global Environmental Research: The Belmont Forum’s Open Data Survey , 2016, PloS one.

[7]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[8]  Mercè Crosas,et al.  Data Authorship as an Incentive to Data Sharing. , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  C. Tenopir,et al.  Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions , 2011, PloS one.

[10]  Youngseek Kim,et al.  Institutional and individual factors affecting scientists' data‐sharing behaviors: A multilevel analysis , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  Menno-Jan Kraak,et al.  Deciding on Fitness for Use: Evaluating the Utility of Sample Maps as an Element of Geospatial Metadata , 2005 .

[12]  Ning Jiang,et al.  Our path to better science in less time using open data science tools , 2017, Nature Ecology &Evolution.

[13]  Antonia Ferrer-Sapena,et al.  Correlation between impact factor and public availability of published research data in Information Science and Library Science journals , 2016, Scientometrics.

[14]  Lily Troia,et al.  Research Data Services in Academic Libraries: Data Intensive Roles for the Future? , 2017 .

[15]  Michael B. Yaffe,et al.  Reproducibility in science , 2015, Science Signaling.

[16]  Ayoung Yoon,et al.  Research Data Management Services in Academic Libraries in the US: A Content Analysis of Libraries' Websites , 2017, Coll. Res. Libr..

[17]  Suzie Allard,et al.  Research Data Services in Academic Libraries: Data Intensive Roles for the Future? , 2015 .

[18]  C. Borgman,et al.  If We Share Data, Will Anyone Use Them? Data Sharing and Reuse in the Long Tail of Science and Technology , 2013, PloS one.

[19]  M StantonJeffrey,et al.  Institutional and individual factors affecting scientists' data-sharing behaviors , 2016 .

[20]  Budget,et al.  Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies: Open Data Policy--Managing Information as an Asset , 2013 .

[21]  Katherine G. Akers,et al.  Disciplinary differences in faculty research data management practices and perspectives , 2013, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[22]  H. Pampel,et al.  Open Research Data: From Vision to Practice , 2014 .

[23]  Veerle Van den Eynden,et al.  Survey of Wellcome researchers and their attitudes to open research , 2016 .

[24]  M. McNutt Reproducibility , 2014, Science.

[25]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  How open science helps researchers succeed , 2016, eLife.

[26]  Elizabeth D. Dalton,et al.  Changes in Data Sharing and Data Reuse Practices and Perceptions among Scientists Worldwide , 2015, PloS one.

[27]  Christopher G. Reddick,et al.  The role of policy entrepreneurs in open government data policy innovation diffusion: An analysis of Australian Federal and State Governments , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[28]  Philip Herold,et al.  Data Sharing Among Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources Scientists: An Analysis of Selected Publications , 2015 .

[29]  Youngseek Kim,et al.  Norms of data sharing in biological sciences: The roles of metadata, data repository, and journal and funding requirements , 2016, J. Inf. Sci..