What influences a patient’s decision to use custom-made orthopaedic shoes?

BackgroundDespite potential benefits, some patients decide not to use their custom-made orthopaedic shoes (OS). Factors are known in the domains ‘usability’, ‘communication and service’, and ‘opinion of others’ that influence a patient’s decision to use OS. However, the interplay between these factors has never been investigated. The aim of this study was to explore the interplay between factors concerning OS, and the influences thereof on a patient’s decision to use OS.MethodsA mixed-methods design was used, combining qualitative and quantitative data by means of sequential data analysis and triangulation. Priority was given to the qualitative part. Qualitative data was gathered with a semi-structured interview covering the three domains. Data was analysed using the framework approach. Quantitative data concerned the interplay between factors and determining a rank-order for the importance of factors of ‘usability’.ResultsA patient’s decision to use OS was influenced by various factors indicated as being important and by acceptance of their OS. Factors of ‘usability’ were more important than factors of ‘communication’; the ‘opinion of others’ was of limited importance. An improvement of walking was indicated as the most important factor of ‘usability’. The importance of other factors (cosmetic appearance and ease of use) was determined by reaching a compromise between these factors and an improvement of walking.ConclusionsA patient’s decision to use OS is influenced by various factors indicated as being important and by acceptance of their OS. An improvement of walking is the most important factor of ‘usability’, the importance of other factors (cosmetic appearance and ease of use) is determined by reaching compromises between these factors and an improvement of walking. Communication is essential to gain insight in a patient’s acceptance and in the compromises they are willing to reach. This makes communication the key for clinicians to influence a patient’s decision to use OS.

[1]  C. Nester,et al.  Rheumatoid arthritis patients' experiences of wearing therapeutic footwear - A qualitative investigation , 2007, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[2]  Maxine Johnson,et al.  Patient and professional perspectives on prescribed therapeutic footwear for people with diabetes: a vignette study. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[3]  Klaas Postema,et al.  Use and usability of custom-made orthopedic shoes. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[4]  Yvonne Wengström,et al.  Combining qualitative and quantitative research within mixed method research designs: A methodological review , 2011, International Journal of Nursing Studies.

[5]  Marcia J. Scherer Living in the state of stuck , 2005 .

[6]  A. Williams,et al.  Shoes in the cupboard: The fate of prescribed footwear? , 2001, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[7]  Otr,et al.  A New Conceptual Model for Assistive Technology Outcomes Research and Practice , 2010 .

[8]  Jenny Strong,et al.  Factors that predict the post-discharge use of recommended assistive technology (AT) , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[9]  J. Jensen,et al.  Factors in diabetic footwear compliance. , 2003, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[10]  J. Browne,et al.  Development of a direct weighting procedure for quality of life domains , 1997, Quality of Life Research.

[11]  J. M. Davies,et al.  Qualitative Research in Health Care , 1996, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London.

[12]  G. Gelderblom,et al.  Non-use of provided assistive technology devices, a literature overview , 2004 .

[13]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Use of orthopedic shoes in patients with degenerative disorders of the foot. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  James A Lenker,et al.  A New Conceptual Model for Assistive Technology Outcomes Research and Practice , 2004, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[15]  James A Lenker,et al.  A Review of Conceptual Models for Assistive Technology Outcomes Research and Practice , 2003, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[16]  B. Weiner,et al.  The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[17]  John W. Michael Living in a State of Stuck , 1994 .

[18]  M. Jannink,et al.  Patients’ expectations and actual use of custom-made orthopaedic shoes , 2010, Clinical rehabilitation.