Environmental regulation, productive efficiency and cost of pollution abatement: a case study of the sugar industry in India.

In this paper the input distance function is estimated for the Indian Sugar industry under alternative assumptions of weak and strong disposability of bad outputs. The estimated distance function is used to make the estimates of environmental efficiency, Malmquist productivity index and shadow prices of pollutants. The technical efficiency measure estimated under the assumption of weak disposability of bad outputs is utilized to test the Porter hypothesis. Marginal costs of pollution abatement functions are estimated for different pollutants of water. Pollutant specific taxes are computed using the tax-standards method.

[1]  D. Primont,et al.  Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications , 1994 .

[2]  R. Färe,et al.  An activity analysis model of the environmental performance of firms—application to fossil-fuel-fired electric utilities , 1996 .

[3]  Surender Kumar,et al.  Environmental and Economic Accounting for Industry , 2005 .

[4]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY , 1982 .

[5]  P. Portney.  The theory of environmental policy , 1976 .

[6]  Surender Kumar,et al.  Measuring Cost of Sustainable Industrial Development in India: A Distance Function Approach , 2002 .

[7]  Atakelty Hailu,et al.  Environmentally Sensitive Productivity Analysis of the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry, 1959-1994: An Input Distance Function Approach , 2000 .

[8]  Surender Kumar,et al.  Measuring the cost of environmentally sustainable industrial development in India: a distance function approach , 2002, Environment and Development Economics.

[9]  P. Schmidt.  Frontier production functions , 1985 .

[10]  Wallace E. Oates,et al.  The theory of environmental policy , 1976 .

[11]  W. Meeusen,et al.  Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error , 1977 .

[12]  J. Coggins,et al.  The Price of Pollution: A Dual Approach to Valuing SO2Allowances , 1994 .

[13]  Lauri Hetemäki,et al.  ESSAYS ON THE IMPACT OF POLLUTION CONTROL ON A FIRM: A DISTANCE FUNCTION APPROACH , 1996 .

[14]  Mark J. Roberts,et al.  Environmental Regulations and Productivity Growth: The Case of Fossil-fueled Electric Power Generation , 1983, Journal of Political Economy.

[15]  M N Murty,et al.  Win-win opportunities and environmental regulation: testing of porter hypothesis for Indian manufacturing industries. , 2003, Journal of environmental management.

[16]  Gale A. Boyd,et al.  The Impact of Environmental Constraints on Productivity Improvement in Integrated Paper Plants , 1999 .

[17]  Rolf Färe,et al.  On price efficiency , 1990 .

[18]  R. Färe.  Derivation of Shadow Prices for Undesirable Outputs: A Distance Function Approach , 1993 .

[19]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[20]  R. Shepherd.  Theory of cost and production functions , 1970 .

[21]  Scott E. Atkinson,et al.  Bayesian measurement of productivity and efficiency in the presence of undesirable outputs: crediting electric utilities for reducing air pollution , 2005 .

[22]  A. U.S.,et al.  FORMULATION AND ESTIMATION OF STOCHASTIC FRONTIER PRODUCTION FUNCTION MODELS , 2001 .