An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements

This paper presents a mathematical model which predicts both the major qualitative features and, within experimental error, the quantitative details of a class of perturbed and unperturbed large-amplitude, voluntary movements performed at intermediate speed by primates. A feature of the mathematical model is that a concise description of the behavioral organization of the movement has been formulated which is separate and distinct from the description of the dynamics of movement execution. Based on observations of voluntary movements in primates, the organization has been described as though the goal were to make the smoothest movement possible under the circumstances, i.e., to minimize the accelerative transients. This has been formalized by using dynamic optimization theory to determine the movement which minimizes the rate of change of acceleration (jerk) of the limb. Based on observations of muscle mechanics, the concept of a “virtual position” determined by the active states of the muscles is rigorously defined as one of the mechanical consequences of the neural commands to the muscles. This provides insight into the mechanics of perturbed and unperturbed movements and is a useful aid in the separation of the descriptions of movement organization and movement execution.

[1]  E. Blum,et al.  The Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes. , 1963 .

[2]  F. Buchthal,et al.  Contraction times and fibre types in intact human muscle. , 1970, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[3]  L. Stark,et al.  Time optimal behavior of human saccadic eye movement , 1975 .

[4]  George E. Stelmach,et al.  Central and Peripheral Mechanisms in Motor Control , 1976 .

[5]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Processes controlling arm movements in monkeys. , 1978, Science.

[6]  D. Vicario,et al.  The control of rapid limb movement in the cat II. Scaling of isometric force adjustments , 1978, Experimental brain research.

[7]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Characteristics of motor programs underlying arm movements in monkeys. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Processes controlling visually evoked movements , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  G. Zahalak,et al.  A Quantitative Evaluation of the Frequency-Response Characteristics of Active Human Skeletal Muscle In Vivo , 1979 .

[10]  J. Lanman Movement and the mechanical properties of the intact human elbow joint. , 1980 .

[11]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Terminal accuracy of unexpectedly loaded rapid movements: evidence for a mass-spring mechanism in programming. , 1980, Journal of motor behavior.

[12]  J. Kelso,et al.  Exploring a vibratory systems analysis of human movement production. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  E. Bizzi 7 Central and Peripheral Mechanisms in Motor Control , 1980 .

[14]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Human arm trajectory formation. , 1982, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  Richard B. Stein,et al.  What muscle variable(s) does the nervous system control in limb movements? , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[16]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Mechanical properties of muscles: Implications for motor control , 1982, Trends in Neurosciences.

[17]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Posture control and trajectory formation during arm movement , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  N. A. Bernshteĭn,et al.  Human motor actions : Bernstein reassessed , 1984 .

[19]  N. Hogan Adaptive control of mechanical impedance by coactivation of antagonist muscles , 1984 .