Fouling distribution in forward osmosis membrane process.

Fouling behavior along the length of membrane module was systematically investigated by performing simple modeling and lab-scale experiments of forward osmosis (FO) membrane process. The flux distribution model developed in this study showed a good agreement with experimental results, validating the robustness of the model. This model demonstrated, as expected, that the permeate flux decreased along the membrane channel due to decreasing osmotic pressure differential across the FO membrane. A series of fouling experiments were conducted under the draw and feed solutions at various recoveries simulated by the model. The simulated fouling experiments revealed that higher organic (alginate) fouling and thus more flux decline were observed at the last section of a membrane channel, as foulants in feed solution became more concentrated. Furthermore, the water flux in FO process declined more severely as the recovery increased due to more foulants transported to membrane surface with elevated solute concentrations at higher recovery, which created favorable solution environments for organic adsorption. The fouling reversibility also decreased at the last section of the membrane channel, suggesting that fouling distribution on FO membrane along the module should be carefully examined to improve overall cleaning efficiency. Lastly, it was found that such fouling distribution observed with co-current flow operation became less pronounced in counter-current flow operation of FO membrane process.

[1]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis , 2006 .

[2]  M. Pérez,et al.  Comparison of MF/UF pretreatment with conventional filtration prior to RO membranes for surface seawater desalination , 2002 .

[3]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes , 1997 .

[4]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Colloidal fouling in forward osmosis: Role of reverse salt diffusion , 2012 .

[5]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: modeling and experiments. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Boron transport in forward osmosis: Measurements, mechanisms, and comparison with reverse osmosis , 2012 .

[7]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Relating organic fouling of reverse osmosis membranes to intermolecular adhesion forces. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Comparison of fouling behavior in forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO) , 2010 .

[9]  Minkyu Park,et al.  Simulation of forward osmosis membrane process: Effect of membrane orientation and flow direction of feed and draw solutions , 2011 .

[10]  Kerri L. Hickenbottom,et al.  Forward osmosis treatment of drilling mud and fracturing wastewater from oil and gas operations , 2013 .

[11]  Sangho Lee,et al.  Effect of membrane properties and pretreatment on flux and NOM rejection in surface water nanofiltration , 2007 .

[12]  Rong Wang,et al.  A modeling investigation on optimizing the design of forward osmosis hollow fiber modules , 2012 .

[13]  R. Baker,et al.  Membranes for power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis , 1981 .

[14]  A. Drews,et al.  Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. , 2009, Water research.

[15]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Fouling control in a forward osmosis process integrating seawater desalination and wastewater reclamation , 2013 .

[16]  M. Elimelech,et al.  The Future of Seawater Desalination: Energy, Technology, and the Environment , 2011, Science.