Evaluation of a Diabetes Management System Based on Practice Guidelines, Integrated Care, and Continuous Quality Management in a Federal State of Germany

OBJECTIVE—The aim of this study was to evaluate the Saxon Diabetes Management Program (SDMP), which is based on integrated practice guidelines, shared care, and integrated quality management. The SDMP was implemented into diabetes contracts between health insurance providers, general practitioners (GPs), and diabetes specialized practitioners (DSPs) unified in the Saxon association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—The evaluation of the SDMP in Germany represents a real-world study by using clinical data collected from participating physicians. Between 2000 and 2002 all DSPs and about 75% of the GPs in Saxony participated. Finally, 291,771 patients were included in the SDMP. Cross-sectional data were evaluated at the beginning of 2000 (group A1) and at the end of 2002 (group A2). A subcohort of 105,204 patients was followed over a period of 3 years (group B). RESULTS—The statewide implementation of the SDMP resulted in a change in therapeutic practice and in better cooperation. The median A1C at the time of referral to DSPs decreased from 8.5 to 7.5%, and so did the overall mean. At the end, 78 and 61% of group B achieved the targets for A1C and blood pressure, respectively, recommended by the guidelines compared with 69 and 50% at baseline. Patients with poorly controlled diabetes benefited the most. Preexisting regional differences were aligned. CONCLUSIONS—Integrated care disease management with practicable integrated quality management including collaboration between GPs and specialist services is a significant innovation in chronic care management and an efficient way to improve diabetes care continuously.

[1]  J. Piette,et al.  National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education , 2010, Diabetes Care.

[2]  P. Schwarz,et al.  Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes - Lessons we have Learnt for Implementation , 2007, Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme.

[3]  S. Bornstein,et al.  Development of a Diabetes Prevention Management Program for Clinical Practice , 2007, Public health reports.

[4]  S. Bornstein,et al.  [Prevention of type 2 diabetes in Germany. Ideas, evidence, implementation]. , 2006, Medizinische Klinik.

[5]  S. Bornstein,et al.  Diabetes Prevention - From Physiology to Implementation , 2006, Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme.

[6]  H. Wyatt,et al.  Are health care professionals advising patients with diabetes or at risk for developing diabetes to exercise more? , 2006, Diabetes care.

[7]  R. Torella,et al.  Cardiovascular risk factors and disease management in type 2 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy. , 2006, Diabetes care.

[8]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Quality of care and outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients: a comparison between general practice and diabetes clinics. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[9]  Ulrike Rothe,et al.  Verbesserung der Versorgung von Diabetikern durch das sächsische Betreuungsmodell , 2003 .

[10]  G Charpentier,et al.  Control of diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes: a nationwide French survey. , 2003, Diabetes & metabolism.

[11]  P. Suwattee,et al.  Quality of care for diabetic patients in a large urban public hospital. , 2003, Diabetes care.

[12]  M. Engelgau,et al.  A Diabetes Report Card for the United States: Quality of Care in the 1990s , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  J. Schrader [When blood pressure does not lower at night. Stroke risk is greatly elevated]. , 2002, MMW Fortschritte der Medizin.

[14]  E. Wagner,et al.  Chronic care clinics for diabetes in primary care: a system-wide randomized trial. , 2001, Diabetes care.

[15]  S. Norris,et al.  Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. , 2001, Diabetes care.

[16]  B. B. Fleming,et al.  Quality of medical care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries: A profile at state and national levels. , 2000, JAMA.

[17]  R. Holman,et al.  Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  J. Piette,et al.  National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education , 2000, Diabetes Care.

[19]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Seeing what you want to see in randomised controlled trials: versions and perversions of UKPDS data , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  J. Selby,et al.  Diabetes management in a health maintenance organization. Efficacy of care management using cluster visits. , 1999, Diabetes care.

[21]  G. Cathelineau The St Vincent Declaration. A long march for significant changes. , 1999, Diabetes & metabolism.

[22]  David J. Hunter,et al.  Managed care: Disease management , 1997 .

[23]  G. Müller,et al.  [Rigid RSA DMP for Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus: results of a three-state survey]. , 2005, Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung.

[24]  Pamela Tabar,et al.  Disease management. , 2005, Healthcare informatics : the business magazine for information and communication systems.

[25]  G. Müller,et al.  [Improvement of care for diabetics using the care model from Saxony]. , 2003, Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift.

[26]  [MEDIAS 2 educational program. Turns the patient into a diabetes expert]. , 2002, MMW Fortschritte der Medizin.

[27]  M. Hermans,et al.  Glycaemic and blood pressure controls achieved in a cohort of 318 patients with type 2 diabetes. , 1999, Acta clinica Belgica.